That claim is a blind belief with a total lack of proof, scientific or otherwise.
"everyone i don't like or disagree with must be a bot" And your ideological opponents believe likewise, so the "You're A Bot Argument" is an absolutely impotent and worthless argument.
I've discoursed with Will quite a lot. He likes to write like a bot before bots could write so well, but he's really in the category of people who invent their own language, limit themselves to it, and demand others learn it as better than their own. Though he says his contribution is "inspired" by criticisms of all religion, he's more minimalist than anti-theist, describing an impersonal All but somehow finding meaning in his daily routines anyway. That makes him open to pre-evangelism. He's actually much more nuanced than he used to be and a bit easier to follow, and he's mostly harmless.
That claim is a blind belief with a total lack of proof, scientific or otherwise.
"everyone i don't like or disagree with must be a bot" And your ideological opponents believe likewise, so the "You're A Bot Argument" is an absolutely impotent and worthless argument.
Mabye you believe that, but the pattern I recgonize is that disagreement is misconstrued as bots.
That is far more than case than whatever you're saying?
He is merely a "schizo". Resembles nothing like chatgpt. May as well claim that all people are bad because they drink water because Stalin drank water
I've discoursed with Will quite a lot. He likes to write like a bot before bots could write so well, but he's really in the category of people who invent their own language, limit themselves to it, and demand others learn it as better than their own. Though he says his contribution is "inspired" by criticisms of all religion, he's more minimalist than anti-theist, describing an impersonal All but somehow finding meaning in his daily routines anyway. That makes him open to pre-evangelism. He's actually much more nuanced than he used to be and a bit easier to follow, and he's mostly harmless.