I've discoursed with Will quite a lot. He likes to write like a bot before bots could write so well, but he's really in the category of people who invent their own language, limit themselves to it, and demand others learn it as better than their own. Though he says his contribution is "inspired" by criticisms of all religion, he's more minimalist than anti-theist, describing an impersonal All but somehow finding meaning in his daily routines anyway. That makes him open to pre-evangelism. He's actually much more nuanced than he used to be and a bit easier to follow, and he's mostly harmless.
Oh, I apologize. Something the Lord told me to adopt here was to dismiss nobody out of hand, so I've been learning that style, as my usual style is to totally ignore folks like that. But as an etymologist who knows at least half his etymologies are fake, I guess I got a little empathy for him.
It's up to you if you don't trust folks who seek to pre-evangelize everybody. Conspiracies is a great forum for excluding various groups of humans for simplicity's sake, so I don't fit in.
Note, Scott is not responsible for my views, which are solely those of Swamp Ranger 164.
Mabye you believe that, but the pattern I recgonize is that disagreement is misconstrued as bots.
That is far more than case than whatever you're saying?
I'm not measuring anything regarding agree or disagree. Here is the most obvious one that's been here since the beginning: u/free-will-of-choice/
He is merely a "schizo". Resembles nothing like chatgpt. May as well claim that all people are bad because they drink water because Stalin drank water
I've discoursed with Will quite a lot. He likes to write like a bot before bots could write so well, but he's really in the category of people who invent their own language, limit themselves to it, and demand others learn it as better than their own. Though he says his contribution is "inspired" by criticisms of all religion, he's more minimalist than anti-theist, describing an impersonal All but somehow finding meaning in his daily routines anyway. That makes him open to pre-evangelism. He's actually much more nuanced than he used to be and a bit easier to follow, and he's mostly harmless.
Stop the cap. Now I know you aren't here in good faith either. It's all fake talk.
Oh, I apologize. Something the Lord told me to adopt here was to dismiss nobody out of hand, so I've been learning that style, as my usual style is to totally ignore folks like that. But as an etymologist who knows at least half his etymologies are fake, I guess I got a little empathy for him.
It's up to you if you don't trust folks who seek to pre-evangelize everybody. Conspiracies is a great forum for excluding various groups of humans for simplicity's sake, so I don't fit in.
Note, Scott is not responsible for my views, which are solely those of Swamp Ranger 164.