I read it a few weeks ago and it seemed to me like both a readable (in layman's terms) and incontrovertible study. Correlation is totally clear so it's a matter of finding cause, but regardless we need to seriously reconsider the entire vaccination schedule, immediately, because even if these shots work (and I think they generally do) it may not be worth it to prevent deaths in some children (99%+ children who contract measles, for example, are not even hospitalized, much less die) if the cost is childhood diabetes and learning disabilities for all children.
Avoiding the clotter was the best choice we all made. I work with several fit and healthy people who had heart attacks under 40, after getting vaxxed. I didn't work with them at the time or they'd likely know better not to take it.
How is this a debate when the kids that didn't get a random shot in their bloodstream with questionable contents are clearly better?
There is a free film about this: https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Entered-into-hearing-record-Impact-of-Childhood-Vaccination-on-Short-and-Long-Term-Chronic-Health-Outcomes-in-Children-A-Birth-Cohort-Study.pdf
Good, I hope they take a good look at it.
I read it a few weeks ago and it seemed to me like both a readable (in layman's terms) and incontrovertible study. Correlation is totally clear so it's a matter of finding cause, but regardless we need to seriously reconsider the entire vaccination schedule, immediately, because even if these shots work (and I think they generally do) it may not be worth it to prevent deaths in some children (99%+ children who contract measles, for example, are not even hospitalized, much less die) if the cost is childhood diabetes and learning disabilities for all children.
Avoiding the clotter was the best choice we all made. I work with several fit and healthy people who had heart attacks under 40, after getting vaxxed. I didn't work with them at the time or they'd likely know better not to take it.