Avoiding the clotter was the best choice we all made. I work with several fit and healthy people who had heart attacks under 40, after getting vaxxed. I didn't work with them at the time or they'd likely know better not to take it.
I read it a few weeks ago and it seemed to me like both a readable (in layman's terms) and incontrovertible study. Correlation is totally clear so it's a matter of finding cause, but regardless we need to seriously reconsider the entire vaccination schedule, immediately, because even if these shots work (and I think they generally do) it may not be worth it to prevent deaths in some children (99%+ children who contract measles, for example, are not even hospitalized, much less die) if the cost is childhood diabetes and learning disabilities for all children.
How is this a debate when the kids that didn't get a random shot in their bloodstream with questionable contents are clearly better?
There is a free film about this: https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com
Avoiding the clotter was the best choice we all made. I work with several fit and healthy people who had heart attacks under 40, after getting vaxxed. I didn't work with them at the time or they'd likely know better not to take it.
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Entered-into-hearing-record-Impact-of-Childhood-Vaccination-on-Short-and-Long-Term-Chronic-Health-Outcomes-in-Children-A-Birth-Cohort-Study.pdf
Good, I hope they take a good look at it.
I read it a few weeks ago and it seemed to me like both a readable (in layman's terms) and incontrovertible study. Correlation is totally clear so it's a matter of finding cause, but regardless we need to seriously reconsider the entire vaccination schedule, immediately, because even if these shots work (and I think they generally do) it may not be worth it to prevent deaths in some children (99%+ children who contract measles, for example, are not even hospitalized, much less die) if the cost is childhood diabetes and learning disabilities for all children.