Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

5
Returning from the moon (twitter.com)
posted 57 days ago by deletedandreacted 57 days ago by deletedandreacted +7 / -2
69 comments share
69 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 54 days ago +2 / -1

Did the world powers ban the use of nuclear weapons too?

Yes. They cause the loss of jewish power. That’s why they haven’t been used since their first use to create the global jewish world.

Or did international law (which is a joke) ban invading independent countries?

Why would it do that? It has never done that. That would prevent jews keeping their slaves in line.

When was going to the moon and setting bases there banned exactly?

It wasn’t. Keep your strawmen to yourself.

Do you have the document?

How about you provide the one that says it never happened. Oh right, despite literally every event in world history eventually leaking, including the hoax of the holocaust itself, you have absolutely nothing anywhere under any circumstances that shows the Moon landings were a hoax. Every. Single. Fucking. Event. Leaks.

So where are your documents. Where are your pictures of the studios. Where are your work orders for the materials they bought to assemble the stages. Where are the blueprints for the satellites they sent to the Moon itself to broadcast radio signals of people talking back at earth, which were clearly picked up by hundreds of independent radio astronomers during the Apollo missions. When were those satellites launched. What flights. What rockets. What days. Because clearly those have to exist, otherwise it wasn’t a hoax and people went to the Moon, because those voices had to come from somewhere.

Where is your fucking evidence, you filthy subhuman yid.

they didn't come back to the moon because they've lost the technology

Nope.

and don't have the money

You’re purposely lying about my responses.

even though they literally printed 3 trillions in two weeks for a fake pandemic.

Thanks for admitting you don’t understand economics. You just made my argument for me.

Makes total sense. You're a certified retard dude.

Irony.

But at least you're a true 'Murican patriotic retard, which is the good kind.

Don’t worry; you’ll be killed by your owners as a reward for parroting their lies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– SmithW1984 -1 points 53 days ago +1 / -2

When was going to the moon and setting bases there banned exactly?

It wasn’t. Keep your strawmen to yourself.

Lol you degenerate liar. This:

also it makes no sense not to weaponize space because every country regularly uses chemical and biological weapons on each other and there’s absolutely no way anyone would simply agree to ban them from use because… uh…

was your stupid argument and I refuted it - International law has banned a lot of things that are currently going on, do you realize that? There is no stupid ban or law that will prevent a world power to do as it pleases if it's geopolitically beneficial and viable to do so. This is what power means. This includes not only setting military bases anywhere, but also use of biological and nuclear weapons or committing genocide.

Thanks for admitting you don’t understand economics. You just made my argument for me.

Please enlighten me then. Or do you believe making assertions is an argument you moron?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 53 days ago +1 / -0

degenerate liar

Neat, so you admit no one said it was banned. Scream for me.

was your stupid argument

No. Dipshit. It wasn’t. It was me proving to you that everyone agreed to ban it for the same reason chemical and biological weapons are banned. Because they are banned. You are physically incapable of denying this.

International law has banned a lot of things that are currently going on

Not really, no. Thanks for admitting your argument is a lie.

There is no stupid ban or law that will prevent a world power to do as it pleases if it's geopolitically beneficial and viable to do so.

There is. It’s called the Talmud. Nothing happens outside of its desires. That is why international law obtains, despite every country committing suicide in doing so. You’re not even pretending to know anything about how the world works.

This is what power means.

Yeah, it’s the power to ban biological, chemical, nuclear and space-based weaponry. Worldwide. Even while you present a scripted narrative of countries “at war” with each other or “hostile” to one another who have these weapons.

True power is not over bodies. It’s over thought itself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– SmithW1984 0 points 53 days ago +1 / -1

No. Dipshit. It wasn’t. It was me proving to you that everyone agreed to ban it for the same reason chemical and biological weapons are banned. Because they are banned. You are physically incapable of denying this.

Let's unpack. I wrote:

If they truly did it 60 years ago, we'd see numerous moon bases and satellites all over it by now. Just think of the military superiority that would come from controlling the moon - what, you think that the Pentagon, Russia and China would spare resources to get the upper hand?

You answered sarcastically:

also it makes no sense not to weaponize space because every country regularly uses chemical and biological weapons on each other and there’s absolutely no way anyone would simply agree to ban them from use because… uh…

Then I countered that:

International law has banned a lot of things that are currently going on, do you realize that? There is no stupid ban or law that will prevent a world power to do as it pleases if it's geopolitically beneficial and viable to do so. This is what power means. This includes not only setting military bases anywhere, but also use of biological and nuclear weapons or committing genocide.

And you still didn't get it. The point I made was that no one could forbid a global power to go and set moon bases. Even if everyone agrees to ban this, it could still be violated just like the other instances of international law violations that are happening. Only a complete tool like yourself thinks that banning something prevents it from happening. Who is going to enforce the ban, genius? If the US decides to build a military base as part of their Full Spectrum Dominance strategy, who is gonna stop them? Pakistan? It's not that hard - those who hold the most power can make or break the rules. Tell me you're not that stupid and you get this at least.

I'm sorry I doubted you may be a fedboy - you're clearly a retard and a troll.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 53 days ago +2 / -1

And you still didn't get it.

“International law bans things that do remain banned EXCEPT FOR THIS ONE THING WHICH DEEEEEEEEEEEFINITELY ISN’T BANNED—DESPITE BEING EXPLICITLY BANNED—AND CLEARLY SHOULD BE HAPPENING DESPITE THE BAN, EVEN THOUGH I ADMIT OTHER THINGS OF EQUAL CALIBER DON’T HAPPEN WITH THE BAN therefore you are wrong!”

Who doesn’t get it?

no one could forbid

Jews can. Jews did. They own all global powers. Just like they banned the use of nukes in war. Just like they banned the use of biological weapons. Just like they banned the use of chemical weapons. Just like they banned the use of specie-backed currency. Just like they banned white-only countries.

It is physically impossible for you to refute these statements. Just stop. You’re humiliating yourself.

Even if everyone agrees to ban this, it could still be violated

Not really. Only twelve states have launch capacity, and all are owned by jews.

Only a complete tool like yourself thinks that banning something prevents it from happening.

Too bad for you no one said that.

Who is going to enforce the ban, genius?

The countries doing the enforcement of all other global bans, dumbass yid.

If the US decides to build a military base as part of their Full Spectrum Dominance strategy, who is gonna stop them?

No one, because it would be on the orders of the jews. Simultaneously, the other powers would do exactly the same thing to further jewish power even more. Just like how every single country on earth is simultaneously building digital-only currencies tied to a single global bank.

It's not that hard

It really isn’t, so you purposely misunderstanding things that everyone else here already knows is pretty fucking gay.

those who hold the most power can make or break the rules

WOW! SO, LIKE, IF THERE WAS A SINGLE GLOBAL AUTHORITY THAT SAID “DO NOT GO BACK TO SPACE” WAS A RULE, THEY COULD… MAKE THAT RULE? AND PEOPLE WOULD OBEY IT? BECAUSE THEY HAD THE MOST POWER? WOWIE ZOWIE! I WISH SOMEONE IN THIS CONVERSATION HAD SAID THIS ALREADY!

Tell me you're not that stupid and you get this at least.

Fuck, you’re an embarrassment to your coworkers.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy