I was citing a cultured Roman resident who resisted the empire for 60 years without change, enough to understand its view on pharmaceuticals. The Bible is not monolithic, learn history. And nobody has come up with a better explanation for how Horeb could have rumbled with words that are so sublime as to be still engraved on government halls today.
Good one...well except for all of the laws that existed way before. Besides that, fully half of them are about God being a jealous god and making sure people know that, and of those left, only two are anything that we actually have any laws covering, theft and murder.
Tell me again why they should be posted all over schools and public buildings when they don't even apply to every United States Citizen?
One Roman resident is your only source? Good Science,,,,
Do you wish to debate? I insist on having commitment to truth pursuit and use of straightforward binary propositions in that case.
Yeah, Hammurabi is sublime too (he's about the only one that qualifies for "all the laws before"), but somehow Moses got the cut and Hammurabi mostly didn't.
Yeah, a half-half balance between responsibility toward man and toward the holistic intelligence of the cosmos known as God is an excellent Self-Other paradigm. The cosmos must be upheld as unique and not divergent for any basic philosophy or theology to succeed, so its representative (Yahweh) would be naturally "jealous". (You could go from there into the ordinary atheist tropes about misunderstanding the cultural context of certain specific laws, but I'd rather you did that at c/Atheist and pinged me, so that we wouldn't be derailing u/LightBringerFlex.)
Yeah, the principles of respect for authority, regulation of marriage, and true testimony are enshrined through American and most other laws. If you want to nitpick about coveting, that one is a necessary demonstration that the internal (which is not generally covered by law, Mosaic or not) must still be cultivated as part of getting the external right.
If you object to how our government posts them, I suggest you take it up with them where they've discussed the matter in great detail, the Supreme Court. At risk of misquoting them, their position appears to be that upholding public morality for every citizen and resident is a proper function of a state that guarantees freedom of religion, and this is rightly done by recognizing the greater influence that some methods of upholding morality have historically had within our nation.
You brought up Horeb, so it's on you to advance discussion rather than to snark in AI echoes.
Getting back to OP, I was merely responding to OP by citing a supportive source and implying that the Biblical authority, such as it is, is a strong argument against the philosophy of pharmacy as a whole. For people who discount that authority, it would be a simple matter to cite recent science, starting with the person appointed to regulate that, Bobby Kennedy, and going back through such names as Kary Mullis and Linus Pauling. Since you have not expressed a single position relevant to OP, but were only triggered by a citation supportive of it to go on a tangent, I repeat that if you want to debate something then indicate your willingness to pursue truth wherever it leads and to select a meaningful binary proposition to see if I disagree.
I am pretty sure I am out of my depth debating any of this with your as your knowledge quite obviously supersedes any Gooberesque opinion I would have on the subject. Well played!
My only contribution is that if we are a nation built upon moral law, and that law comes from the Bible (which, while there is influence from biblical principles, I bristle at the idea that we were founded as a Christian Nation) why post the Ten Commandments of the old covenant? I think it would be much more effective that the Beatitudes were posted as they not only exist under the new covenant, but express the ideas and teachings of Jesus Christ than the Ten Commandments do, if you believe in that sort of thing, which I do not, and don't want to be forced to. I may not have a choice as this nation marches further and further into defacto autocratic Christian rule.
Thanks Mephisto, I larp as high-IQ in the hopes of making it someday.
why post the Ten Commandments of the old covenant? I think it would be much more effective that the Beatitudes were posted
Great question! It sounds cultural as if there's something about America that likes the Ten Words more than the Eight Blessings. I will bookmark that unanswered because it's probably a valid criticism that American churchianity is more comfortable putting Moses forward than Jesus in many circumstances, when you'd think they'd be willing to put Jesus first despite offense.
I will note though that we were literally constituted "in the year of our Lord" 1787, and by putting that clause in the Constitution the founders were all giving Jesus authority to lord this land indefinitely. Not that we're doing a great job, but better than some, with more to come. Since you find yourself stuck in a country with us constitutionists, I encourage you to make a lifelong pursuit of finding out the real law that transcends the Ten Words (many atheists like the Golden Rule as all-inclusive) and then directing people to that, as it would be better than larping.
I do not understand, you are aware of a genetic condition that produces an acquired immune deficiency that only affects the Semitic population? Can you provide a source for such a groundbreaking discovery?
the aids affects not only racemixing jews, but is typical to them.
its origin can probably be traced to racemixing with monkeys.
but this jewish genetic information is heavily censored if you can imagine.
φαρμακεία pharmakeía, far-mak-i'-ah; from G5332; medication ("pharmacy"), i.e. (by extension) magic (literally or figuratively):—sorcery, witchcraft.
Why would anyone work in pharmacy given what the Bible says about it?
Amen
Because the bible was written by bronze age goatherders trying to understand why Mt. Horeb rumbled....
I was citing a cultured Roman resident who resisted the empire for 60 years without change, enough to understand its view on pharmaceuticals. The Bible is not monolithic, learn history. And nobody has come up with a better explanation for how Horeb could have rumbled with words that are so sublime as to be still engraved on government halls today.
Good one...well except for all of the laws that existed way before. Besides that, fully half of them are about God being a jealous god and making sure people know that, and of those left, only two are anything that we actually have any laws covering, theft and murder.
Tell me again why they should be posted all over schools and public buildings when they don't even apply to every United States Citizen?
One Roman resident is your only source? Good Science,,,,
Do you wish to debate? I insist on having commitment to truth pursuit and use of straightforward binary propositions in that case.
Yeah, Hammurabi is sublime too (he's about the only one that qualifies for "all the laws before"), but somehow Moses got the cut and Hammurabi mostly didn't.
Yeah, a half-half balance between responsibility toward man and toward the holistic intelligence of the cosmos known as God is an excellent Self-Other paradigm. The cosmos must be upheld as unique and not divergent for any basic philosophy or theology to succeed, so its representative (Yahweh) would be naturally "jealous". (You could go from there into the ordinary atheist tropes about misunderstanding the cultural context of certain specific laws, but I'd rather you did that at c/Atheist and pinged me, so that we wouldn't be derailing u/LightBringerFlex.)
Yeah, the principles of respect for authority, regulation of marriage, and true testimony are enshrined through American and most other laws. If you want to nitpick about coveting, that one is a necessary demonstration that the internal (which is not generally covered by law, Mosaic or not) must still be cultivated as part of getting the external right.
If you object to how our government posts them, I suggest you take it up with them where they've discussed the matter in great detail, the Supreme Court. At risk of misquoting them, their position appears to be that upholding public morality for every citizen and resident is a proper function of a state that guarantees freedom of religion, and this is rightly done by recognizing the greater influence that some methods of upholding morality have historically had within our nation.
You brought up Horeb, so it's on you to advance discussion rather than to snark in AI echoes.
Getting back to OP, I was merely responding to OP by citing a supportive source and implying that the Biblical authority, such as it is, is a strong argument against the philosophy of pharmacy as a whole. For people who discount that authority, it would be a simple matter to cite recent science, starting with the person appointed to regulate that, Bobby Kennedy, and going back through such names as Kary Mullis and Linus Pauling. Since you have not expressed a single position relevant to OP, but were only triggered by a citation supportive of it to go on a tangent, I repeat that if you want to debate something then indicate your willingness to pursue truth wherever it leads and to select a meaningful binary proposition to see if I disagree.
I am pretty sure I am out of my depth debating any of this with your as your knowledge quite obviously supersedes any Gooberesque opinion I would have on the subject. Well played!
My only contribution is that if we are a nation built upon moral law, and that law comes from the Bible (which, while there is influence from biblical principles, I bristle at the idea that we were founded as a Christian Nation) why post the Ten Commandments of the old covenant? I think it would be much more effective that the Beatitudes were posted as they not only exist under the new covenant, but express the ideas and teachings of Jesus Christ than the Ten Commandments do, if you believe in that sort of thing, which I do not, and don't want to be forced to. I may not have a choice as this nation marches further and further into defacto autocratic Christian rule.
Thanks Mephisto, I larp as high-IQ in the hopes of making it someday.
Great question! It sounds cultural as if there's something about America that likes the Ten Words more than the Eight Blessings. I will bookmark that unanswered because it's probably a valid criticism that American churchianity is more comfortable putting Moses forward than Jesus in many circumstances, when you'd think they'd be willing to put Jesus first despite offense.
I will note though that we were literally constituted "in the year of our Lord" 1787, and by putting that clause in the Constitution the founders were all giving Jesus authority to lord this land indefinitely. Not that we're doing a great job, but better than some, with more to come. Since you find yourself stuck in a country with us constitutionists, I encourage you to make a lifelong pursuit of finding out the real law that transcends the Ten Words (many atheists like the Golden Rule as all-inclusive) and then directing people to that, as it would be better than larping.
Germ theory itself is sketch when you start to look into it, the founder Louis Pasteur conducted fraudulent experiments https://www.academia.edu/97750188/Biography_Louis_Pasteur_A_controversial_figure_in_a_debate_on_scientific_ethics There is much more on this out there
Germs and certainly "viruses" appear to be perennial Jewish scapegoat for their poisons.
vaccines contains jewish aids. ways to catch disease is directly from jews and from vaccines/ shedders.
nonwhites all have herpes because theyre a degenerate people.
they cant change their degenerate ways, so instead they use their aids filled syringes as weapons.
Define "jewish aids" please...
inherited aids in jewish populations.
I do not understand, you are aware of a genetic condition that produces an acquired immune deficiency that only affects the Semitic population? Can you provide a source for such a groundbreaking discovery?
the aids affects not only racemixing jews, but is typical to them. its origin can probably be traced to racemixing with monkeys. but this jewish genetic information is heavily censored if you can imagine.