Sam Altman is very calm during this interview with Tucker Carlson. He knows he has nothing to worry about. Suchir Balaji, the former OpenAI employee and whistleblower was Indian.
According to Talmud, Jëws can murder gentiles. Sanhedrin 57a:16 “If a Jëw murders a gentile, he is exempt … a Jëw may kill a gentile”.
It's about image. It may seem "indicting" to be interviewed like this but in reality it polishes their image. And they also know a lot of people know about this so it's not worth hiding.
Consider this. A journalist once created a documentary about Ronald Reagan when he was president. Bashing him in the most awful ways and showing what a fraud he is. But in the documentary she showed only nice images of him because thats what she could find. Do you know what? The pres office called her to thank her for the great publicity she gave him because what gets in the mind are the images not the words.
Altman: "do you believe" + Carlson: "it shakes the faith"
A sleight of hand from both about the nature of the narrative being make believe.
To believe implies holding onto a side within a conflict, in this case murder vs suicide aka staking ones faith. While doing that one ignores that nature continues to move, which thereby shakes ones staked position loose.
To resolve the conflict (murder vs suicide) one needs to resist the wanted temptation to turn against (versus) by choosing one side over the other. Only then can one discern that suicide implies murder and vice versa. Taking from others or from self ignores all given.
Sam Altman is very calm during this interview with Tucker Carlson. He knows he has nothing to worry about. Suchir Balaji, the former OpenAI employee and whistleblower was Indian.
According to Talmud, Jëws can murder gentiles. Sanhedrin 57a:16 “If a Jëw murders a gentile, he is exempt … a Jëw may kill a gentile”.
Why are they so fn weird?
Zuck, Elon, Bezos and this guy that they get to be the face of their Darpa projects are so uncanny.
Jessie Eisenberg should play Sam Altman in the movie
I don't trust Kabbalah Carlson much either, why are these Altman and Bankman-Fried appearing on his show?
It's about image. It may seem "indicting" to be interviewed like this but in reality it polishes their image. And they also know a lot of people know about this so it's not worth hiding.
Consider this. A journalist once created a documentary about Ronald Reagan when he was president. Bashing him in the most awful ways and showing what a fraud he is. But in the documentary she showed only nice images of him because thats what she could find. Do you know what? The pres office called her to thank her for the great publicity she gave him because what gets in the mind are the images not the words.
It's interesting, I do agree that showing positive images can appear to help.
Sam Altman says he believes murdered whistleblower committed suicide.
https://in.mashable.com/tech/99868/openai-ceo-sam-altman-on-jobs-ai-will-take-over-and-those-it-cant
A sleight of hand from both about the nature of the narrative being make believe.
To believe implies holding onto a side within a conflict, in this case murder vs suicide aka staking ones faith. While doing that one ignores that nature continues to move, which thereby shakes ones staked position loose.
To resolve the conflict (murder vs suicide) one needs to resist the wanted temptation to turn against (versus) by choosing one side over the other. Only then can one discern that suicide implies murder and vice versa. Taking from others or from self ignores all given.