Remotely, but I see people jumping to conclusions all the time. A criminal gets let out and they say "it's because he is black", but when a white criminal is also let out they don't notice.
The whole "they are privileged, I am jealous" mindset is not healthy anyway.
I'd preach the gospel to Rampage. Right now he is clearly a faux Christian. He claimed to be "born again" but no evidence of a life change, and he preaches universalism.
One can only twist what's already turned against one another, hence black vs white; offense vs defense; right vs wrong; humane vs inhumane; accept vs deny etc.
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to consent from both sides to a mutual conflict (reason) against each other, which only then permits a jew to further twist it aka to squeeze conflict for all it's worth, hence "war is a racket"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket
Holding onto white or black implies materialism. Once held onto either; both sides establish a dia-lect.
In nature...material (life) cannot hold onto either side (inception towards death) of motion. There's no dialect/argument/conflict of reason in-between inception and death...only within the mind/memory of ignorant life.
Being implies destitution (life) during purification (inception towards death)...choosing either side destroys ones sight within the visible spectrum of light.
Only one side is even remotely correct, though.
Remotely, but I see people jumping to conclusions all the time. A criminal gets let out and they say "it's because he is black", but when a white criminal is also let out they don't notice.
The whole "they are privileged, I am jealous" mindset is not healthy anyway.
You wouldn't dare say "you have poor impulsive control and rush to violence as your only solution" to his face.
I'd preach the gospel to Rampage. Right now he is clearly a faux Christian. He claimed to be "born again" but no evidence of a life change, and he preaches universalism.
lol he says that as if he expects people to willingly get their face smashed in by someone who is possibly unhinged.
That's the marxist twist.
One can only twist what's already turned against one another, hence black vs white; offense vs defense; right vs wrong; humane vs inhumane; accept vs deny etc.
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to consent from both sides to a mutual conflict (reason) against each other, which only then permits a jew to further twist it aka to squeeze conflict for all it's worth, hence "war is a racket"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket
From a different angle: Holding onto one side; while fighting one holding onto the other side implies "dialectical materialism"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectical_materialism
Holding onto white or black implies materialism. Once held onto either; both sides establish a dia-lect.
In nature...material (life) cannot hold onto either side (inception towards death) of motion. There's no dialect/argument/conflict of reason in-between inception and death...only within the mind/memory of ignorant life.
Being implies destitution (life) during purification (inception towards death)...choosing either side destroys ones sight within the visible spectrum of light.