The result? Bohm was targeted in the McCarthy era. Accused of communist ties. He lost his job at Princeton. Blacklisted. His passport revoked. Forced into exile in Brazil. His name became radioactive in American science.
Because he was a communist jew. Not for his science.
Thanks for admitting everything I said is true. Notice how the subhuman kike responds even when someone doesn’t disagree with what it’s saying. That’s because it’s paid to post here and can’t deviate from its script.
I admittedly did not entirely grasp the theory itself.
Physics isn't my strong point.
I am naturally distrustful of Einstein and these other jews. It's in their nature to lie. Jews do not have the reputation for telling truth. Seems to me they were mostly involved in assisting in the development of bombs to murder non-jews with.
Besides, arguing about this physics theory doesn't seem to be an immediate solution for the problems pressing us. We currently live in a Zionist Occupied Government and at any point in the near future the volume can be turned up and the oppression against Whites carried out swiftly.
They have all been wrong bcz they alienate the matter or densities in a field from the field by giving energetic values foreign of the field boundaries which makes for too much information requiring too much empty space to accommodate.
RFT is a far better model bcz the field is symbiotic and entirely variant energetic moments reflecting to create densities and explains 'dark' as an inherent state
a) Variable implies subject to change...only within change can there be variation.
b) Change cannot be hidden; the variables within change can choose to ignore being changed, hence hiding from the ever revealing change by free will of choice.
c) Real implies response (re) by variable to all (al)...a separation; not a connection.
d) Con (together) nectere (to bind)...that's fiction. Only each ones free will of choice can bind together what reality separates from one another.
Consenting to any suggestion implies binding together (synthesis); being perception within perceivable implies setting apart (analysis).
Because he was a communist jew. Not for his science.
Lol, k.
Prop up your narrative with false accusations and you’re going to get blown the fuck out.
S
T
F
U
u/tallesthooknose
Thanks for admitting everything I said is true. Notice how the subhuman kike responds even when someone doesn’t disagree with what it’s saying. That’s because it’s paid to post here and can’t deviate from its script.
Dhixjdbbxhdjdn jdhhejwksjdbebeh u/tallestretard
Tallestskil's suspicions seem to be correct to me
This guy worked with kikes
Was approved by kikes
Chased off when accused of being a communist jew
And no one explains why McCarthy was wrong. The government and our Institutions are indeed infiltrated with Marxist jews.
Are we incorrect about any of these points?
Whatever. Thats not what the post was about. I dont care about the fake soap opera for intellectuals to observe and judge.
I admittedly did not entirely grasp the theory itself.
Physics isn't my strong point.
I am naturally distrustful of Einstein and these other jews. It's in their nature to lie. Jews do not have the reputation for telling truth. Seems to me they were mostly involved in assisting in the development of bombs to murder non-jews with.
Besides, arguing about this physics theory doesn't seem to be an immediate solution for the problems pressing us. We currently live in a Zionist Occupied Government and at any point in the near future the volume can be turned up and the oppression against Whites carried out swiftly.
At the heart of quantum mechanics lies a paradox.
Particles behave randomly. No clear cause. No predictability.
Einstein hated this.
He famously said: "God does not play dice with the universe."
Bohm agreed. To understand Bohm's heresy…
You need to know what physics believed at the time.
According to Bohr and Heisenberg:
• Particles didn’t exist until observed • Reality was probabilistic • There was no “objective truth” beneath the math
But Bohm said: No.
But he went further…
Bohm said the visible world is the “Explicate Order”—just the surface.
Beneath it lies the “Implicate Order”—an unseen realm where everything is folded into everything else.
Consciousness, matter, time?
Not separate.
Just expressions of the same hidden source. Particles aren’t random. They’re guided by a hidden force.
This field — Bohm argued — exists beyond space and time.
An invisible wave that connects everything.
He called it: “The Implicate Order.”
This idea was radical. Too radical.
Sounds like 4th dimension theory
a hidden force we cannot observe or identify because we are in three dimensional realm consciously
You have to believe before you see. It keeps the retards from accidentally going there, in the name of freedom.of course. # creatorshite
Tell me you don't know who lysenko is without telling me you don't know who lysenko is
I know all about who he is. He’s the dipshit who thought chromosomes don’t exist. The fuck does that have to do with any of this?
The point is communist don't do any actual science, they say "The Science ™️" to justify their false beliefs.
They start at a conclusion and search for evidence to justify it and discard evidence against it.
The fact that he's a communist jew and "his science" was shit is one and the same.
Not only was McCarthy right, the only thing he can be criticized for is not going hard enough. The last 7 years proves it.
They have all been wrong bcz they alienate the matter or densities in a field from the field by giving energetic values foreign of the field boundaries which makes for too much information requiring too much empty space to accommodate.
RFT is a far better model bcz the field is symbiotic and entirely variant energetic moments reflecting to create densities and explains 'dark' as an inherent state
Energy (internal power) contradicts that.
a) What if all energy implies given value for each evaluating power within?
b) What if energy internally separating makes each power foreign to one another?
c) What if the expression of each power implies field/pelto/pele - "to spread"?
What if each matter within all motion implies sparse field? What if explaining this to others establishes a density (consent + suggestion)?
a) Sym (together) bio (to live)...how could life live together when intercourse for off-spring implies separation?
b) Wouldn't symbiosis bind fields, which ignores life wielding FREE will of choice?
What if one (matter) within all (motion) doesn't need to accommodate with one another, yet is tempted to want to?
How could anything within energy be too much or too little? Isn't that just drawing comparisons to one another, while ignoring all energy?
https://xcancel.com/thedarshakrana/status/1951391260281053641
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1951391260281053641.html?utm_campaign=topunroll
a) Variable implies subject to change...only within change can there be variation.
b) Change cannot be hidden; the variables within change can choose to ignore being changed, hence hiding from the ever revealing change by free will of choice.
c) Real implies response (re) by variable to all (al)...a separation; not a connection.
d) Con (together) nectere (to bind)...that's fiction. Only each ones free will of choice can bind together what reality separates from one another.
Consenting to any suggestion implies binding together (synthesis); being perception within perceivable implies setting apart (analysis).