They have all been wrong bcz they alienate the matter or densities in a field from the field by giving energetic values foreign of the field boundaries which makes for too much information requiring too much empty space to accommodate.
RFT is a far better model bcz the field is symbiotic and entirely variant energetic moments reflecting to create densities and explains 'dark' as an inherent state
They have all been wrong bcz they alienate the matter or densities in a field from the field by giving energetic values foreign of the field boundaries which makes for too much information requiring too much empty space to accommodate.
RFT is a far better model bcz the field is symbiotic and entirely variant energetic moments reflecting to create densities and explains 'dark' as an inherent state
Energy (internal power) contradicts that.
a) What if all energy implies given value for each evaluating power within?
b) What if energy internally separating makes each power foreign to one another?
c) What if the expression of each power implies field/pelto/pele - "to spread"?
What if each matter within all motion implies sparse field? What if explaining this to others establishes a density (consent + suggestion)?
a) Sym (together) bio (to live)...how could life live together when intercourse for off-spring implies separation?
b) Wouldn't symbiosis bind fields, which ignores life wielding FREE will of choice?
What if one (matter) within all (motion) doesn't need to accommodate with one another, yet is tempted to want to?
How could anything within energy be too much or too little? Isn't that just drawing comparisons to one another, while ignoring all energy?