It was right before 2020 election. Tucker was the only one covering it and then one day he was like "this is a personal matter, blah blah blah" and never spoke of it again.
What he lied about was suggesting that he didn't get the job.
Their job is to channel as much right wing voter sentiment as possible into the republican party. There's agents on the other side channeling the leftists. What they don't want is third parties or abandonment of the two fake political parties jews have setup for you. They want you, the voter, to feel "franchised." Tucker speaking on issues you care about keeps you tethered to right wing politics.
What they don't want is something like a White Nationalist movement, in which Whites could unify and vote for their own interests instead of infinite shitskins, niggers, kikes, faggots, dildo strapped dykes that you get via jew uniparty.
Context: Tucker recently interviewed Candace Owens where the subject of his father was brought up and he said he only found out about his father's CIA ties after he died
he mentions "worked in conjunction with CIA" in first clip, then is saying he was shocked to learn that he was actual CIA.
maybe he just assumed he was a contractor of some sort, or simply was in frequent communication with them, without actually being a CIA employee? i think there is sufficient difference in the context to give tucker benefit of the doubt, given that i'm not aware of any other incidents of tucker being greasy/fraudulent in this regard.
for example, from wiki:
"In the summer of 1986, U.S. President Ronald Reagan announced his intention to nominate Carlson as an associate director of the United States Information Agency to succeed Ernest Eugene Pell.
Carlson became director of Voice of America, a U.S. government-funded, state-owned multimedia agency which serves as the United States federal government's official institution for non-military, external broadcasting.[18] It broadcasts 24 hours a day in nearly 50 languages to more than 130 million people around the world, with a full-time staff of 3,000 and a part-time staff of 1,200. Carlson was the longest-serving director in VOA's 50-year history."
it would only make sense that, in these government positions, he would of course be working "in conjunction with" (aka liasing with) the CIA, frequently, for whatever intelligence operation was at hand.
what tucker says makes sense to me. he would indeed be aware that his father often worked in collaboration with CIA, and not be afraid to say that, while not necessarily learning that he was directly working as part of the CIA until later.
i like nick but he seems to be ignoring the context for this, unintentionally, i hope. you could say it's a matter of semantics, but tucker isn't the one who is committing a semantical mistake here, he was unambiguous in his choice of words imo. "in conjunction with" here can only really mean "collaborating with while still remaining separate from". if you try to extract another meaning from it then you are twisting someone's words i'm afraid.
Because tucker himself is CIA?
People seem to have forgotten when he got the call about the Hunter Biden laptop and completely dropped coverage.
How can people forget about something they have no knowledge of? Or are you just gaslighting?
It was right before 2020 election. Tucker was the only one covering it and then one day he was like "this is a personal matter, blah blah blah" and never spoke of it again.
Tucker Carlson says he applied for a position with the C.I.A. Was this before or after his father died?
What he lied about was suggesting that he didn't get the job.
Their job is to channel as much right wing voter sentiment as possible into the republican party. There's agents on the other side channeling the leftists. What they don't want is third parties or abandonment of the two fake political parties jews have setup for you. They want you, the voter, to feel "franchised." Tucker speaking on issues you care about keeps you tethered to right wing politics.
What they don't want is something like a White Nationalist movement, in which Whites could unify and vote for their own interests instead of infinite shitskins, niggers, kikes, faggots, dildo strapped dykes that you get via jew uniparty.
Thanks. I didn't know about that. But, I don't really care. I know Tucker Carlson is controlled opposition ... from his actions. I know he's a kabbalist from the red string on his hand. I know he's a freemason because he said so: https://rumble.com/v6spam3-tucker-carlson-reveals-himself-as-a-freemason.html?ysclid=mdtptnjkeg827002968
https://xcancel.com/NickJFuentes/status/1951414213047402571
Context: Tucker recently interviewed Candace Owens where the subject of his father was brought up and he said he only found out about his father's CIA ties after he died
https://xcancel.com/etherXwave/status/1951351841184248314
he mentions "worked in conjunction with CIA" in first clip, then is saying he was shocked to learn that he was actual CIA.
maybe he just assumed he was a contractor of some sort, or simply was in frequent communication with them, without actually being a CIA employee? i think there is sufficient difference in the context to give tucker benefit of the doubt, given that i'm not aware of any other incidents of tucker being greasy/fraudulent in this regard.
for example, from wiki:
"In the summer of 1986, U.S. President Ronald Reagan announced his intention to nominate Carlson as an associate director of the United States Information Agency to succeed Ernest Eugene Pell.
Carlson became director of Voice of America, a U.S. government-funded, state-owned multimedia agency which serves as the United States federal government's official institution for non-military, external broadcasting.[18] It broadcasts 24 hours a day in nearly 50 languages to more than 130 million people around the world, with a full-time staff of 3,000 and a part-time staff of 1,200. Carlson was the longest-serving director in VOA's 50-year history."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Carlson#Voice_of_America
it would only make sense that, in these government positions, he would of course be working "in conjunction with" (aka liasing with) the CIA, frequently, for whatever intelligence operation was at hand.
what tucker says makes sense to me. he would indeed be aware that his father often worked in collaboration with CIA, and not be afraid to say that, while not necessarily learning that he was directly working as part of the CIA until later.
i like nick but he seems to be ignoring the context for this, unintentionally, i hope. you could say it's a matter of semantics, but tucker isn't the one who is committing a semantical mistake here, he was unambiguous in his choice of words imo. "in conjunction with" here can only really mean "collaborating with while still remaining separate from". if you try to extract another meaning from it then you are twisting someone's words i'm afraid.
O.K. But he admitted it in both the before and after clip. So, can you detail to me what exactly the lie is?