That's not how chemistry works, retard. There are literally only two hydrogen atoms in every water molecule, you can't just magically "make more". And that's literally technology from the year 1800, using electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. That paki scammer invented nothing.
a) Hydro-GEN + oxy-GEN implies each water and air particle within the whole process of generation.
b) Few suggest the synthetic words hydrogen and oxygen to distract consenting many from GEN dividing HYDRO and OXY from one another, hence allowing analysis or in this example "hydrolysis".
c) Reasoning (more vs less) tempts one to ignore the implication of being one within all aka partial within whole aka potential within procession aka generated within generation aka growth within loss aka temporal within ongoing etc.
d) Magic/magi/magh - "to be able"...nature enabling being implies natural analysis; being enabling each other implies artificial synthesis.
As in...all perceivable separating each ones perception (natural magic) or ones consent holding onto the suggestion of another (artificial magic).
Wow, he “invented” hydrolysis. And in so doing created an engine horrifically less efficient than ICEs.
He didnt invent it but he hasn't died yet.
Hydrogen fuel cells aren't anywhere near new, and neither is making hydrogen from water.
No one said new, doorknob.
Do you not know what the word "inventor" means, ESL?
Yeah, bitch, he invented the attachment that he could make more of. He invented the kit. You some kinda retarded bot?
That's not how chemistry works, retard. There are literally only two hydrogen atoms in every water molecule, you can't just magically "make more". And that's literally technology from the year 1800, using electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. That paki scammer invented nothing.
You idiot
a) Hydro-GEN + oxy-GEN implies each water and air particle within the whole process of generation.
b) Few suggest the synthetic words hydrogen and oxygen to distract consenting many from GEN dividing HYDRO and OXY from one another, hence allowing analysis or in this example "hydrolysis".
c) Reasoning (more vs less) tempts one to ignore the implication of being one within all aka partial within whole aka potential within procession aka generated within generation aka growth within loss aka temporal within ongoing etc.
d) Magic/magi/magh - "to be able"...nature enabling being implies natural analysis; being enabling each other implies artificial synthesis.
As in...all perceivable separating each ones perception (natural magic) or ones consent holding onto the suggestion of another (artificial magic).
Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Bay-city-rollers-you-made-me-believe-in-magic-lyrics
Unless he also discovered some amazing catalyst that lowers the energy needed to split water, he has nothing but a gimmick.