The beginning of the absolute end; a compilation
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Which the Govt could label as anything that stops their agenda. Without BIBLICAL CHRISTIANITY, you know the govt will always levy it unfavorably and use false labels. Humans are sinful by nature, so censorship will ALWAYS, ALWAYS favor the elite Govt over the regular poor Citizen.
We have seen the fruits of censorship, and the fruits of free speech, and the latter has borne superior fruit in the end.
Mabye do that country by county. Let the counties decide.
If this happens then bystanders can step in.
Exactly. This is why I favor a government that is informed by and consistent with Christian morality.
You have seen the fruits of censorship in the hands of antichristian dehumanizing regimes. What you're saying is "I've seen a guy murdering in cold blood, therefore guns are bad". Censorship is a weapon and a tool. If it is in the right hands (a Christian state) it will be used righteously and justly.
What are they exactly? Are you happy with the way things are in the places where free speech thrived the most?
So majority decides what's morally right now? I thought the Bible was your moral authority?
Imagine a Brave New World society where this is normalized and nobody minds public indecency. We're certainly getting there. But that's not what I asked - I asked should it be allowed or should it be made illegal even if the majority was ok with it?
"I have seen gayness being used for evil. But it can be used for good!" ~ some dem somewhere
Oh wow. Almost as if they PREFER it because it advantages bad more than it advantages good! plus, censoring info and opinions is a sign of cowardice. Valid ideas need not hide from invalid ones. The invalid ones need to hide from valid ones.
"censorship's bad" is common sense. No wonder you want to sense-or.
It is VASTLY easier to censor than to use wepons to kill. This easiness behaves like a force multiplier. And sadly, censorship has signifcantly less stigma than violence (it should have almost as much, like 87%+ of the stigma) has.
Not to censor ideas/worldviews, though.
Massive redpills?? Lived saved from not getting the c19 vax? Wake up to the ones controlling power positoons???? Mass wake-up to the fact the world is run by evil secret elite????? More knowing about the Epstien files?? Knowledge of p3d0s in high places???? I could ramble for HOURS on that. You have almost nothing on your side.
You're not happy with the way things are in the places where censoring thrived the most. Better to have had a period of greatness, then fall into tyranny, than always having been in tyranny.
Now you are being goofy. That has nothing to do with "voting on things makes something morally right". That has to do with "Let the counties choose to or not to censor."
Most people in the USA at least, hate public indecency. Let me guess, you actually believe the "50% of the usa is woke!" fake news demoralization psy op. That would explain why you prefer censoring.
Not because "fReEdoM bAd!!1!1" is true, but because "people reject the Bible" is true.
God determines what is right and wrong. Each county should decide. People will call good evil and evil good, so no, if you try to censor degenism people WILL a) label everything as that to muddy the waters, so mostly everything or mostly nothing will be censored, or B) target Christianity as "evil", and pron/LGTB-ism as good. People can work around cemsoring, so degenism will endlessly pop up. But if you refute them and prove them wrong, they will either convert - or be exposed as having nothing and being stuck with that realization.
Idea: If you wanna remove a bad thing, have a vote. So people can vote on if it is actually bad or not.
Again, have individuals argue them to belief in Christianity.
Degenism has a source. Debate the source.
Look how that's working for you. I can't believe a self-proclaimed Christian can look around the western world today and say it's better than 50,100,200, etc years ago.
You're out of touch with reality, dude. 99% of people don't care about arguments for Christianity or any other thing. Do you know why? Because people today are not rational beings and are susceptible to biases, weak-mindedness, deception and psychological manipulation since Satan deceived Eve in the garden.
People are literally arguing over the number of genders, if men can become women, if homos can get married, if human babies should be killed in the womb and you consider that a win? Just 60 years ago those debates were unthinkable by anyone in their right mind. "Just debate, bro". You may want to check what the Overton window is.
Your free speech and debating are digging us deeper and deeper. But hey, never mind the ever increasing insanity, degeneracy and godlesness - at least we're not censoring people and we're letting majority decide how society is ran (imagine believing this) - I'm sure God will be pleased with that. It's not like He decimated entire nations for much less than what we're committing as a society daily.
Loool you got wound up over the end of my reply. Censorship fans in shambles.
"I have seen gayness being used for evil. But it can be used for good!" ~ some dem somewhere
Oh wow. Almost as if they PREFER it because it advantages bad more than it advantages good! plus, censoring info and opinions is a sign of cowardice. Valid ideas need not hide from invalid ones. The invalid ones need to hide from valid ones.
"censorship's bad" is common sense. No wonder you want to sense-or.
It is VASTLY easier to censor than to use wepons to kill. This easiness behaves like a force multiplier. And sadly, censorship has signifcantly less stigma than violence (it should have almost as much, like 87%+ of the stigma) has.
Not to censor ideas/worldviews, though.
Massive redpills?? Lived saved from not getting the c19 vax? Wake up to the ones controlling power positoons???? Mass wake-up to the fact the world is run by evil secret elite????? More knowing about the Epstien files?? Knowledge of p3d0s in high places???? I could ramble for HOURS on that. You have almost nothing on your side.
You're not happy with the way things are in the places where censoring thrived the most. Better to have had a period of greatness, then fall into tyranny, than always having been in tyranny.
Now you are being goofy. That has nothing to do with "voting on things makes something morally right". That has to do with "Let the counties choose to or not to censor."
Most people in the USA at least, hate public indecency. Let me guess, you actually believe the "50% of the usa is woke!" fake news demoralization psy op. That would explain why you prefer censoring.
Not because "fReEdoM bAd!!1!1" is true, but because "people reject the Bible" is true.
God determines what is right and wrong. Each county should decide. People will call good evil and evil good, so no, if you try to censor degenism people WILL a) label everything as that to muddy the waters, so mostly everything or mostly nothing will be censored, or B) target Christianity as "evil", and pron/LGTB-ism as good. People can work around cemsoring, so degenism will endlessly pop up. But if you refute them and prove them wrong, they will either convert - or be exposed as having nothing and being stuck with that realization.
Degenism has a source. Debate the source.
Vote can have many forms. As in click up or down on social media or something. As in vote on what teacher you prefer. Many forms.
Look how censoring is working for YOU.
UK, EU, CHYNA, islam countries, and numerous others.
Didn't say it was better now. Where did you get such a conclusion from? Can't believe a self proclaimed Christian thinks silencing opponents is good! The righteous are as "bold as a LION". Not "quick to reach the "SHUT IT DOWN" button", implying fear of the idea. Thank the federal reserve and irs and deepstate. No amount of censorship will make the deepstate go away.
"The Truth will set you free." Not "The Truth will make you silence different beliefs".
"Again, have individuals argue them to belief in Christianity."
"Planting seeds" is a thing. Repetition can rile em up. You VASTLY underestimate the Power of them.
Even if true, the precious censorship will not move the needle an inch to your side. In fact, doing so will only repulse people from Christianity. Making it look tyrannical. People like YOU are why athiests claim Christianity is "tYrAnnNiCaL!1!1".
The marketplace of ideas is like a tool too. Just because its let some bad things happen occasionally doesn't mean it's all bad!
You think censorers will be magically immune to this?? LOL. Trusting power to censor in the hands of a few is ludicrous.
All of which are hugely unpopular and indefensible. It is our responsibility to learn, be logical - but we UTTERLY FAILED at this responsibility. Censorship is a mere CRUTCH for the irresponsible.
Lemme guess, the federal govt wasn't busting down the doors of people who criticized it? More people were CONSISTENT WITH BIBLICAL TEACHINGS? More people were RESPONSIBLE? RATIONAL? And NOT pro-censoring?? The deepstate was much smaller & weaker? I bet you wish the 1st Amendment never existed and the Ministry of Truth was real.
It is going further to the right. Thank freedom of speech for that.
No. UnGodly people are. If you want to buy us more time, win souls over to Jesus instead of believing the indefensible, untrue idea that "SUPPRESSING IDEAS IS GREAT GUIZE!!" I've tried doing so in various areas.
EU, CCP, UK, islamic places, and counting - all beg to differ. Given Trump is in power, the deepness has ground to a slow/stop, if not a reversal.
All those are being pushed by the MI nority and being astroturfed. You do know biden's "win" was a STEAL, right?
Imagine believing that the ones censoring would be infallible and invulnerable to corruption. :/
In your Utopia, can you scrutinize the censorers and question their actions? Are they treated equally under the law, or above it?
What fraction of censoring countries that exist today do you believe God is pleased with? 30%? 50%? 95%? Do you believe He is pleased with Chy-na or the EU?