The beginning of the absolute end; a compilation
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Loool you got wound up over the end of my reply. Censorship fans in shambles.
"I have seen gayness being used for evil. But it can be used for good!" ~ some dem somewhere
Oh wow. Almost as if they PREFER it because it advantages bad more than it advantages good! plus, censoring info and opinions is a sign of cowardice. Valid ideas need not hide from invalid ones. The invalid ones need to hide from valid ones.
"censorship's bad" is common sense. No wonder you want to sense-or.
It is VASTLY easier to censor than to use wepons to kill. This easiness behaves like a force multiplier. And sadly, censorship has signifcantly less stigma than violence (it should have almost as much, like 87%+ of the stigma) has.
Not to censor ideas/worldviews, though.
Massive redpills?? Lived saved from not getting the c19 vax? Wake up to the ones controlling power positoons???? Mass wake-up to the fact the world is run by evil secret elite????? More knowing about the Epstien files?? Knowledge of p3d0s in high places???? I could ramble for HOURS on that. You have almost nothing on your side.
You're not happy with the way things are in the places where censoring thrived the most. Better to have had a period of greatness, then fall into tyranny, than always having been in tyranny.
Now you are being goofy. That has nothing to do with "voting on things makes something morally right". That has to do with "Let the counties choose to or not to censor."
Most people in the USA at least, hate public indecency. Let me guess, you actually believe the "50% of the usa is woke!" fake news demoralization psy op. That would explain why you prefer censoring.
Not because "fReEdoM bAd!!1!1" is true, but because "people reject the Bible" is true.
God determines what is right and wrong. Each county should decide. People will call good evil and evil good, so no, if you try to censor degenism people WILL a) label everything as that to muddy the waters, so mostly everything or mostly nothing will be censored, or B) target Christianity as "evil", and pron/LGTB-ism as good. People can work around cemsoring, so degenism will endlessly pop up. But if you refute them and prove them wrong, they will either convert - or be exposed as having nothing and being stuck with that realization.
Degenism has a source. Debate the source.
You just copied your previous reply, dude.
Yes, because i thought you glossed over the rest of my reply to pick at only one section.
So you'll ignore it? I can't engage with all the points, I have other shit to do. We could be going in the weeds for eternity. I picked out the meta ones that allow me to explain why your underlying classical liberal framework is wrong and why it's incompatible with Christianity.
So why does God allow the devil and demons to lie and still go around, instead of put something in them that sends them to the lake of fire forever very soon after they tell a lie??