The beginning of the absolute end; a compilation
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Don't need to love Big Daddy Govt to be against degenism.
No, it is a threat to freemasony. Why do you think the cabal likes to censor? Censoring is the slavemason belief.
Only when it suits their Current Thing. Lefty youtube censored anti-vax stuff. They normally censor pro Right Wing views and try to "SHUT IT DOWN!!" Lefty censorship is well documented.
Nope, you just know that i condemned censorship.
Indeed, but you do have to support some level of censorship and be willing to impose decency laws.
By censorship I don't mean just suppression of information. I mean limiting behaviors and public propagation of ideas that are morally wrong and detrimental to society. This includes banning pride parades and drag queen story hour which also fall under freedom of speech and expression category. In general all criminalization of indecent behavior is censorship.
So should people be allowed to be fucking on the streets?
Which the Govt could label as anything that stops their agenda. Without BIBLICAL CHRISTIANITY, you know the govt will always levy it unfavorably and use false labels. Humans are sinful by nature, so censorship will ALWAYS, ALWAYS favor the elite Govt over the regular poor Citizen.
We have seen the fruits of censorship, and the fruits of free speech, and the latter has borne superior fruit in the end.
Mabye do that country by county. Let the counties decide.
If this happens then bystanders can step in.
Exactly. This is why I favor a government that is informed by and consistent with Christian morality.
You have seen the fruits of censorship in the hands of antichristian dehumanizing regimes. What you're saying is "I've seen a guy murdering in cold blood, therefore guns are bad". Censorship is a weapon and a tool. If it is in the right hands (a Christian state) it will be used righteously and justly.
What are they exactly? Are you happy with the way things are in the places where free speech thrived the most?
So majority decides what's morally right now? I thought the Bible was your moral authority?
Imagine a Brave New World society where this is normalized and nobody minds public indecency. We're certainly getting there. But that's not what I asked - I asked should it be allowed or should it be made illegal even if the majority was ok with it?
"I have seen gayness being used for evil. But it can be used for good!" ~ some dem somewhere
Oh wow. Almost as if they PREFER it because it advantages bad more than it advantages good! plus, censoring info and opinions is a sign of cowardice. Valid ideas need not hide from invalid ones. The invalid ones need to hide from valid ones.
"censorship's bad" is common sense. No wonder you want to sense-or.
It is VASTLY easier to censor than to use wepons to kill. This easiness behaves like a force multiplier. And sadly, censorship has signifcantly less stigma than violence (it should have almost as much, like 87%+ of the stigma) has.
Not to censor ideas/worldviews, though.
Massive redpills?? Lived saved from not getting the c19 vax? Wake up to the ones controlling power positoons???? Mass wake-up to the fact the world is run by evil secret elite????? More knowing about the Epstien files?? Knowledge of p3d0s in high places???? I could ramble for HOURS on that. You have almost nothing on your side.
You're not happy with the way things are in the places where censoring thrived the most. Better to have had a period of greatness, then fall into tyranny, than always having been in tyranny.
Now you are being goofy. That has nothing to do with "voting on things makes something morally right". That has to do with "Let the counties choose to or not to censor."
Most people in the USA at least, hate public indecency. Let me guess, you actually believe the "50% of the usa is woke!" fake news demoralization psy op. That would explain why you prefer censoring.
Not because "fReEdoM bAd!!1!1" is true, but because "people reject the Bible" is true.
God determines what is right and wrong. Each county should decide. People will call good evil and evil good, so no, if you try to censor degenism people WILL a) label everything as that to muddy the waters, so mostly everything or mostly nothing will be censored, or B) target Christianity as "evil", and pron/LGTB-ism as good. People can work around cemsoring, so degenism will endlessly pop up. But if you refute them and prove them wrong, they will either convert - or be exposed as having nothing and being stuck with that realization.
Idea: If you wanna remove a bad thing, have a vote. So people can vote on if it is actually bad or not.
Again, have individuals argue them to belief in Christianity.
Degenism has a source. Debate the source.