It's literally a "Save the children" bill that will allow the government to identify online noticers and/or keep them off mainstream platforms. It's a cohencidence that it's being pushed in Europe where they are arresting people, physically, for online posts. Do you want to dox yourself on this site right now? Because that's what's being proposed.
Second, this will reduce online porn by about the amount similar laws reduced "piracy" in the 2000s. Coomers will host sites outside of the EU, distribute through private chats, or use encrypted P2P. And, since it's more hidden, there sill be zero incentive for major porn distributors to block CP, snuff, bestiality etc. Pornhub got called out (correctly) for hosting CP because they were huge and notorious but if they were operating via private encrypted networks, no one would have even know about it. Not saying this is an effective way to deal with porn, but these laws won't do anything about the really bad stuff and might make it harder to expose.
Finally, you don't find porn online unless you go looking for it. All the major sites already have age gates, mostly based around either credit card or phone numbers, which will block any kid of a parent who gives any sort of crap. Beyond that, adults need to opt in. I didn't even know Steam hosted porn games (not surprised, though) because I never allowed NSFW content on my account. It's not a problem to any non-degenerate, but the laws to fight it create problems for people trying to speak truth to power, including the truth about porn.
Blocking porn will not change the minds, or even habits, of coomers. It will not protect children. What it will do is legitimise the corporate porn producers who are probably the ones pushing for it in the first place. The only game in town will be OnlyFans and Pornhub, which will be considered "safe" porn, because they follow the rules but despite the fact that they're both notorious for hosting CP and providing a platform for actual women to exploit themselves. What is the point of requiring IDs for individuals when Youtube literally pushes sexualized cartoon charaters on their "kids" platform?
They are fools, they cannot see even when it is explained to them. They cannot understand that it is this exact emotional reaction they're having that is being counted on to allow this through to begin with.
If governments cared about the damages of porn, they'd just ban porn
Do not argue with that guy. He has fully been seduced by the gospel of the Jewish God, He who demands joy in slavery, He who invents nothing but ways to torture and kill the gentiles, He who turned Western Civilization into a land of undeath, whose name is Elohim, Lord of the Hosts, Baal and Yahweh.
You think this is about porn?
It's literally a "Save the children" bill that will allow the government to identify online noticers and/or keep them off mainstream platforms. It's a cohencidence that it's being pushed in Europe where they are arresting people, physically, for online posts. Do you want to dox yourself on this site right now? Because that's what's being proposed.
Second, this will reduce online porn by about the amount similar laws reduced "piracy" in the 2000s. Coomers will host sites outside of the EU, distribute through private chats, or use encrypted P2P. And, since it's more hidden, there sill be zero incentive for major porn distributors to block CP, snuff, bestiality etc. Pornhub got called out (correctly) for hosting CP because they were huge and notorious but if they were operating via private encrypted networks, no one would have even know about it. Not saying this is an effective way to deal with porn, but these laws won't do anything about the really bad stuff and might make it harder to expose.
Finally, you don't find porn online unless you go looking for it. All the major sites already have age gates, mostly based around either credit card or phone numbers, which will block any kid of a parent who gives any sort of crap. Beyond that, adults need to opt in. I didn't even know Steam hosted porn games (not surprised, though) because I never allowed NSFW content on my account. It's not a problem to any non-degenerate, but the laws to fight it create problems for people trying to speak truth to power, including the truth about porn.
Blocking porn will not change the minds, or even habits, of coomers. It will not protect children. What it will do is legitimise the corporate porn producers who are probably the ones pushing for it in the first place. The only game in town will be OnlyFans and Pornhub, which will be considered "safe" porn, because they follow the rules but despite the fact that they're both notorious for hosting CP and providing a platform for actual women to exploit themselves. What is the point of requiring IDs for individuals when Youtube literally pushes sexualized cartoon charaters on their "kids" platform?
Don't be a useful idiot.
They are fools, they cannot see even when it is explained to them. They cannot understand that it is this exact emotional reaction they're having that is being counted on to allow this through to begin with.
If governments cared about the damages of porn, they'd just ban porn
Do not argue with that guy. He has fully been seduced by the gospel of the Jewish God, He who demands joy in slavery, He who invents nothing but ways to torture and kill the gentiles, He who turned Western Civilization into a land of undeath, whose name is Elohim, Lord of the Hosts, Baal and Yahweh.