Its amazing how many people think that the fake sugar is good for you. My partner rarely drinks pop, but when they did it was usually a diet something.
How many articles ive sent them, or how many times ive told them before they quit drinking it.
A growing body of evidence has increasingly linked diet sodas and other no- or low-calorie foods with weight gain — so much so that the World Health Organization issued an advisory in May 2023 saying not to use sugar substitutes for weight loss.
“Replacing free sugars with non-sugar sweeteners does not help people control their weight long-term,” Dr. Francesco Branca, director of WHO’s department of nutrition and food safety, said at the time.
Now, a new study may shed light on why consuming too much of the artificial sweetener sucralose could be counterproductive. Instead of the brain sending a signal to eat less, sucralose triggers an increase in appetite when consumed in a drink.
“Sucralose activates the area in the brain that regulates hunger, and that activation, in turn, is linked to greater ratings of hunger,” said lead study author Dr. Katie Page, an associate professor of medicine and pediatrics and director of the Diabetes and Obesity Research Institute at the University of Southern California’s Keck School of Medicine in Los Angeles.
In fact, people who drank water with sucralose said their appetite increased by nearly 20% compared with drinking water with table sugar, Page said.
You know were only animals, pretty basic ones at that. The elite and the rich know this, and they use that to their advantage. Most of this food is engineered to keep us hungry and craving more junk in a endless cycle.
Let alone the health risks associated with it, even though current guidelines claim that its fine to consume and there is zero chance of risk of cancer.
“The most compelling finding was that a contaminant and metabolite of sucralose could damage DNA in human blood cells and express genes in human gut epithelium that can induce inflammation and even cancer.”
I worry about the fructose corn syrup, but I worry less about that than I do something like sucralose or aspartame. Been trying to drink more milk lately and had a glass the other morning. For some reason I was really feeling the need to vomit, my body really doesnt like milk.
Lmao I burned my arm a few weeks back, about the size of a quarter. The skin doesnt want to grow back, my phosphorous levels are fucked I guess. Id worry its the diabbetus, but I can still fast for 24 hours which is something I dont think I could do if I was even borderline and normal cuts heal fine. More likely to be the chronically low phosphate.
All nature offers implies same; each being within implies difference...mass manufactured drinks and flavors are being suggested to shape alike consensus.
goals
There's only one goal within nature for each living being...death. Few suggest artificial goals to distract many from natural origin towards natural outcome.
Top vs bottom represents a conflict of reason among many...not the position of few, who direct from within and produce from without how many are reacting against one another.
Both God and ha'satan have a path to immortality. one is based on our physical life only, the other includes the fact that what we call life has a balancing process we go through after death.
One has to deal with the pouring out of bowls the other wont.
Each being implies growth potential (living) within the natural process of decay (dying).
Has implies "to own; to possess"...that's a rhetorical trick tempting one to sacrifice potential by trying to take possession during natural procession.
Nature doesn't have/has anything...it implies all giving. It's each being within which struggles with the need to adapt to given, while resisting the temptation to take from one another.
The wages of sin is death.
Consent implies wage; suggestion implies sin...if given/taken. Life cannot sustain itself by giving consent to one anther, while taking suggested information into possession, because doing that ignores the need to adapt to the process of dying.
That's why the wages of sin imply death.
Both God and ha'satan
There can be only one. Both implies suggested pluralism tempting ones perception to ignore singularity.
Ha'satan implies "adverse" aka turning against one another, while ignoring that singularity separates each unit within from one another within (life) a straight line (inception towards death).
In short...God implies all for each one within. Satan implies each ones free will of choice to turn from all against one another.
immortality
Aka living within (im) the dying (mort) of all (al).
life has a balancing process
a) Living (matter) within balance (momentum) of process (motion).
b) Possess (has) contradicts process.
after death
Before implies "forwarded being"; after/aft implies "away" aka way (inception towards death) forwarding being (life).
Living (matter) within process of dying (motion) implies the only position...before life implies motion; after life implies motion.
One has to deal with the pouring out of bowls the other wont.
a) Deal/dail - "to divide"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/deal hence DE (division) of AL (all) into each one. The deal with the devil implies with one another, when buying into (consent) what another sells (suggestion).
b) Pour/pure - "to flow, issue forth in a stream" implies natural flow issuing forth formed being.
Flow moves through form, which allows form to draw from it, as to purify self from the formed burdens (of sin) one chose to take on.
c) Wont implies want, which tempts one to ignore need. One doesn't need to do what others wont...one's tempted to want or not want to.
This is the mental illness I’m here to read.
Is that why they have Shabbos Coke?
They just use the Mexican coke recipe and put it in plastic with yellow caps.
The superior version. Get that og betus not the pancake topping new shit.
Diet coke has its place.
Its amazing how many people think that the fake sugar is good for you. My partner rarely drinks pop, but when they did it was usually a diet something.
How many articles ive sent them, or how many times ive told them before they quit drinking it.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/29/health/artificial-sweetener-sucralose-hunger-signals-wellness
You know were only animals, pretty basic ones at that. The elite and the rich know this, and they use that to their advantage. Most of this food is engineered to keep us hungry and craving more junk in a endless cycle.
Let alone the health risks associated with it, even though current guidelines claim that its fine to consume and there is zero chance of risk of cancer.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/a-chemical-found-in-common-artificial-sweetener-may-cause-dna-damage-cancer
I worry about the fructose corn syrup, but I worry less about that than I do something like sucralose or aspartame. Been trying to drink more milk lately and had a glass the other morning. For some reason I was really feeling the need to vomit, my body really doesnt like milk.
Lmao I burned my arm a few weeks back, about the size of a quarter. The skin doesnt want to grow back, my phosphorous levels are fucked I guess. Id worry its the diabbetus, but I can still fast for 24 hours which is something I dont think I could do if I was even borderline and normal cuts heal fine. More likely to be the chronically low phosphate.
All nature offers implies same; each being within implies difference...mass manufactured drinks and flavors are being suggested to shape alike consensus.
There's only one goal within nature for each living being...death. Few suggest artificial goals to distract many from natural origin towards natural outcome.
Elite implies "selection; choice" aka ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion.
Top vs bottom represents a conflict of reason among many...not the position of few, who direct from within and produce from without how many are reacting against one another.
Nature has growth and decay.
The wages of sin is death.
Both God and ha'satan have a path to immortality. one is based on our physical life only, the other includes the fact that what we call life has a balancing process we go through after death. One has to deal with the pouring out of bowls the other wont.
Each being implies growth potential (living) within the natural process of decay (dying).
Has implies "to own; to possess"...that's a rhetorical trick tempting one to sacrifice potential by trying to take possession during natural procession.
Nature doesn't have/has anything...it implies all giving. It's each being within which struggles with the need to adapt to given, while resisting the temptation to take from one another.
Consent implies wage; suggestion implies sin...if given/taken. Life cannot sustain itself by giving consent to one anther, while taking suggested information into possession, because doing that ignores the need to adapt to the process of dying.
That's why the wages of sin imply death.
There can be only one. Both implies suggested pluralism tempting ones perception to ignore singularity.
Ha'satan implies "adverse" aka turning against one another, while ignoring that singularity separates each unit within from one another within (life) a straight line (inception towards death).
In short...God implies all for each one within. Satan implies each ones free will of choice to turn from all against one another.
Aka living within (im) the dying (mort) of all (al).
a) Living (matter) within balance (momentum) of process (motion).
b) Possess (has) contradicts process.
Before implies "forwarded being"; after/aft implies "away" aka way (inception towards death) forwarding being (life).
Living (matter) within process of dying (motion) implies the only position...before life implies motion; after life implies motion.
a) Deal/dail - "to divide"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/deal hence DE (division) of AL (all) into each one. The deal with the devil implies with one another, when buying into (consent) what another sells (suggestion).
b) Pour/pure - "to flow, issue forth in a stream" implies natural flow issuing forth formed being.
Flow moves through form, which allows form to draw from it, as to purify self from the formed burdens (of sin) one chose to take on.
c) Wont implies want, which tempts one to ignore need. One doesn't need to do what others wont...one's tempted to want or not want to.