Grok is an LLM, it predicts what words it should generate based on the context you've provided and the data it's ingested (and then iterates continuously during generation, based on the context it is generating as it answers)
It does not lie nor can it be deceived because it does not have the faculties for such behavior
If you acknowledge it's a bot, how can you possibly think it has the faculties to lie or be deceived? If anything, my answer places far less confidence in the technology than yours
It can repeat lies without the critical thinking skills to test the lies for authenticity, accuracy, truthfulness. So it mines misinformation and helps recirculate lies and junk data
Yes, precisely. But to say it tells lies or is deceived is to humanize it, which is imo a huge conspiracy in and of itself. People will accept AI governance because they will think it's smarter than them because they've come to believe it actually "thinks", and use of language (e.g. referring to it as something with the capability to lie) is part of instilling that belief. I don't think OP is part of that aspect of the conspiracy, I think he's been swept up by it
a) Only CAUSE causes. Effects within cause are affecting each other.
b) Vaccines imply an artificial effect within a natural cause...utilized to affect one another, while distracting from cause.
finds no link
Foundation doesn't link together...it funds (matter) by action (inception towards death) aka a process of internal separation.
Consenting to a suggestion by another...like vaccines...establishes a link in-between consent and suggested or in other words...consent permits suggested to be injected into one.
Mainstream normie consumer AI = just another shill for CDC, AAP, fake news lies
Grok is an LLM, it predicts what words it should generate based on the context you've provided and the data it's ingested (and then iterates continuously during generation, based on the context it is generating as it answers)
It does not lie nor can it be deceived because it does not have the faculties for such behavior
A lot of confidence there in a bot. So it's open source and you checked it out?
If you acknowledge it's a bot, how can you possibly think it has the faculties to lie or be deceived? If anything, my answer places far less confidence in the technology than yours
It can repeat lies without the critical thinking skills to test the lies for authenticity, accuracy, truthfulness. So it mines misinformation and helps recirculate lies and junk data
Yes, precisely. But to say it tells lies or is deceived is to humanize it, which is imo a huge conspiracy in and of itself. People will accept AI governance because they will think it's smarter than them because they've come to believe it actually "thinks", and use of language (e.g. referring to it as something with the capability to lie) is part of instilling that belief. I don't think OP is part of that aspect of the conspiracy, I think he's been swept up by it
Grok is programed with preconceived morality similar to its creators and programmers, not God. Good luck!!!
So it's a jew golem.
Musk and Trump are so based though.
a) Only CAUSE causes. Effects within cause are affecting each other.
b) Vaccines imply an artificial effect within a natural cause...utilized to affect one another, while distracting from cause.
Foundation doesn't link together...it funds (matter) by action (inception towards death) aka a process of internal separation.
Consenting to a suggestion by another...like vaccines...establishes a link in-between consent and suggested or in other words...consent permits suggested to be injected into one.