Looking At Islam Vs Christianity
(m.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Choosing to stand-under puts one at odds with one another aka under vs over. Having choice implies being within "just" balance.
Others suggest the word "understanding" to tempt ones consent to "stand-under" the suggested, hence submitting self while seeking to understand others. That's a simple inversion spell.
a) Enemy implies "within me", hence ones consent permitting suggested words into ones mind/memory.
b) Speech implies articulation of sound aka artificial words shaped within natural sound aka spell-craft.
Example...a word is shape by LETTERS aka ones choice LETTING another one suggest words.
A suggested DEFINITION shapes one into a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound)...if consented to.
Not/nothing implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested, and it's based on creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
"Cause it's the deepest impulse of a jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread. They want nothing but nothingness. Nothingness without end"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k
wait are you, like, using the original language to make these....corrections? there's a purpose, i know it. do you want me to learn something from this?
sorry i never did find Seinfeld to be funny or educational
are you calling me a Jew?
a) Not alike one another...differentiated (life) from one another within sameness (inception towards death).
b) Origin of language implies sound. Language/lingua - "tongue" represents the split tongue when articulating words within natural sound.
As for sound... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
Free-will-of-choice DARES...
c) Correct vs incorrect implies a conflict of reason based on circular thinking (logic); while doing that one ignores cor (heart) rect/reg (to move in a straight line).
Ones heart (life) is being moved in a straight line (inception towards death)...others suggest logos (word) to tempt logic (circular thinking) into reason (turning against one another).
a) Purpose implies forwarded (inception towards death) position (life)...being implies pose within pur. Seeking to understand (stand-under) tempts one to ignore ones position.
b) To know implies ones perception within all perceivable, which any suggestion by another tempts one to ignore. Suggested tempts one free will of choice to bind itself to a side aka true or false; yes or no; belief or disbelief; agree or deny; upvote or downvote etc.
Whichever side one chooses puts one into conflict with the other side, which is called a conflict of reason. One needs to resist either SIDE to sustain ones SIGHT; otherwise inclining towards one side, while turning against another implies tunnel-vision aka a reduction of sight.
a) One needs to resist want. Others tempt one into a conflict of reason (want vs not want); which distracts both sides from need.
b) To teach self implies learning and to learn implies teaching self...others represent the temptation to ignore that.
Wanting to learn from a teacher implies slave selecting master. The difference between master/slave; leader/follower; teacher/student; few/many; suggestion/consent etc....are the different words used to distract one from like-minded behavior.
The inversion of chosen one implies one's choice, for it's one's choice which selects a chosen ones suggestion, and selection/choice implies "élite". Consent implies inversion of choice...suggestion is utilized by others to tempt ones free will of choice to willingly submit to inversion, and it's the easiest temptation to fall for...shirking response-ability onto another.
Only during drama (inception towards death) can there be humor (life), and education isn't by others, but from all through each one.
It's not about what others are suggesting, but what one draws from perceivable...the former tempts one to hold onto it as information; while the latter implies inspiration and cannot be held onto, since it moves.
Seinfeld implies his (sein) field (feld) of vision...not yours. And Jerry/jeremiah/yirmeyah - "may jehovah exalt" implies all giving to each one....not watching "seinfeld" as suggested by others.
If one claims self as "me; myself or I"; then every other one becomes a you (phonetic jew). Jesus aka je suis (I am) represents the suggested trick to establish the you/jew identity, which others are hiding behind.
One cannot destroy a jew/you without choosing to let go of "me; myself or I"...hence en-e-my implying "within me".
As for "call" aka order by way (inception towards death) of designation (life)...that implies each ones call of duty within all...not towards one another.
Ask yourself...do I C(see)ALL or do each others suggestions tempt one to ignore all perceivable?
YES.
Yes vs no aka a conflict of reason against others, based on ones circular logic...reasoning cannot dissolve the yes vs no conflict, only those fighting each other within it.
Hold your breath...does yes vs no reasoning prevent nature from forcing being into adaptation or is reasoning (vs) a distraction from implication (if/then) aka an artificial conflict distracting one from natural progression?
totally agree. you can't make something from nothing. there is a Creator
Being implies partial within total...agree vs disagree implies partials turned against each other, while ignoring totality.
Few suggest "summa totalis" to tempt many together into a sum of all things...that's the foundation for mosaic law; tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together); abrahamism (father of multitude) etc.
a) Make/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*mag-
Making represents the foundation for magic and masonry and amassing many together under control of few. Nature doesn't make...it separates whole into partials aka transformation of everything...not creation out of nothing.
b) Something implies sum-thing aka the sum of things put together, which tempts one to ignore being each thing (partial) withing everything (whole) set apart from one another.
c) If nothing represents ones denial of everything perceivable for the suggestions of one another; the others can make something out of nothing.
Using the word "nothing" implies ones consent to suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing). That's what establishes nothing (suggested) within one thing (perception) during everything (perceivable).
Whatever one holds onto mentally represents "nothing", because when holding onto suggested, one de-nies everything perceivable moving through ones perception.
Motion cannot be held onto...yet matter (life) within motion (inception towards death) has the free will of choice to deny being moved, while holding onto each others suggestions.
a) Being implies center (perception) of all (perceivable) aka here within everywhere. Others suggest "there and there or there etc." to tempt ones perception off-center.
One can only perceive HERE...if one goes over there, then at arrival one perceives HERE, not there. Choice (life) can only exist at the center of balance (inception/death)...not on either side.
There implies a suggested description; here implies the position of matter (life) within the momentum (inception towards death) of motion, which one ignores when holding onto any description aka division (de) of action (tion) by scripture (script).
b) Father (motion) > mother (momentum) > trans-formed off-spring (matter)...that ain't creation by creator, but transformation aka action (motion) transferring (momentum) form (matter).
Basic alchemy...separation of ingredients within base. The base cannot create anything; it was everything before each thing can come into being within it.
Effect can only come into being within cause aka reaction within action aka form within flow aka one within all aka partial within whole aka want within need aka expression within impression aka resistance within velocity aka living within process of dying.
A jew suggests creationism aka creatio ex nihilo to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore everything perceivable for suggested nothing.
Genesis 1:1 - "In the beginning; God created..."...that puts the generated (gin) being (be) before God.
That's the islamic gin/jinn/djin aka the shapshifter aka the genie in the bottle..."I'm a genie in a bottle...you gotta rub me the right way". To rub implies to anoint aka being the anointed one (christ).
https://genius.com/Christina-aguilera-genie-in-a-bottle-lyrics