wait are you, like, using the original language to make these....corrections?

a) Not alike one another...differentiated (life) from one another within sameness (inception towards death).

b) Origin of language implies sound. Language/lingua - "tongue" represents the split tongue when articulating words within natural sound.

As for sound... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics

• People talking without speaking; people hearing without listening
• People writing songs that voices never shared; and no one dared
• Disturb the sound of silence

Free-will-of-choice DARES...

c) Correct vs incorrect implies a conflict of reason based on circular thinking (logic); while doing that one ignores cor (heart) rect/reg (to move in a straight line).

Ones heart (life) is being moved in a straight line (inception towards death)...others suggest logos (word) to tempt logic (circular thinking) into reason (turning against one another).

there's a purpose, i know it.

a) Purpose implies forwarded (inception towards death) position (life)...being implies pose within pur. Seeking to understand (stand-under) tempts one to ignore ones position.

b) To know implies ones perception within all perceivable, which any suggestion by another tempts one to ignore. Suggested tempts one free will of choice to bind itself to a side aka true or false; yes or no; belief or disbelief; agree or deny; upvote or downvote etc.

Whichever side one chooses puts one into conflict with the other side, which is called a conflict of reason. One needs to resist either SIDE to sustain ones SIGHT; otherwise inclining towards one side, while turning against another implies tunnel-vision aka a reduction of sight.

do you want me to learn something from this?

a) One needs to resist want. Others tempt one into a conflict of reason (want vs not want); which distracts both sides from need.

b) To teach self implies learning and to learn implies teaching self...others represent the temptation to ignore that.

Wanting to learn from a teacher implies slave selecting master. The difference between master/slave; leader/follower; teacher/student; few/many; suggestion/consent etc....are the different words used to distract one from like-minded behavior.

The inversion of chosen one implies one's choice, for it's one's choice which selects a chosen ones suggestion, and selection/choice implies "élite". Consent implies inversion of choice...suggestion is utilized by others to tempt ones free will of choice to willingly submit to inversion, and it's the easiest temptation to fall for...shirking response-ability onto another.

i never did find Seinfeld to be funny or educational

Only during drama (inception towards death) can there be humor (life), and education isn't by others, but from all through each one.

It's not about what others are suggesting, but what one draws from perceivable...the former tempts one to hold onto it as information; while the latter implies inspiration and cannot be held onto, since it moves.

Seinfeld implies his (sein) field (feld) of vision...not yours. And Jerry/jeremiah/yirmeyah - "may jehovah exalt" implies all giving to each one....not watching "seinfeld" as suggested by others.

are you calling me a jew?

If one claims self as "me; myself or I"; then every other one becomes a you (phonetic jew). Jesus aka je suis (I am) represents the suggested trick to establish the you/jew identity, which others are hiding behind.

One cannot destroy a jew/you without choosing to let go of "me; myself or I"...hence en-e-my implying "within me".

As for "call" aka order by way (inception towards death) of designation (life)...that implies each ones call of duty within all...not towards one another.

Ask yourself...do I C(see)ALL or do each others suggestions tempt one to ignore all perceivable?