More I observe what's going on, more I find similar patterns
- both are from the core of the system. One from Socialist System, another from Capitalist System
- both had similar occupation - managing realty/building business
- both posed themselves as political opponents to the "swamp", actually making "swamp" even larger and deeper
- both like to tell they have other nation leaders as "friends"
- both immidiately forgot everything they promised
- both even look somewhat similar, taking in account typical for audience face features.
- Yeltsin ended with destruction of Union, seems Trump destroys relations with closest allies (except Israel, of course).
- both praise Jews and allow them around
- both wanted maximum privatisation, even in places that shouldn't be in private hands. Especially in Jewish hands.
- both do insane shit in public
- both listened endless "experts" and "aides" who obviously don't care about country, but about some special third-party interests, and then repeat all that shit as their own.
- both told about future economic succes and rise of population wealth, but did the opposite.
- both replaced senile demented leader.
- both called for great changes/reforms
- both love to talk about deals, with little and, if any, worst possible result.
Yeltsin ended bad. Nearly destroyed the whole country. Hated by nearly everybody here. Left giant heap of artificially created problems. Hopefully, successor he left in power, Putin, choose to abandon Yeltsin's path and had enough brains to understand that if he will continue Yeltsin's shit, he will completely lost his power to the Western and Jewish bosses and to prevent that, he has to really somehow lift Russia from knees and start to really exterminate "swamp" around. Not because he is a good guy and do what is best for people, but just to save his life.
If analogy is correct, then Trump will not save America, and a lot of shit will happen, but eventually Trump could clear the way for the next guy who, may be, finally began to do something useful.
Yeltsin also handpicked Vladimir Putin, who, it may be noted, is still in power. Fast-forward and the Russia that had been stomped into the dirt after the collapse of the USSR and the looting by the West:
So there's that, if people think that kind of stuff is an important legacy.
So, if parallel is correct, the right thing for Americans is at any cost to not allow Trump to completely destroy country during his term. Then, somebody, who is invisible today, from his surrounding will have a chance to make things better.
If the parallel holds true, it would mean something like, "Vote Vance 2050". Seems pretty surreal. Then again, Putin has been a body double for 15 years, so that's surreal too.
Strange world we live in.
Don't think it will be someone as public as Vance.
As for Putin's body double, it is even more surreal than you think - it doesn't really matter in case of Russia at least. Looks like anyone who would be in charge of Russia, eventually will turn on the side of Russia, not even as a country or nation, but as a space-time phenomenon. Endless examples in the history, since Ekaterine the Great who was German ethnically. Even Lenin in his last years turned against Trotsky and kind of prepared path for Stalin who exterminated Jewsih bolsheviks and completely destroyed their plans to burn Russia as a fuel in World Revolution (AKA installing Jewish World Order).
aw come on, have a little faith! ;) if Trump is a pawn i'll wanna fucking die, i'm woman enough to admit it. That would mean there is next to no hope
Things are much worse if Trump is not a pawn and doing all that shit because he think it will be right thing.
Apart from that - it is a very bad idea to wanna fucking die because yet another politician appeared as not what you think before elections. They all do that, it is a law of politics - never fulfill promises you gave to be elected.
Next to no hope will be when all Americans lose any hope. IDK, but taking in account that US is relatively young state mostly built from immigrants, so the ties between land and people is not fully formed, and Americans could easily decide to search for better life somewhere else, like their ancestors or they themselves did - that will be the end of USA. You shouldn't lose your hope under any conditions, if your country means something more for you than just a place where you only live and make money.
who will become the world's #1 superpower if we decide to go "nomad"?
China already is...
China is a paper tiger lmao. Stop sucking down the propaganda. They lie about everything and the only power they have is enslaving poor countries with their own fake currency to steal their real resources.
Nah it's u that's been censored to see what China's really like...they are living in the future with there tech and beautiful cities. Compared to the shithole states, China is way ahead.
Also people are united and love there country and would do anything for it while the states are on the brink of civil war...lmfao
Nobody. And nobody should. Look at all shit that started in the world at moment US declared itself "world's #1 superpower".
touche
well said, you're right. to be fair, my DEFAULT is wanting to fucking die haha
Will implies choice...chance tempts will to sacrifice choice. Chance implies gambling towards outcome; choice implies response-ability within origin.
Chance implies a jew tempting gentiles to choose gambling...gentiles willingly consent to do so by taking artificial chances. Nature cannot be taken since it moves, while motion gives free will of choice towards being.
Correcting the name, a post on Reddit was made the same claim a year ago:
(Israeli billionaire) Abramovich was the first person to recommend to Yeltsin that Vladimir Putin be his successor as the Russian president. When Putin formed his first cabinet as Prime Minister in 1999, Abramovich interviewed each of the candidates for cabinet positions before they were approved. (r/conspiracy 3/31/2024)
That post was deleted by the user. Everyone is free to decide whether it's paid shills or just dumdums that keep repeating it.
For anyone interested enough to want to dig a bit deeper into actual reality, there is this article concerning Valentin Yumashev, the person standing right next to Yeltsin guiding him on this issue:
The man who helped make ex-KGB officer Vladimir Putin a president (BBC 12/16/2019)
Every time the name Putin comes up, the shills shout "KGB" like the robots they are, but the article includes this interesting quote:
The anti-Putin drones should start shouting that he's a Democrat, because that seems a lot worse these days.
Only during loss (inception towards death) can there be growth (life)...a jew suggests "America + Russia" as growth and "Trump + Yeltsin" as loss to tempt gentiles to view both in conflict with one another.
Choosing sides within a conflict tempts each gentile off-center, hence preventing growth during loss.
Nature sets will free...a jew suggests gentiles to "save" whatever they desire by free "will" of choice, which in return binds free will of choice to a chosen ones suggestion.
Nature implies an ongoing solution for each temporary potential coming into being within...there cannot be any save-states within motion.