I mean...we are in the 1st or 2nd generation of LLM models. The iPhone was a piece of shit until about iPhone 3/4. Android was a piece of shit until android 7/8 ....
How about computers.. I got my first one in April 1997. Cost like 3900. 120mhz.. whole hard drive was 1.6gb. Then I paid an extra 500 bucks to get an SCSI card and a cd burner put in at a computer store. To have the drive space to burn a 700mb disk was pretty tight. lol. Then you've got the spinning hard drives.. that was a 5400.. 7200 was nice. But these SSD's are awesome.
Then the broadband internet. Back on dialup.. it took me 6 hours to download 100mb halo 1 multiplayer demo. First comp, was on 28kbps, so 56k was nice.. lol.
But yeah.. we've come a long way with that stuff. I've had this one for I don't know.. a while compared to back then when you'd have to get a new one every couple years cause the hardware was better. Operating systems too.. blue screens with window ME.. windows 7 was good. So.. it takes a while for this shit to work out how it's bad, early on.
Build something that by design absolutely can't do something, and then be amased it can't do that.
PS: No, "quantum computers" will not make thing that can't do something by design do that. It's like have a hope that if you make a spoon from gold, it become a fork.
No, it won't, because the problem is the architecture of the AI, not the lack of compute. Someone needs to first figure out the problem and then write about it, then the AI can figure it out. Perhaps a greater "reasoning" architecture will be able to govern the output but what we currently have is at best a facsimile of intelligence. The real conspiracy is tptb using the populace's ignorance to make them think this (admittedly, very useful) tool is in any way a real intelligence
Foundational sciences too fake and gay for anyone to make quantum computing actually work.
I mean...we are in the 1st or 2nd generation of LLM models. The iPhone was a piece of shit until about iPhone 3/4. Android was a piece of shit until android 7/8 ....
How about computers.. I got my first one in April 1997. Cost like 3900. 120mhz.. whole hard drive was 1.6gb. Then I paid an extra 500 bucks to get an SCSI card and a cd burner put in at a computer store. To have the drive space to burn a 700mb disk was pretty tight. lol. Then you've got the spinning hard drives.. that was a 5400.. 7200 was nice. But these SSD's are awesome.
Then the broadband internet. Back on dialup.. it took me 6 hours to download 100mb halo 1 multiplayer demo. First comp, was on 28kbps, so 56k was nice.. lol.
But yeah.. we've come a long way with that stuff. I've had this one for I don't know.. a while compared to back then when you'd have to get a new one every couple years cause the hardware was better. Operating systems too.. blue screens with window ME.. windows 7 was good. So.. it takes a while for this shit to work out how it's bad, early on.
Those were the good old days
It's complete, absolute idiocy.
Build something that by design absolutely can't do something, and then be amased it can't do that.
PS: No, "quantum computers" will not make thing that can't do something by design do that. It's like have a hope that if you make a spoon from gold, it become a fork.
No, it won't, because the problem is the architecture of the AI, not the lack of compute. Someone needs to first figure out the problem and then write about it, then the AI can figure it out. Perhaps a greater "reasoning" architecture will be able to govern the output but what we currently have is at best a facsimile of intelligence. The real conspiracy is tptb using the populace's ignorance to make them think this (admittedly, very useful) tool is in any way a real intelligence
Full sized screenshot: https://media.scored.co/post/W7qerrDfewpe.jpeg