If you want to analyze words, go read the Dictionary and analyze every single word in them. Then post them in 1 single place. Don't use everyone's comments and threads for your analysis and breakdowns.
Rebuting others' points and defending your own is a MUCH better mental excersise than any word analysis.
Wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that? Whaaaat?
No, "hell" is taken by some to mean "the grave", while popular belief is that it is the lake of fire.
--
By the way, what do YOU believe? Should people believe in Jesus and love Him, or is athiesm the true belief?
Need implicates (if/then)...reasoning (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore that.
to analyze words
To implies towards aka inception towards death analyzing life... words are synthesized together to distract from that.
go read the Dictionary
"Go read" implies dictating others what to do...free will of choice needs to resist what others want to dictate.
1 single place
Energy aka the place to be aka "all for one and one for all". Only within energy can there be placement.
Don't use everyone's comments and threads for your analysis and breakdowns.
Com (together) ment (mind)...nature sets each ones mind apart from one another; few within tempt the minds of many together into a "hivemind", which naturally inspires to be broken apart.
Rebuting others' points
Inception sentences life towards POINT of death...there's no other point for life. What one rebuts when making a point is ones life back into the process of dying.
MUCH better
Much vs little or better vs worse...always a conflict against others; never ones resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
Wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that? Whaaaat?
One cannot choose want without ignoring need. Nature supplies all needed; wanting from one another implies ignoring nature.
"hell" is taken by some to mean "the grave"
Growth (life) can only exist within loss (inception towards death) aka one can only live within the process of dying, hence the phrase "having one foot in the grave".
Ask yourself this...if a woman gets raped while experiencing "hell", then why can a woman giving birth can experience "heaven" at the same moment?
Also...ignoring perceivable for suggested implies the making of "graven" images aka idols/ideals. Notice also that you wrote that hell is TAKEN, just like ones consent takes suggested into possession.
lake of fire
Aka the lake (inception towards death) of fire (life), hence kindling (inception) and extinguishing (death) each formed flame (life) during flow.
What do the elderly complain most of? "It's too cold"...hence the heart/hearth/hertha - "burning place" burning out... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hearth
By the way, what do YOU believe?
To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring that ones perception is "by the way" of all perceivable.
Believe inverts "being alive"...if consented to.
Should people believe in Jesus and love Him
a) Should vs shouldn't love vs hate are conflicts of reason among believers. Free will of choice needs to resist the wanted temptation of holding onto any side, otherwise it binds itself to another.
b) Jesus aka je suis (I AM) implies taking possession over self, while ignoring to be temporary potential (life) within ongoing procession (inception towards death).
Jesus tempts one to ignore CHRIST (to anoint) aka the separation of each being from one another, when coming through the birth-channel.
Ones belief in jesus (i am) establishes every other one as a YOU (phonetic jew). That's what spell-craft can conceal behind such simple words, and those holding onto beliefs cannot see it, hence not analyzes it aka not break apart what their belief holds together.
is athiesm the true belief?
a) To believe implies ones consent to any suggested -ism, which only then shapes one into an -ist aka a follower.
b) Using THE implies ones consent to suggested the-ism, which makes one a-the-ist. Such a simple spell, and yet the majority cannot fathom it.
c) True vs false (reasoning about suggested) tempts one to ignore change aka the implication (if/then) of perceivable.
Nature cannot generate FALSE, nor does nature require anyone within to declare what's TRUE to one another. It's ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), which turns into a conflict of reason (true vs false).
If one adapts to change by implication (if/then), while resisting to choose a side within reason (true vs false), then one doesn't participate within a conflict against others, and can think straight instead of circular logic.
Perceivable inspiration moves straight through each ones perception, while suggested information tempts one to keep turning it within ones mind. That's a trick...a feedback loop.
Protestant vs Orthodox; Catholic; Baptist; Evangelical; Lutheran etc. Both sides are consenting to versus/verto - "to turn" aka turning against one another...NOT apart from one another.
Only each jew revolts by overturning gentiles inwardly (circular logic) and outwardly (conflicts of reason). To revolt implies "cast off allegiance, break away from established authority" hence remaining apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806 ...while surviving the mutual destruction of gentiles coming together within endless conflicts of reason.
Christen implies "to anoint", hence the separation of all into each one aka the coming into being of each anointed one through the birth-channel.
Protestants aren't Christian. They are rebellious, fallen, self centered scholars of Biblical writings.
What is needed to be saved?
To enter Heaven?
All perceivable is needed for each ones perception...wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that.
Entering (inception) towards exiting (death) implies heaving (to lift, raise; lift up, exalt) for each life within. Hell/kel - "to conceal/cover" implies ones choice to ignore heaving self up.
If you want to analyze words, go read the Dictionary and analyze every single word in them. Then post them in 1 single place. Don't use everyone's comments and threads for your analysis and breakdowns.
Rebuting others' points and defending your own is a MUCH better mental excersise than any word analysis.
Wanting to be saved by suggested tempts one to ignore that? Whaaaat?
No, "hell" is taken by some to mean "the grave", while popular belief is that it is the lake of fire.
--
By the way, what do YOU believe? Should people believe in Jesus and love Him, or is athiesm the true belief?
Need implicates (if/then)...reasoning (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore that.
To implies towards aka inception towards death analyzing life... words are synthesized together to distract from that.
"Go read" implies dictating others what to do...free will of choice needs to resist what others want to dictate.
Energy aka the place to be aka "all for one and one for all". Only within energy can there be placement.
Com (together) ment (mind)...nature sets each ones mind apart from one another; few within tempt the minds of many together into a "hivemind", which naturally inspires to be broken apart.
Inception sentences life towards POINT of death...there's no other point for life. What one rebuts when making a point is ones life back into the process of dying.
Much vs little or better vs worse...always a conflict against others; never ones resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
One cannot choose want without ignoring need. Nature supplies all needed; wanting from one another implies ignoring nature.
Growth (life) can only exist within loss (inception towards death) aka one can only live within the process of dying, hence the phrase "having one foot in the grave".
Ask yourself this...if a woman gets raped while experiencing "hell", then why can a woman giving birth can experience "heaven" at the same moment?
Also...ignoring perceivable for suggested implies the making of "graven" images aka idols/ideals. Notice also that you wrote that hell is TAKEN, just like ones consent takes suggested into possession.
Aka the lake (inception towards death) of fire (life), hence kindling (inception) and extinguishing (death) each formed flame (life) during flow.
What do the elderly complain most of? "It's too cold"...hence the heart/hearth/hertha - "burning place" burning out... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hearth
To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, while ignoring that ones perception is "by the way" of all perceivable.
Believe inverts "being alive"...if consented to.
a) Should vs shouldn't love vs hate are conflicts of reason among believers. Free will of choice needs to resist the wanted temptation of holding onto any side, otherwise it binds itself to another.
b) Jesus aka je suis (I AM) implies taking possession over self, while ignoring to be temporary potential (life) within ongoing procession (inception towards death).
Jesus tempts one to ignore CHRIST (to anoint) aka the separation of each being from one another, when coming through the birth-channel.
Ones belief in jesus (i am) establishes every other one as a YOU (phonetic jew). That's what spell-craft can conceal behind such simple words, and those holding onto beliefs cannot see it, hence not analyzes it aka not break apart what their belief holds together.
a) To believe implies ones consent to any suggested -ism, which only then shapes one into an -ist aka a follower.
b) Using THE implies ones consent to suggested the-ism, which makes one a-the-ist. Such a simple spell, and yet the majority cannot fathom it.
c) True vs false (reasoning about suggested) tempts one to ignore change aka the implication (if/then) of perceivable.
Nature cannot generate FALSE, nor does nature require anyone within to declare what's TRUE to one another. It's ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), which turns into a conflict of reason (true vs false).
If one adapts to change by implication (if/then), while resisting to choose a side within reason (true vs false), then one doesn't participate within a conflict against others, and can think straight instead of circular logic.
Perceivable inspiration moves straight through each ones perception, while suggested information tempts one to keep turning it within ones mind. That's a trick...a feedback loop.
Read the scriptures and decide for yourself... its what you always do when you don't get the answer you like.
decide for yourself based on evidence and reasoning. the truth rises up, error gets cut down.
Aka bound by logic within a conflict of reason (are vs aren't). This bond implies religion/religio - "to bind anew".
Protestant/protestor - "to affirm it"...hence not rebellious; but submissive, just like any other religion (bondage).
The only rebel...israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".
Oh bullshit... the Protestant Revolution tore Chrisendom apart. Read a basic history book.
Protestant vs Orthodox; Catholic; Baptist; Evangelical; Lutheran etc. Both sides are consenting to versus/verto - "to turn" aka turning against one another...NOT apart from one another.
Only each jew revolts by overturning gentiles inwardly (circular logic) and outwardly (conflicts of reason). To revolt implies "cast off allegiance, break away from established authority" hence remaining apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806 ...while surviving the mutual destruction of gentiles coming together within endless conflicts of reason.
Christen implies "to anoint", hence the separation of all into each one aka the coming into being of each anointed one through the birth-channel.
Ok Rabbi, go jump in an oven.