Group of zero, a box with nothing in it. No matter what number you multiply that empty box by, the sum of the contents of that heap of empty boxes will be zero.
If one implies only; then addition; subtraction; division and multiplication can only one happen within one.
How does 1×1=1
Being implies differential within equal aka partial within whole aka one within oneness aka form within flow aka living within process of dying.
Other ones suggest the equalization (=) of differentials (+ - x /) by tempting one to ignore self for counting others.
Living implies differential; dying implies equal...trying to make differences equal destroys life.
Example: 1x1=1 represents an equation both you and me can mentally consent to, while ignoring that either one of us exists physically in a different position from one another.
If physical differentials are mentally equating, then that's a contradiction, hence tempting different ones against (contra) one another.
Certainly doesn't fit the standard definition of multiplying
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot ascertain; fit; standardize or define anything without mentally contradicting physical.
Whole adds (inception) and subtracts (death) partials (life); which implies that each partial is a division within whole able to multiply by intercourse with one another.
Sorry I forgot about you. Here is the question rephrased.
In mathematics, multiplication is an operation that combines two numbers, called factors, to produce a result, called the product. Essentially, it's a shortcut for repeated addition. For example, 3 multiplied by 4 (3 x 4) is the same as adding 3 to itself four times (3 + 3 + 3 + 3). Why is 1x1=1???
One isn't IN mathematics until one consents to enter mathēmatike tekhnē (artificial learning) from a suggesting teacher.
multiplication is an operation that combines two numbers...
...which permits a chosen one (the teacher a student chooses) to utilize dualism to operate on ones perception from outside the confines of artificial learning. The student meanwhile believes in the combination of two, while ignoring to remain one within all.
The TION in operation implies action, which doesn't combine, but divides into reactions. A cause cannot combine with anything, only divide into effects...it's the effects which can combine with one another, while ignoring cause.
called factors
Factor; noun - "In commerce, an agent employed by merchants, residing in other places, to buy and sell, and to negotiate bills of exchange, or to transact other business on their account."... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/factor
A factor implies a jew utilizing artificial learning (mathēmatike tekhnē) as agent to trick gentiles into a commercial contract between buying (consent) and selling (suggest).
Nature doesn't produce substitute agents, but as the primary action it brings (duces) forward (pro) reactions, hence externally generating internal reactors.
A gentile cannot fathom this while being held accountable by a jewish agent. Mathematics trick gentiles to count each other, hence making themselves accountable to a chosen ones suggested numerology aka arithmos (number) + logy (logic) aka gematria (geometric) aka talmudic gemara/gamar (to finish/complete)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemara
By seeking equations...different gentiles are finishing each other off by utilizing jewish agents like mathematic.
to produce a result, called the product
a) Result/resilire - "to rebound" aka ones response being bound, while falling back. Nature produces free will of choice; a jew suggests results to bind free will of choice among gentiles into a commercial contract between buying (consenting) and selling (suggesting).
Nature produces productive beings...suggested results tempt beings to become unproductive.
b) What does energy produce? What's the product of energy?
Essentially, it's a shortcut
a) Essence implies being. Cutting short being implies dying.
b) IT implies a genderless third party...how could essence be genderless?
As for first (he) and second (she) party...notice S(plit)HE, hence not first (1) and second (2), but one within one another. Also FE(minine)MALE and WO(mb)MAN.
What if math is being used to tempt 1 to view second as 2, instead of second/seco - "to divide"?
a shortcut for repeated addition
What if repeated addition implies the inception of each being, hence the resurrection of each anointed one (christ)? What if the use of contraception against inception and abortion against birth implies a "shortcut" for repeated addition?
Why is it that a bunch of numbers can distract you from the essence of being and those who're trying to destroy it?
3 multiplied by 4 (3 x 4) is the same as...
a) If it's the same, then why compare it to different equations? Why does equality (sameness) require the drawing together of comparisons? Without those artificially drawn comparisons...would equality be perceived as differentiation?
b) 3x4 and 4x3...why equalize differences? Why can an essential being perceive those differences...just to equalize them for one another?
c) What if you miss ONEself in your mathematics? What if suggesting numbers tempts the one consenting to first ignore the ONE suggesting, and then ONEself in the process?
How would math work without ONE suggesting and another ONE consenting?
d) How does 3 (tricycle) x 4 (car) equals 12?
Why is...
Because one suggested what IS to distract another one from what WAS perceivable.
If inception sentences life towards point of death, then expression claiming a point (exclamation point) corrupts ones sentence/sentience. One cannot claim a moving sentence without corruption.
See; I don't care what information others are suggesting...drawing from perceivable inspiration allows ones free will of choice to operate carefree, hence without the burden others are trying to impose.
Suddenly, the flat earth posts are making sense
It's one group of one, so it's just one thing.
Let's say you have a box with a number of apples in it. In this particular box, you have one apple.
So, one box, of one apple, is just one apple total.
To use 3x4, say the box has 3 apples, and you have four of those boxes. 4 boxes, each with 3 apples in it, is 12 apples total.
Of is a way better definition than the one given. Thanks. Way more practical and fitting.
Happy to help!
Now do zero. Where does the apple go if not eaten?
You have one box, it has zero apples in it.
You have a thousand boxes, each has zero apples in it.
No matter how many boxes you have, you have zero apples.
Group of zero, a box with nothing in it. No matter what number you multiply that empty box by, the sum of the contents of that heap of empty boxes will be zero.
Stop the presses.
If one implies only; then addition; subtraction; division and multiplication can only one happen within one.
Being implies differential within equal aka partial within whole aka one within oneness aka form within flow aka living within process of dying.
Other ones suggest the equalization (=) of differentials (+ - x /) by tempting one to ignore self for counting others.
Living implies differential; dying implies equal...trying to make differences equal destroys life.
Example: 1x1=1 represents an equation both you and me can mentally consent to, while ignoring that either one of us exists physically in a different position from one another.
If physical differentials are mentally equating, then that's a contradiction, hence tempting different ones against (contra) one another.
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot ascertain; fit; standardize or define anything without mentally contradicting physical.
Whole adds (inception) and subtracts (death) partials (life); which implies that each partial is a division within whole able to multiply by intercourse with one another.
Sorry I forgot about you. Here is the question rephrased.
In mathematics, multiplication is an operation that combines two numbers, called factors, to produce a result, called the product. Essentially, it's a shortcut for repeated addition. For example, 3 multiplied by 4 (3 x 4) is the same as adding 3 to itself four times (3 + 3 + 3 + 3). Why is 1x1=1???
One isn't IN mathematics until one consents to enter mathēmatike tekhnē (artificial learning) from a suggesting teacher.
...which permits a chosen one (the teacher a student chooses) to utilize dualism to operate on ones perception from outside the confines of artificial learning. The student meanwhile believes in the combination of two, while ignoring to remain one within all.
The TION in operation implies action, which doesn't combine, but divides into reactions. A cause cannot combine with anything, only divide into effects...it's the effects which can combine with one another, while ignoring cause.
A factor implies a jew utilizing artificial learning (mathēmatike tekhnē) as agent to trick gentiles into a commercial contract between buying (consent) and selling (suggest).
Nature doesn't produce substitute agents, but as the primary action it brings (duces) forward (pro) reactions, hence externally generating internal reactors.
A gentile cannot fathom this while being held accountable by a jewish agent. Mathematics trick gentiles to count each other, hence making themselves accountable to a chosen ones suggested numerology aka arithmos (number) + logy (logic) aka gematria (geometric) aka talmudic gemara/gamar (to finish/complete)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemara
By seeking equations...different gentiles are finishing each other off by utilizing jewish agents like mathematic.
a) Result/resilire - "to rebound" aka ones response being bound, while falling back. Nature produces free will of choice; a jew suggests results to bind free will of choice among gentiles into a commercial contract between buying (consenting) and selling (suggesting).
Nature produces productive beings...suggested results tempt beings to become unproductive.
b) What does energy produce? What's the product of energy?
a) Essence implies being. Cutting short being implies dying.
b) IT implies a genderless third party...how could essence be genderless?
As for first (he) and second (she) party...notice S(plit)HE, hence not first (1) and second (2), but one within one another. Also FE(minine)MALE and WO(mb)MAN.
What if math is being used to tempt 1 to view second as 2, instead of second/seco - "to divide"?
What if repeated addition implies the inception of each being, hence the resurrection of each anointed one (christ)? What if the use of contraception against inception and abortion against birth implies a "shortcut" for repeated addition?
Why is it that a bunch of numbers can distract you from the essence of being and those who're trying to destroy it?
a) If it's the same, then why compare it to different equations? Why does equality (sameness) require the drawing together of comparisons? Without those artificially drawn comparisons...would equality be perceived as differentiation?
b) 3x4 and 4x3...why equalize differences? Why can an essential being perceive those differences...just to equalize them for one another?
c) What if you miss ONEself in your mathematics? What if suggesting numbers tempts the one consenting to first ignore the ONE suggesting, and then ONEself in the process?
How would math work without ONE suggesting and another ONE consenting?
d) How does 3 (tricycle) x 4 (car) equals 12?
Because one suggested what IS to distract another one from what WAS perceivable.
! + ! + _!3
If inception sentences life towards point of death, then expression claiming a point (exclamation point) corrupts ones sentence/sentience. One cannot claim a moving sentence without corruption.
See; I don't care what information others are suggesting...drawing from perceivable inspiration allows ones free will of choice to operate carefree, hence without the burden others are trying to impose.
Grimbles
Tl;dr