I just realized something :
78 rpm --> 7+8 = 15 ---,> 1+5 = 6
45 rpm ----> 4+5 = 9 or "6" upside-down
33 rpm ---> 3+3 = 6
The faster the speed, the better the sound, but the actual speeds are arbitrary.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
stupid
Obviously
There are technical reasons for the speeds such as convenient gearing to 50/60hz synchronous motors and 33RPM matching the speed of film projector
Yep. Some of our technology is from military leftovers. Not necessarily in this case, but--
I wouldn't be surprised if like, an ammunition feeder motor on a Mk45 5"/54 pushes powder using a 78rpm motor, and after the war we had a surplus of very specific parts to sell to the populace.
This is possible I guess, but why the three different speeds through the decades though?
And the invention of recording onto wax cylinders was the first of all, and honestly that's one invention I see no military origin in. It seems like those wax cylinders were still innocent.
I only meant to provide account that innovation is oftentimes downstream of surplus.
Whether that applies to this case, you're a better judge than I would be.
Eh...maybe so, maybe not.
I’d say they’re evil for treatment of the artists, the napster bullshit, the death clauses in contracts and keeping most of the money to themselves, not over numbers that have to be manipulated to try and show cause. They do actual evil things, I don’t need addition done to vinyl to see that.
Clearly
Just pointing out this "anamoly."
I completely agree, no need to get squirrelly.
Motion implies actual; measuring speed from within implies arbitrary.
Matter (life) within motion (inception towards death) implies arbitration aka depending on the will of each arbitrary beings free will of choice.
Speed implies rapidity of movement aka the rapid measuring of ones mind (ment) within motion; hence rapid/rapere/rep - "to seize".
Measuring implies to exercise moderation aka ones free will of choice curbing itself with boundaries.
Light does not have a speed...it's each ray within the visible spectrum of light, which can measure each others temporary speed during ongoing light.
Speed represents a trick tempting ones mind/memory to hold onto arbitrary measurements, while comparing them with other arbitrary measurements.
Nature doesn't need to be measured...all is one in energy. Each one within implies a T-ONE one within tonus (sound) aka an inflection aka a bending of temporal growth (life) during ongoing loss (inception towards death). Few trick many to measure as to be able to artificially modulate natural inflection.
Sleigh of hand...the movie "Speed". Going over fifty (inception) arms the bomb (life); going under fifty (death)...BOOM.
Why fifty? 50/50 aka half of whole aka each one partial (matter) within whole (motion) aka differentials split even aka even sound differentiating tunes aka Looney Tunes...looney/lunatic - "insane" aka in sanus (within sound).
Notice the licence plate of the car used by Jack to enter the bus...TUNEMAN aka the tuning of man... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwcl-mzf3rg
So this is all supposed to be an answer to the quote about speeds being arbitrary?
Man, for real, though...
What the fuck are you doing this for?
How about this...both questions and answers are arbitrary to the necessity of natures solution (inception towards death) to each problem (life).
What if few trick many to ignore perceivable solution for suggested questions and answers from one another?
How would you break this cycle without answering or questioning what others are doing? As in...how does one describe natures solution to others without using arbitration?
An arbitrary phrase inverting nature...ones response (re) to being forwarded (for) within all (al).
Using "for real" arbitrarily by questioning or answering it, establishes a conflict of reason (yes vs no) aka yes I am real vs no I am fake. That is an artificial conflict...corrupting ones response (re) forwarded (for) within all (al) of nature.
I can explain this from different perspectives, yet I cannot choose for others to change their own perspective back from artificial (suggestion) to natural (perception).
a) Not for (forwards) aka towards suggested outcome, but in response to perceivable origin. Ones choice needs to respond to natures balance, yet wants to respond to each others choices.
Choice within balance implies being FREE (life) within DOM-inance (inception towards death). The suggested choices by others tempt ones choice into "liberty" to others, while ignoring free-dom.
One cannot get free will of choice from the choice of another without binding self to another, hence contradicting "free". Both questions and answers tempt one to do exactly that...binding free will of choice.
b) Fuck originates from FUGGE aka the fugger family... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family which were originally named "fucker".
That's one aspect of the ongoing revisionism of his-story, another is that a FUGGE/FUGE represents a "masonic joint" aka a mason of free (will of choice) utilizing suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar to "join" both together into a wall of ignorance, which represents the wall within many that the few are bewailing.
There's the jewish angle, just like how numerology ties to gematria aka gemara (the second part of the talmud) aka jewish geomancy underneath gentile geometry...