Let me be blunt: Polly goes on way too long without stating the point she's trying to prove. To be even more blunt, disinformation agents very characteristically give you long soap opera narratives instead of trying to transmit information as clearly and concisely as possible.
That being said, a vital question is: exactly why do "the important stories never go viral"? She doesn't answer that in the first 6:14, which is when I turned it off.
Nor do I have the exact answer... yet. The art and science of it seems to be subtle. The overt act of telling you a lie is quite primitive by comparison, as is silencing and censoring those who tell the truth. Shadowbanning and other such techniques are somewhat more sophisticated.
There seems to be something underlying that, which I have noticed due to a phenomenon I have seen over and over: The evidence for numerous startling conclusions is frequently lying in plain sight, yet no one seems to notice. Further, bringing it to people's attention should be like setting a match to a cotton ball, but it is in fact more like setting a match to waterlogged newspaper.
I spent at least my first couple of years of research into the new world of conspiracy theory saying to myself, "Wait--what?! Hang on, is that really true?!" then launching into further research. This very much does not appear to be the way that the vast majority of "conspiracy theorists" operate, let alone normies.
In sum, it seems that all "They" need to do to keep "the important stories from going viral" is to simply keep them out of the mouths of authorities, both mainstream and alternative, because almost everyone needs to be beaten over the heads with the truth. Very few appear to be capable of getting it on their own.
The differentiation from every into each thing aka from cause into effect implies operation/operari - "to have effect, be active, cause".
If effect ignores cause for other effects, then that implies artificial idleness during natural operation, which is commonly called a psychological operation.
the important stories
Nature doesn't import stories...it influences (inception towards death) form (life) through perceivable inspiration. Those within utilize suggestion and consent to import information into memory, which is where they "store" it.
Another word for storing is "deposit", which implies each ones divided (de) position (posit)....not ones pledge into a contract with another for safekeeping as suggested.
viral
Viral/virus - "poisonous substance" aka each ones poise (vir) within all (al)...not anything by others.
Few can suggest anything on a screen, yet only if many consent to look at it, does it go viral aka spread like a virus. It's ones consent to a suggestion, which distracts from ones poise within al, while positioning one in a subordinated stance under the poisonous influence by another.
Aka your mind on tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka trying to establish the sum of all things as the inversion of nature dividing all into each one.
It's a jewish suggestion which summons consenting gentiles into a sum aka into the unwashed masses aka the amounting of many under few aka collectivization.
Wish AI
That implies wanting artifice, while ignoring the need of natural.
Let me be blunt: Polly goes on way too long without stating the point she's trying to prove. To be even more blunt, disinformation agents very characteristically give you long soap opera narratives instead of trying to transmit information as clearly and concisely as possible.
That being said, a vital question is: exactly why do "the important stories never go viral"? She doesn't answer that in the first 6:14, which is when I turned it off.
Nor do I have the exact answer... yet. The art and science of it seems to be subtle. The overt act of telling you a lie is quite primitive by comparison, as is silencing and censoring those who tell the truth. Shadowbanning and other such techniques are somewhat more sophisticated.
There seems to be something underlying that, which I have noticed due to a phenomenon I have seen over and over: The evidence for numerous startling conclusions is frequently lying in plain sight, yet no one seems to notice. Further, bringing it to people's attention should be like setting a match to a cotton ball, but it is in fact more like setting a match to waterlogged newspaper.
I spent at least my first couple of years of research into the new world of conspiracy theory saying to myself, "Wait--what?! Hang on, is that really true?!" then launching into further research. This very much does not appear to be the way that the vast majority of "conspiracy theorists" operate, let alone normies.
In sum, it seems that all "They" need to do to keep "the important stories from going viral" is to simply keep them out of the mouths of authorities, both mainstream and alternative, because almost everyone needs to be beaten over the heads with the truth. Very few appear to be capable of getting it on their own.
I wonder if this was Polly's answer? I doubt it.
The differentiation from every into each thing aka from cause into effect implies operation/operari - "to have effect, be active, cause".
If effect ignores cause for other effects, then that implies artificial idleness during natural operation, which is commonly called a psychological operation.
Nature doesn't import stories...it influences (inception towards death) form (life) through perceivable inspiration. Those within utilize suggestion and consent to import information into memory, which is where they "store" it.
Another word for storing is "deposit", which implies each ones divided (de) position (posit)....not ones pledge into a contract with another for safekeeping as suggested.
Viral/virus - "poisonous substance" aka each ones poise (vir) within all (al)...not anything by others.
Few can suggest anything on a screen, yet only if many consent to look at it, does it go viral aka spread like a virus. It's ones consent to a suggestion, which distracts from ones poise within al, while positioning one in a subordinated stance under the poisonous influence by another.
Wish AI could watch this for me and summarize in 500 words
Exercise your attention span a little She's worth it.
It's not a matter of my attention span
Aka your mind on tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka trying to establish the sum of all things as the inversion of nature dividing all into each one.
It's a jewish suggestion which summons consenting gentiles into a sum aka into the unwashed masses aka the amounting of many under few aka collectivization.
That implies wanting artifice, while ignoring the need of natural.