SpaceWeatherNews (S0) guy is saying power outages were related to the pole shift. I couldn't get past 15 minutes so does anyone else want to watch the whole thing and tell me if he presents some convincing evidence?
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Core Points
Event Overview: A significant power outage affected Portugal, Spain, and France, attributed to an unusual atmospheric phenomenon rather than typical culprits like hacking or bad weather. Key Cause: The outage was caused by the penetration of solar wind through a weak point in Earth’s magnetic field, resulting in high-energy atmospheric disturbances. Official Response: The Spanish electricity grid authority, REN, claimed that the outage was due to extreme temperature variations causing oscillations in high-voltage lines, which led to synchronization failures across the interconnected European grid. Scientific Observations: The speaker tracked solar activity influencing the atmosphere, noting a surge in total electron content over the North Atlantic, focusing on the Rock of Gibraltar as a critical area for the disturbances. Global Impact: The event highlights the increasing significance of Earth’s magnetic field changes, which may lead to more frequent or severe disruptions globally.
Key Conclusions
Misrepresentation of Events: The official narrative about the blackout being caused by extreme weather conditions is misleading; the real cause was electromagnetic disruptions linked to solar activity. Concerns about Earth’s Magnetic Field: The weakening magnetic field of Earth increases susceptibility to such disruptions, raising questions about future stability and the potential for similar occurrences. Need for Awareness: The speaker emphasizes the importance of public awareness and preparedness regarding potential solar and magnetic events. Progressing Timeline of Catastrophes: Recent events indicate that earth’s disaster cycle may be accelerating, possibly leading to unprecedented occurrences within the next few years.
Important Details
Observational Data: The disturbances were noted through real-time tracking of atmospheric data, specifically focusing on variations in the F layer of the atmosphere and surges in total electron content. Historical Context: The speaker discusses how similar disruptions are becoming more common, citing recent incidents like a blackout in Puerto Rico correlating with minor solar activity. Personal Perspective: A sense of urgency is conveyed regarding global changes and their impacts on society, hinting at a future that may require significant adaptation. Irregularities in Science: Mention is made of recent scientific findings regarding volcanic activity on celestial bodies, shifts in planetary atmospheres, and how these may relate to the larger narrative of solar and cosmic influences on Earth. Call to Action: Viewers are encouraged to stay informed, prepare personally and collectively, and seek out reliable information channels to navigate potential future crises effectively.
Sounds like AI summation. Is ChatGPT even able to process that much context at once? I think a video that long would be far more tokens than it can actually handle.
But anyway, from what I gathered from the video and the alleged summary, there was no solar activity, but he still believed it was related to Earth's weakening magnetic field.
My issue is with his overconfident, long winded style, he is not getting to the point. For me that makes the video unwatchable. There is an apparent contradiction of him basically saying "This is exactly what I've told people about" but also "no solar activity" and "I can't really point to clear data". All he ever talks about is the impact of solar activity when the magnetic field weakens, but now he claims victory for this?
This guy just annoys me so I don't think I can finish the video. The guy is too full of himself.
It's AI obviously. It's NoteGPT which is precisely for summarizing videos. It can provide whatever summary you want.
Thanks for the tip and the help. I still have my doubts if that service is truly processing the entire transcript...how can we know for sure? It's a bit of a black box what is really going on.
I guess just watch the video and compare to the summary. Seems pretty accurate to me.
Except when I watched the first third of the video I'm quite sure he said there wasn't any kind of specific solar activity to point to that day. So the summary completely missed that nuance and failed to fully make the case which clears that up. What exactly did he allege the sun did that day and by what mechanism?
Anyway, I'm not watching it since the guy annoys me. Wants to be right and likes to sound smart, but doesn't want to make things clear for his audience.
I still need to look at this angle of things. My wonder is if it's shifty stuff why would the outage
remain(effect)injust 2.5 countries.u/Graphenium
If you can stand the guy, then please let me know your findings. I cannot watch him ramble and not getting to the point.
Overall it sounded like he was saying "this totally confirms what I've been saying", yet also admits "no solar activity" was happening at the time, which is basically all he ever talks about. And then he says he doesn't have clear data of what exactly the event was it sounds like, but I wasn't willing to listen to him another 35 minutes to see if he ever clears that up.
He asked you to summarize a 50 minute video and this is what you produce? Why tf are you tagging me
Btw it’s affect not effect, maybe you should ask ChatGPT to proofread your spelling
No I meant effect and I was just sharing a wonder. Why do you seem angry? I tagged you because I thought you wanted to know my thought, oops, my bad..
No, you definitely meant affect lmao
Because that’s twice now you’ve responded to me, unprovoked, with condescending faggotry because I mention ai
No, I wanted you to understand why I was opposed to this faggots post in the first place, because of what he was asking from us. Which you 100% failed to produce. Maybe you didn’t read OP’s post. HE WANTED YOU TO WATCH A 50 MINUTE VIDEO AND WRITE HIM A SUMMARY.
I don't see why I shouldn't comment, 'unprovoked', because I think AI is bad and I care for you to not get pulled in to some nonsense.
I'm pretty sure I asked OP a while back if they aren't able to watch something maybe those that do could help, I don't see the problem there either.
You don’t see a problem with someone saying “it’s not worth my time to watch this video, but im going to post it anyway, and one of you losers with less valuable time than me can write me a summary”? Well you must be unemployed.
If you think ai is bad for people to use, go make a post about that and present your argument. Commenting “Lay off the ai sauce” in response to someone saying “we aren’t your slave, use the tools at your ready disposal and do something yourself” is condescending faggotry though
I think you misunderstood OP but I'll be more careful to not be rudely condescending.
No, I didn’t misunderstand shit from his statement. He thinks his time is more valuable than the board’s time.
There is no evidence for pile shift or that this is a globe with two poles. You have a north pole and a south pole perimeter. Like a disc magnet
Ask ChatGPT you fucking faggot
lol
, lmao even
You 6 month old account, zero post sockpuppet faggot
lol
Maybe you should lay off the AI sauce?
I notice you haven’t provided him with a summary? (Once you’ve prepared one, blow it out your ass)
I haven't prepared a theory, I'm still looking at multiple angles, just wanted to chime in on your AI comment.
Totally unnecessary because you mistakenly believe I’m using ai - I’m just opposed to this faggot treating us like slaves, which should be obvious
You were using AI last time we talked, my mistake.
Apology accepted.
Nothing worse than asking an incel to do work, I forgot. It really set off your PMS.
Walk into traffic you fucking waste of space
lol