Irrelevant. The Constitution explicitly says the president has this power, and every president up to Nixon used it. Judges don’t magically grant or withhold powers. They have no power to do so. We’re not discussing what judges do or don’t do. We’re discussing what Trump does or doesn’t do.
And Trump has chosen not to do what he is legally allowed to do simply because a judge illegally said so.
When has a court ever prevented anything a determined legislature and executive has ever pushed forward?
Any time said executive or legislature does something jews don’t want. Like when that Californian judge said voters don’t get to vote on whether illegals can be here and decided that their vote was null and void, allowing illegals to be here.
Read Federalist 78
WOW A PIECE OF PAPER! THAT’S SURELY GOING TO STOP A JEW!
Look up "the switch in time that saved nine" on the prototypical case of a court that got in the way of an executive branch with a mandate.
As for Federalist 78, and saying you don't care what it says, that's just you, as usual, dismissing data that you can't incorporate into your limited model.
I'm wasting my time with your ignorance here. If that is your goal to forum slide me, bravo.
Look up "the switch in time that saved nine" on the prototypical case of a court that got in the way of an executive branch with a mandate.
You’re telling me what I talked about in… I guess it was another thread. The court did what they were told by their owners, lest they be destroyed. Just like the president does what he’s told by his owners, lest he be destroyed. Just like Congress does what it’s told by its owners, lest it be destroyed. This isn’t relevant to the discussion.
As for Federalist 78, and saying you don't care what it says
Reported for spam. No one said this but you.
dismissing data that you can't incorporate into your limited model.
Irrelevant. The Constitution explicitly says the president has this power, and every president up to Nixon used it. Judges don’t magically grant or withhold powers. They have no power to do so. We’re not discussing what judges do or don’t do. We’re discussing what Trump does or doesn’t do.
And Trump has chosen not to do what he is legally allowed to do simply because a judge illegally said so.
Eat shit.
Ask yourself a question.
When has a court ever prevented anything a determined legislature and executive has ever pushed forward?
I'll wait on an answer.
Read Federalist 78 and get back to me.
Any time said executive or legislature does something jews don’t want. Like when that Californian judge said voters don’t get to vote on whether illegals can be here and decided that their vote was null and void, allowing illegals to be here.
WOW A PIECE OF PAPER! THAT’S SURELY GOING TO STOP A JEW!
Look up "the switch in time that saved nine" on the prototypical case of a court that got in the way of an executive branch with a mandate.
As for Federalist 78, and saying you don't care what it says, that's just you, as usual, dismissing data that you can't incorporate into your limited model.
I'm wasting my time with your ignorance here. If that is your goal to forum slide me, bravo.
I give you the last word here.
You’re telling me what I talked about in… I guess it was another thread. The court did what they were told by their owners, lest they be destroyed. Just like the president does what he’s told by his owners, lest he be destroyed. Just like Congress does what it’s told by its owners, lest it be destroyed. This isn’t relevant to the discussion.
Reported for spam. No one said this but you.
You mean what you did when
DONALD TRUMP PUBLICLY ADMITTED THAT YOU ARE LYING AND THAT HE IS PURPOSELY ALLOWING COURTS TO TELL HIM WHAT HE CAN AND CANNOT DO, IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION?
What about it? What about you projecting your own failures onto me?
No, please, continue humiliating yourself. It’s not like you’ll stop until your paychecks bounce.
Dipshit paid shill doesn’t even know how the website works, lol.
Thanks for admitting that
DONALD TRUMP PUBLICLY ADMITTED THAT YOU ARE LYING AND THAT HE IS PURPOSELY ALLOWING COURTS TO TELL HIM WHAT HE CAN AND CANNOT DO, IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.