Look up "the switch in time that saved nine" on the prototypical case of a court that got in the way of an executive branch with a mandate.
You’re telling me what I talked about in… I guess it was another thread. The court did what they were told by their owners, lest they be destroyed. Just like the president does what he’s told by his owners, lest he be destroyed. Just like Congress does what it’s told by its owners, lest it be destroyed. This isn’t relevant to the discussion.
As for Federalist 78, and saying you don't care what it says
Reported for spam. No one said this but you.
dismissing data that you can't incorporate into your limited model.
You’re telling me what I talked about in… I guess it was another thread. The court did what they were told by their owners, lest they be destroyed. Just like the president does what he’s told by his owners, lest he be destroyed. Just like Congress does what it’s told by its owners, lest it be destroyed. This isn’t relevant to the discussion.
Reported for spam. No one said this but you.
You mean what you did when
DONALD TRUMP PUBLICLY ADMITTED THAT YOU ARE LYING AND THAT HE IS PURPOSELY ALLOWING COURTS TO TELL HIM WHAT HE CAN AND CANNOT DO, IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION?
What about it? What about you projecting your own failures onto me?
No, please, continue humiliating yourself. It’s not like you’ll stop until your paychecks bounce.
Dipshit paid shill doesn’t even know how the website works, lol.
Thanks for admitting that
DONALD TRUMP PUBLICLY ADMITTED THAT YOU ARE LYING AND THAT HE IS PURPOSELY ALLOWING COURTS TO TELL HIM WHAT HE CAN AND CANNOT DO, IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.