"Why do Catholics and Protestants have different books in their Bibles?"
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Protestants follow the Tanakh whereas Catholics don’t. So when they split from Christianity and lied about Sola Scriptura they chose to be guided by Judaism hence why Zionism is so prevalent in Protestantism.
The Vatican is evil (future) brother. Come out of her. Blood is on your hands there.
Not sure what your point is when the Vatican signed the 1999 Declaration on Justification with Protestants. The Vatican II itself was created by six Protestant ministers.
Catholics have already left the Vatican II.
The plot of "Christian unity" is a Catholic one, not a Protestant movement. It's for the subversion of the Reformation (a long standing goal of the Vatican) for the continuation of the Roman Catholic Empire.
You have to be smoking some good stuff to come up with that. The Catholic Church is just letting Protestants waltz in and write their doctrines? Come on.
It’s not a hidden fact
https://i.ibb.co/YFWDb7c9/IMG-9696.jpg
A. Raymond George (Methodist)
Ronald Jaspar (Anglican)
Massey Shepherd (Episcopalian)
Friedrich Künneth (Lutheran)
Eugene Brand (Lutheran)
Max Thurian (Calvinist-community of Taize).
Wow those guys must have been some powerful Protestants to do that XD. Sorry but there is no possible mechanism of control these men could be exerting over the Papacy.
If somehow that picture is to be believed, it seems like the real thing to question is that they were actually Protestant at all. Look more like Jesuits with the way they are dressed.
TurnToGod is unable to deal with two issues simultaneously on a psychological level if the trueness of one challenges his belief in the trueness of another.
If you knew the history of freemason subversion and the history of Vatican II, you'd not write what you just wrote.
The Orthodox got things correct on this one.
Because Protestants are heretics and they removed books from the Bible that had things like prayer for the dead in Maccabees that ware contrary to their heretical theology.
Everything else is pointless words on this issue.
Completely wrong. The Reformation had nothing to do with establishing Canon. That was done long ago by the earliest Christians and before that by ancient Hebrews.
The problem is letting a false Christ ("Vicar of Christ") add doctrines to support a Babylonian agenda.
Wormtongue.
Why did the "reformers" drop 7 books that had been part of the Bible since the Council of Nicaea in year 325?
Because they had aspects of all 7 conflicted with their heretical theology. Even Luthor just put them in the back of his Bible, even though he ADDED words to his German translation.
I get why people dislike, even hate, the Catholic Church, but lying about objective history is pathetic, even for you.
You need to repent of your lies.
The Council of Nicaea didn't determine canon, it was to discuss a specific theological problem. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YgbbHzzOvk8
The Catholic Church added books to their canon AFTER the reformation began. They were long considered important writings containing some history but NOT INSPIRED. Rome deciding later on that they are inspired doesn't make them so.
If the ancient Hebrews didn't treat the Apocrypha as scripture, and most early Christians said they weren't,why would you then take 16th century Rome's word for it? That's silly. https://pastorunlikely.com/did-martin-luther-remove-books-from-the-bible-a-pastors-answer/
True Christians who left Rome can rely on 2000 years of scholarship (and prior to that Hebrew scholarship) regarding what is Scripture. We don't need pedophiles in robes telling us they got it wrong.
Dude, you ignorant heretic. You link to you YouTube short as evidence of what the Council of Nicaea did?
LMFAO
The Council affirmed the Canon because it promulgated canon law and the Nicaean Creed, and you can't do one with out the other being already set.
How's this, I'll give you a tiny silver bell ringing...the Bible canon was reaffirmed at a Council in Rome in 385 AD, just 60 years later.
The books of the Bible were set, until heretics such as yourself wanted to remove GOD'S WORD for man's theology.
That's a short by a scholar who has an entire website on biblical history you can read through. Humble yourself and realize there are people who know more than you on the topic. You can read here if you actually want the truth https://www.wesleyhuff.com/blog/2020/10/13/what-happened-at-the-council-of-nicaea
Your traditions on this topic are myths invented in the middle ages.
I see you have no answer to the question. Gotcha.
Christ didn't found a Bible, he founded a Church.
What are you talking about, Papist? My entire comment was responding to your skeptical "question".
You clearly didn't read anything I wrote or cited. Useless bot.