"Why do Catholics and Protestants have different books in their Bibles?"
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
The Council of Nicaea didn't determine canon, it was to discuss a specific theological problem. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YgbbHzzOvk8
The Catholic Church added books to their canon AFTER the reformation began. They were long considered important writings containing some history but NOT INSPIRED. Rome deciding later on that they are inspired doesn't make them so.
If the ancient Hebrews didn't treat the Apocrypha as scripture, and most early Christians said they weren't,why would you then take 16th century Rome's word for it? That's silly. https://pastorunlikely.com/did-martin-luther-remove-books-from-the-bible-a-pastors-answer/
True Christians who left Rome can rely on 2000 years of scholarship (and prior to that Hebrew scholarship) regarding what is Scripture. We don't need pedophiles in robes telling us they got it wrong.
Dude, you ignorant heretic. You link to you YouTube short as evidence of what the Council of Nicaea did?
LMFAO
The Council affirmed the Canon because it promulgated canon law and the Nicaean Creed, and you can't do one with out the other being already set.
How's this, I'll give you a tiny silver bell ringing...the Bible canon was reaffirmed at a Council in Rome in 385 AD, just 60 years later.
The books of the Bible were set, until heretics such as yourself wanted to remove GOD'S WORD for man's theology.
That's a short by a scholar who has an entire website on biblical history you can read through. Humble yourself and realize there are people who know more than you on the topic. You can read here if you actually want the truth https://www.wesleyhuff.com/blog/2020/10/13/what-happened-at-the-council-of-nicaea
Your traditions on this topic are myths invented in the middle ages.
I see you have no answer to the question. Gotcha.
Christ didn't found a Bible, he founded a Church.
What are you talking about, Papist? My entire comment was responding to your skeptical "question".
You clearly didn't read anything I wrote or cited. Useless bot.