And you will never convince anyone who thoughtlessly made money on Bitcoin that it's bad
You will, once it is used in the manner you suggest. It won't be though. Meanwhile you're just dissing an alternative to fiat money and the central banking system and coping for not buying BTC by pretending you took the high ground. Come back when you have the receipts.
Explain SHA256 encryption to me before you want to talk about cope cryptard. You're the personification of the point you're replying to.
I was taking those stances and was quite clear on why I was taking them a decade ago. What I've come to learn is that the world is going to go in the directions it's steered regardless of what I do. I was too naive in thinking that enough people would understand and that if I refused participation enough other people would do. Now I know how to create LLMs and other AIs because I realized there is no fighting the tide
I was against BTC thinking it's a scam and then coping that it's not "real money" until last year when I finally took the L and bought in. Why would I have to explain how the encryption works (btw I have an idea because I was a web developer and handled streams that are encrypted that way)? I guess you're alluding that some entity behind the technology may have the key to decrypt the transaction hash? There are no 100% guarantees in cryptography and any system has vulnerabilities.
As I said, unless you have evidence BTC (not CBDC or some shitcoin that uses the blockchain technology) is used by tptb for nefarious purposes like tracking and tracing every transaction and destroying anonymity through digital id there's nothing more to talk about. Right now I can own, buy and sell BTC in full anonymity just like with cash.
It is absolutely relevant that the NSA released SHA256 and would not do so without being able to break it, but more than that, if you think so highly of the technology you should be able to explain how it works and why it succeeds in the ways you claim it succeeds. You don't buy and sell cash, you are buying and selling bitcoin because it's being used as a speculative asset and not a currency. Also you claim full anonymity but it's not fully anonymous, because everything is tied to a wallet and I'd be surprised if there's no way for a motivated person to trace your wallet to you (how are you paying for this Bitcoin, for instance?). I hope you do something good with the money you earn, but a technology that only works by permanently tracking and tracing everything, released with a very unlikely origin story that's been talked about all the time in media for over a decade is not likely to be a threat to the system.
Dude, I've been barking at BTC for 10 years, I know all the talking points and criticisms.
It is absolutely relevant that the NSA released SHA256 and would not do so without being able to break it, but more than that, if you think so highly of the technology you should be able to explain how it works and why it succeeds in the ways you claim it succeeds.
Guess where all the technology you're using, including the internet and modern cryptography comes from? Ultimately, you're always putting your trust in the system that creates and maintains the technology. It's inevitable unless you build and maintain it yourself.
You don't buy and sell cash, you are buying and selling bitcoin because it's being used as a speculative asset and not a currency.
Yes, BTC is mostly used as a store of value like gold. And just like gold, you can tether currency to facilitate transactions of said value.
Also you claim full anonymity but it's not fully anonymous, because everything is tied to a wallet and I'd be surprised if there's no way for a motivated person to trace your wallet to you (how are you paying for this Bitcoin, for instance?).
Depends on how serious you are on staying anonymous. There is a way to open a wallet that's not tied in any way to your ID. But even if I grant some hacker still can trace you that applies to any transaction you make, including cash.
It's either BTC which is a decentralized blockchain money with limited supply or Fed ran CBDC programable social credit monopoly money. That's the future and it shouldn't be a tough choice. If you have an alternative I'll hear it out.
You will, once it is used in the manner you suggest. It won't be though. Meanwhile you're just dissing an alternative to fiat money and the central banking system and coping for not buying BTC by pretending you took the high ground. Come back when you have the receipts.
Explain SHA256 encryption to me before you want to talk about cope cryptard. You're the personification of the point you're replying to.
I was taking those stances and was quite clear on why I was taking them a decade ago. What I've come to learn is that the world is going to go in the directions it's steered regardless of what I do. I was too naive in thinking that enough people would understand and that if I refused participation enough other people would do. Now I know how to create LLMs and other AIs because I realized there is no fighting the tide
I was against BTC thinking it's a scam and then coping that it's not "real money" until last year when I finally took the L and bought in. Why would I have to explain how the encryption works (btw I have an idea because I was a web developer and handled streams that are encrypted that way)? I guess you're alluding that some entity behind the technology may have the key to decrypt the transaction hash? There are no 100% guarantees in cryptography and any system has vulnerabilities.
As I said, unless you have evidence BTC (not CBDC or some shitcoin that uses the blockchain technology) is used by tptb for nefarious purposes like tracking and tracing every transaction and destroying anonymity through digital id there's nothing more to talk about. Right now I can own, buy and sell BTC in full anonymity just like with cash.
It is absolutely relevant that the NSA released SHA256 and would not do so without being able to break it, but more than that, if you think so highly of the technology you should be able to explain how it works and why it succeeds in the ways you claim it succeeds. You don't buy and sell cash, you are buying and selling bitcoin because it's being used as a speculative asset and not a currency. Also you claim full anonymity but it's not fully anonymous, because everything is tied to a wallet and I'd be surprised if there's no way for a motivated person to trace your wallet to you (how are you paying for this Bitcoin, for instance?). I hope you do something good with the money you earn, but a technology that only works by permanently tracking and tracing everything, released with a very unlikely origin story that's been talked about all the time in media for over a decade is not likely to be a threat to the system.
Dude, I've been barking at BTC for 10 years, I know all the talking points and criticisms.
Guess where all the technology you're using, including the internet and modern cryptography comes from? Ultimately, you're always putting your trust in the system that creates and maintains the technology. It's inevitable unless you build and maintain it yourself.
Yes, BTC is mostly used as a store of value like gold. And just like gold, you can tether currency to facilitate transactions of said value.
Depends on how serious you are on staying anonymous. There is a way to open a wallet that's not tied in any way to your ID. But even if I grant some hacker still can trace you that applies to any transaction you make, including cash.
It's either BTC which is a decentralized blockchain money with limited supply or Fed ran CBDC programable social credit monopoly money. That's the future and it shouldn't be a tough choice. If you have an alternative I'll hear it out.