Cryptofaggots
(media.scored.co)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Well put. NSA came up with a plan 10 years prior to the inception of Bitcoin. This had to happen to get people to merge with this new system. Good luck to those that threw their fiat into this. It'll be interesting how you'll access this crypto once the law monitors the access points to get to your invisible coins.
People believe it's decentralized and that in itself is funny. Not only do these people believe in a system that was launched, they trust that it will be there long term after the world reset or when the lights come back on. Good luck. All of it including fiat is worthless. These zionists thought of everything to trap us.
What's more annoying, gold bugs or crypto bros?
Hard to decide.
Mammon is mammon
Real and hetero.
Once I started seeing the worship of money, I see it everywhere, even in "right wing" spaces and people, even self professed Christians. Absolutely bonkers how upside down the world has become.
They own the gold price and silver price and oil price too. Same shit, they control how much it's worth.
They will use (or blame) quantum to destroy crypto as a part of the inevitable reset. Theoretically they could also try to rehypothecate the fiat to crypto which would have the same effect but require existing their direct manipulation.
Coming (inception towards death) into being (life) implies a setting apart....suggested common-ism like commodities tempt together, hence tempting ONE to hoard ALL value, while ignoring that all value moves through each one.
The issue isn't which commodity to hold, but holding onto a current, while it moves.
Happy/hap - "chance" implies ones free will of choice gambling on the chance of owning what a chosen one suggested.
Holding onto a suggestion makes one happy, hence transforming choice into chance. The issue with that....being choice within balance implies odd within even, so transforming choice into chance puts all odds against one.
a) Being implies ex (life) within change (inception towards death), hence expressing growth during loss. Exchanging any commodities implies sharing growth during loss, while ignoring to grow by resisting loss.
b) Ex implies matter; change implies motion...ex"changing" matter, while ignoring motion destroys matter mutually as traders/traitors to self.
c) Choosing to buy or sell ignores being FREE will of choice.
Sleight of hand: The Price is Right aka right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right#etymonline_v_15068 Only within that can one be free.
3 years old. If he had bought Bitcoin at the time pf posting this, he would have doubled the investment.
a) Can energy be doubled without dividing self?
b) Can ones life be doubled without dividing self by intercourse with another into an off-spring?
c) Investment implies mind vested/clothed/cloaked within a suggested morgage aka mort gaige - "death pledge"...
d) What if consenting to a suggested investment implies "crossing" ones choice out for the chance of double the investment aka a "double cross"?
Are you a bot?
a) How does seeking affirmation from another free ones mind?
b) What bot could formulate questions made by free will of choice?
A. No
B. Many of them
You just post in a weird format is all.
a) How could "no; not; nothing" be an answer if it's based on de-nial aka nihilo (nothing)?
b) How could artificially made choices be free? Doesn't nature set those within free to choose?
a) Flow (inception towards death) shapes form (life)... few suggest formats to gain control over shape and size of consenting many.
To format implies to arrange/arengen/hringaz/sker - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arrange#etymonline_v_17021 That's how few turn many against each other, while bending each ones will.
b) Weird/wierd/wyrd - "fate, chance, fortune; destiny" from root wer - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/weird#etymonline_v_4898
Nature generates choice...few within tempt many with artificial chance to ignore that, while gambling.
tl; dr...Nature differentiates, so that's what I do. Many are tricked by few to behave alike, hence taking offense by anyone behaving differently.
My crypto investments are doing amazing.
The stock market is a scam. Completely over-valued, and propped up with invisible central bank buying.
First off, congrats, because you made money and that's all that matters.
But has crypto seen widespread adoption to support its massive rise in price?
If not, then it's just a speculative bubble.
I think Crypto will serve some purpose, primarily in the black market and from people who use it based on principle (a fraction of a small minority) but, after 20 years or so, it shows no signs of ever living up to its goal of replacing central bank notes or even being used as a payment method for ecommerce transactions.
21 million bitcoins.
You missed BTCs most fundamental values: you can't cheat. You can't print more. you can't stop it.
your fiat currency: why the fuck would you defend the ponzi inflation scheme that is the fed?
But has it lived up to its goals?
Has Bitcoin replaced fiat currency?
Does it look like Bitcoin is going to replace fiat currency in the future?
Is it even a popular choice in payment processing?
Surpassed its goals i would say.. (Exchange capabilities are going to require a hard fork, btc needs to be able to process far more transactions per second. Foundation is already working on this).
Has it replaced fiat currency: 1 country so far.
Bitcoin or another stable monetary coin wlll ALMOST CERTAINLY replace printable fiat in the future. In fact, as long as bitcoin grows it IS replacing fiat.
electronic payments use cash. switching that to bitcoin is trivial.
There's no reason not to have both btw. But as you watch your fiat become devalued year after year while demand for widely used, secure, multinational cryptocurrency grows (because of it's inability to be printed on demand), you'll find cash only sticking around for tangible exchanges.
And when any printed fiats eventually fail and crash, as they inevitably do, BTC is your hedge. BTC will gobble up some currencies, and others will piggy back on BTC to survive.
We print money without backing. How long do/did you expect that to last? In every respect, BTC is better than USD.
El Salvador? USD is still the official currency (look it up if you don't believe me).
a) Bitcoin growth has not kept pace with its replacement of fiat currency. If it's price is indicative of its replacement, it's going to have to reach well over 100mil to replace fiat
b) Bitcoin's value is measured in Fiat Currency; without Fiat, no one knows the value of Bitcoin.
It's been a great store of value, that much is true. But who knows how long before it has to actually start delivering on its promises and it becomes evident that it's purely a speculative bubble, like the Dot Com boom, where people were just betting on tech companies being the next big thing without those companies having ever done anything.
At the end of the day, people only invest in Bitcoin because it goes up, not because they actually believe it's the future.
Enjoy your inability to recognize a financial instrument which is more secure, more robust, immune to inflation and immune to counterfeiting as being better than your hyperingflation prone, backed by nothing, printed without reporting, paper money.
Money is merely a construct of transmittable value.
Again, BTC is superior in this in every regard against cash.
USD will crash before BTC.
Stop spamming the same idiotic post. This anon is either a shill or he's seething because he failed to get on the bandwagon and has to wageslave for some faceless corporation to get by. I was shitting on BTC until recently, but there is a point where one has to do a reality check, admit they were the idiot and humble themselves. I don't care for other crypto and I do think they are potentially a scam. BTC is in another category.