TL;DR: This puzzling echo back in time is, well, not something you can summarize. You just have to read it, for entertainment purposes if nothing else. But with some very high-octane speculation we may be able to make some sense of it all, and even gain a tiny bit of insight into how the world really works.
Let me hook you into this by describing two families. One is that of Richard Cusack who married Joan and had children John, Anne, and Susannah. The other is that of Richard Cusack who married Ann and had children Joan, John, Ann, and Susie. One is a family of actors including an A-lister, the other is the family of a witch executed at Salem well over three centuries ago. If you don’t consider that really bizarre, you may as well punch out now. Otherwise, read on….
I don’t know if the fact that the Salem Witch Trials were fake (17-page PDF) and was filled with other actors makes the whole thing less bizarre or more, but there we have it. Now, I did do some rounding for dramatic effect. There is another child, Bill, in the second family, but you can verify the rest in the page of the famous actor’s father, Richard John Cusack. The first family had a number of additional children I left out, but you can verify the rest in the genealogy pages of the witch and her father:
Susannah (North) Martin, Salem Witch Trials (1621-1692) Geni
Susannah (Susanna) Martin formerly North (1621-1692) Wikitree
Richard North, of Salisbury (1595-1667) Geni
Richard North (1590 - 1667) Wikitree
Except you can’t. Well, not anymore anyway. Richard’s last name, as you can plainly see, is North and not Cusack. Or is it that simple? This where this all takes a very unexpected turn and we’ll have to back up to see how I got here.
I sat down this morning to quickly check into whether NICAP (National Investigations Committee On Aerial Phenomena) was connected to the witch trials of 1692. A peculiar question but it seems normal to me now. Anyway, please don’t ask exactly what I searched on because I surely don’t recall at this point, but in the snippet of one of the results, I saw that someone named “Richard Cusack North” had some connection to the Salem Witch Trials. “Oh, no,” I thought, “not John, too!” Fearing the worst, I searched for that person.
And searched and searched and searched. You can’t find anyone by that exact name. Now, get on this quick because the evidence of these search snippets is transient by nature. Here is what you’ll find when you search on “richard cusack north” using:
Google search: Susannah (North) Martin, Salem Witch Trials – Geni with snippet “Richard Cusack North, Joan North (born Bartram)…”
Bing search: Richard North - Historical records and family trees – MyHeritage with snippet “Richard Cusack NORTH was born circa 1590, in birth place, to William NORTH and Agnes Pratt.”
and also Susannah North - Historical records and family trees – MyHeritage with snippet “Susannah NORTH was born in birth place, to Richard Cusack NORTH and Joan BARTRAM….”
Yandex search: Susann North - Historical records and family trees – MyHeritage with snippet “SUSANN Martin (born North) was born on month day 1621, in birth place, to Richard Cusack North and Joan North (born Bartram).”
The results are consistent across engines, websites, and verbiage. No mere “glitch”. Since the time these pages were crawled, the genealogical record has been scrubbed clean, to the state you see it now, and for a reason we have yet to determine.
These are definitely the same people and our Salem Witch Trials connection is still intact, but some information has been vaporized: that Richard’s middle name was Cusack, and that his parents were William North and Agnes Pratt. Click around the current genealogies as much as you like and you will not be able to connect to anyone named Cusack. Further, it looks like any record for both William North and Agnes Pratt have been vanished.
There’s also something messed up about who Richard was married to and who the mothers of his children were. For example, Geni says he married Mary Scott and they had a daughter named Ursula, then Richard later married a woman named Ursula. That does not seem likely at all, does it? Perhaps this happened when “They” were (ehem) updating the records.
If we trace John’s Cusack line, we only get a few generations back to Manhattan in 1852. Now, Cusack is not a common name in America, but why would we think John Cusack was connected to this Richard Cusack North that bumrushed his way across America’s open borders four centuries ago into Salisbury, Massachusetts? Well, it’s no smoking gun, but John’s mother, Ann Paula (Carolan) Cusack was from Newton, Massachusetts, about 40 miles from Salisbury, passing Salem along the way. Small world, huh?
Here it is: I do not think Richard Cusack North was just one of the tired, the poor, the huddled masses. I think his was one of the “bloodlines”. There was already an oddity there: Why would an ordinary 17th Century English blacksmith (as we are told) have an Irish surname as his middle name? Well, as the Elites do it, the middle name is reserved for the maternal line. Since Pratt was his mother’s name, this would have been his paternal grandmother’s name. Not that any of this can be confirmed any more. But I mean, it was only days ago we talked about Pratts overthrowing the LDS.
Also, Richard’s Geni page tells us that he came over in the very same ship, the Susan and Ellen (spellings vary widely), that had five years previously carried over Thomas Parker and John Proctor, two Family names that figure bigly in the SWTs.
So WTH is going on here? Is it all mere happenstance? But how does happenstance include the recent scrubbing of genealogies? Was it all just written into The Simulation? What, for one person out of 8 billion to find and ten persons out of 8 billion to read? Do we live in Wonderland, where everything can and will have happened for no reason whatsoever? Personally, I reject all these. Let’s get serious!
WARNING: EXTREME AND UNFOUNDED SPECULATION AHEAD
Maybe there’s a way we can make it all make sense, but we have to start at the other end and flow forward from there. These Spook Families, generational Satanists apparently, have worked together and intermarried for many centuries. Eventually, they invaded the future America together (although actually, you find out they were behind the colonization in the first place).
So the Cusacks are one of these Families. I’ve never seen the name come up, so perhaps they’re on the periphery. But with this crew you are either In or you are Out and the Cusacks are In. But if so, shouldn’t there be more evidence of that? Not if you think it through. If you imagine even a couple of dozen families over, say, four centuries, there must be thousands of bloodline members extant. Yet of all the evidence I’ve collected, I could only name a few dozen that have appeared on the American stage. That’s all that was ever needed, you see?
This also explains the eerie repetition of names. We just saw the same thing earlier today (as I write this) with Linda Moulton Howe’s granddaughter having the same name as her ancestors three centuries in the past. These bloodlines are evidently of paramount importance to Them, extending even to their first names. I mean, not to give any of Them any ideas, but if They just picked names out of whatever the equivalent of a phonebook is today, none of this work would be possible. But shit, They know no one’s looking.
So John is in, but as you should understand that doesn’t mean he’s “active”, as only a tiny fraction are. If you read the “Political views” section of his wiki, that’s about as good as it gets for someone trying to recover from liberalism. It is mindbreaking for ordinary people to admit that they have been on the wrong side for a long time, you know? They have to always have been right, except.
In any case, it seems to me he spoke too loudly and his career was torched by “hidden forces”. Then suddenly he gets back in:
Cusack starred in his first TV series Utopia in 2020. In a 2020 interview with The Guardian, Cusack had admitted to the decline of his acting career. "In the last few years, I haven’t been able to get projects financed. That could be a function of getting older. Or it could be a function of being cold."
This is all very interesting, particularly that series, Utopia. Right in the heat of the “real” pandemic, the storyline is that global conspirators cook up a fake virus to get people to take a fake vaccine which will secretly sterilize then for three generations. The explicit plan is to get the herd down to 500 million (Guidestone number, of course, another of Their projects). I mean, whoa, pretty on the nose, right? Controversy! Which finally brings us to the speculation: what if a proposal was made to John?
“They”: Listen, John, we know that you object to some of the ideas we have. But we feel certain that we’re good people and doing the right thing. You’re one of us and we think you can come to understand it as clearly as we do. The series we told you about has a character that will notify the population of our plans, as we always do. That character will convince the audience that this is the right thing, a good thing, and he believes that completely. At the very same time, you, John, will convince us that you understand that this is the right thing, a good thing, and you believe it completely. Then all will be mended.
John: Okay, I’ll do it, but I want out. Myself and my whole family, back to the beginning. I want us stricken from the record, written out of history, no trace that we were ever involved with any of you and your activities. This is the end. You can do that, right?
Utopia: The Plan (YouTube 6/24/2021 3:22) (<- haha, the time!)
Bonus: I could not help but notice that Richard (no middle name) North’s newly updated mother is Anna (Hodell) North. Name ring a bell? The Black Dahlia murderer was George Hodel. I wrote up quite a bit on it here:
I plucked the Black Dahlia and found a coverup that began with a generational Satanist and continues to this day. We’ll discuss that coverup why it’s so important. (conspiracies.win 10/4/2024)
Get this #1: Look at the actual URL for Anna’s link. See how it ‘s “Hodell-1”? In their page naming scheme, that means it’s the first record they created with that name. I think they made this phony person as the most inside of inside jokes. Fake Anna’s fake father (“Hodell-2”) was born in Essex, of course, and they used “Hodel” as a subtle blackwash. Or maybe in honor. Who knows with these freaks.
Get this #2: That whole Black Dahlia story got so deep, so crazy, I never even posted parts 2 and 3.
Thanks for reading!
That a movie.
You do realize that movies are not reality?
Did you know that Hugh Jackman is, in fact, not the Canadian superhero Wolverine but an Australian actor? I hope this didn´t blow your mind.
hahahahahahahahah i do relaize that no ones give a fuck what a dumfuk shill has to say lolololololololol too obvious!!!!!!!!
noice!!!!
Are you 12?
Compare:
he
you:
Dude, this forum is not for you
We call Hugh Jackman Wolverine when he plays that role.