Science proves the Great Flood. The Bible wins again.
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Pretty neat.
The Younger Dryas theory can explain all of this, and it has nothing to do with God.
The flood in the bible was bastardized to include "The entire world" - but we all know telephoning stories will change reality. Add to the fact that people 4,000 years ago had no idea how big the world was, so to them, a flood was "world-wide". It is clearly, in my mind, that The Younger Dryas, which had massive, world-wide effect, is one of the most well-known examples of abrupt change that could have easily be the source of these stories passed on from generation to generation, which is why it is found is almost all religions.
There's another alternative history and community that discuss things like this. They refer to that great flood as the mud flood. There's evidence that suggest a few previous civilizations existed earlier than experts claim to be and they were much more advanced than us. Look up the YouTube channels my lunch break and jon Levi for more.
The bible is true on that, the same historical record of a great flood is recorded in many myths around the world.
Might it be they all tell the same story...
Or it could be explained by natural phenomenons that people wrote into a Bible. The Bible is just a collection of stories. The Younger Dryas is one of the most well-known examples of abrupt change. About 14,500 years ago, Earth's climate began to shift from a cold glacial world to a warmer interglacial state. Partway through this transition, temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere suddenly returned to near-glacial conditions.
That's what I meant. It's just ancient (forbidden) history, the Bible giving its own interpretation but very similar to some others iirc.
Yeah, but hes wrong. The world is old. When Adam was created by God, it was the 4th time it was done. But thats something they omitted from the Bible.
Also dinosaurs did not exist. Giants did, those were nasty and cruel, so God flooded the world to get rid of it all.
So he is mostly on point, but lost on alot of other things.
I don't know where you are getting your information from but it isn't the Bible.
He's referring to the book of Enoch most likely.