No, he phrased it as a question to slide the convo and put him on the defensive so he could feel superior. Its a slimy baby town frolic tactic that he should be ashamed of
ok you know what, after giving it some thought, maybe its more somewhere around 6 billion, and they are inflating the numbers for the "unsustainable" narrative.
i can live with that. the video does an atrocious job of presenting the argument tho
maybe i will give it some even further thought some day
Considering I have no idea the official methodology for determining a country's population, I have no way to really analyze this.
You have your bible?
Doesn't matter, no one will think. They surrendered their reasoning to the screen long long ago
nothing wrong with questioning shit but if "300 most populous cities only accounts for 20% of population" is the crux of the argument that's retarded.
"we're expected to believe the remaining 80% is to be found in all the towns and villages?"
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... yes?
but for anyone who hasn't travelled much i can understand how it can get confusing
Are you saying you believe even in the possibility of over population???
That isn't what he said at all don't be a fuckin retard.
That's why he phrased it as a Question.
No, he phrased it as a question to slide the convo and put him on the defensive so he could feel superior. Its a slimy baby town frolic tactic that he should be ashamed of
It's his thread.
Thats the dumbest excuse I've ever heard for underhanded tactics. Are you an alt? Why are you defending him?
"This user has no posts."
I think you might not be thinking this through.
ok you know what, after giving it some thought, maybe its more somewhere around 6 billion, and they are inflating the numbers for the "unsustainable" narrative.
i can live with that. the video does an atrocious job of presenting the argument tho
maybe i will give it some even further thought some day
That's how I took that too! Lol