a) The division (dis) of onward motion (course) cannot be destroyed...the divided (life) within onward motion (inception towards death) can be tempted against each other within conflicts of reason for mutual destruction.
b) What if me taking words apart that others hold together...makes confusion clearer to see?
c) What if I didn't consent to suggested objectivism by simply adapting as subject to perceivable origin?
Can one live without trying to reach objects? Can one subject self to whatever comes along? Does objectivism contradict adaptation?
It is clear that destroying discourse is your main objective.
a) The division (dis) of onward motion (course) cannot be destroyed...the divided (life) within onward motion (inception towards death) can be tempted against each other within conflicts of reason for mutual destruction.
b) What if me taking words apart that others hold together...makes confusion clearer to see?
c) What if I didn't consent to suggested objectivism by simply adapting as subject to perceivable origin?
Can one live without trying to reach objects? Can one subject self to whatever comes along? Does objectivism contradict adaptation?
Good luck with that.
Luck implies getting in return...that turns one against others, while tempting one to ignore what one already got.
Consider "running out of luck"...if luck gets one something along the line, then how could one run out of the line?
You done yet?