I glanced over it. For me, it seemed to be an exploration of word origins to find historical connections. Some of which are tenuous at best. But to some point, that is the point. To make connections that are not obvious. Kind of like what u/free-will-of-choice pretends to be doing. But not so fake and gay.
Some of this is correct, mainly the part about the Romans and Switzerland.
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-kJr3jbLXDPwf6LHB
So the book is just a reference to other things? I flipped through some pages and didn’t find anything groundbreaking.
I glanced over it. For me, it seemed to be an exploration of word origins to find historical connections. Some of which are tenuous at best. But to some point, that is the point. To make connections that are not obvious. Kind of like what u/free-will-of-choice pretends to be doing. But not so fake and gay.
Singular origin...sound.
Each ones consent to his-story establishes a connection.
That's in the eye of the beholder aka the being choosing to hold onto the aforementioned connection.
Why would FREE make CONNECTIONS? That contradicts itself...
Try glancing over Ior Bock 'The Bock Saga" for way more word origins...
I love this anon.