I was just expecting hard evidence, since I am reviewing the information on jabs very seriously. If female sterilization was indeed the goal of the jabs, then my theory is wrong.
I am just trying to make sense of all this...
They have 5G towers already in most places. Usually, the reproductive organs are the first to be affected by EM radiation, since they have no protection against EM waves. Same for the fetus. They don't need additional sterilization based on that.
The effects of the jab were, or are, mainly related to the blood vessels. Women have an open circulatory system, which leads to very heavy menstruation at irregular cycles. Men have a closed circulatory system, which leads to tearing and cloths. Additionally, the heart has its own nervous system. Many athletes fell due to heart problems - most commonly miocarditis, pericarditis which is just fancy words to use for an inflamation of the heart (mio- peri- is just the location of the inflamation). However, this clearly shows that the first victim of the jab is the circulatory system. But is that the intent, or a side-effect?
Whatever was in the jabs has been enough to block blood vessels - that's not usually happening with any vaccine. We can theorize that only those with 7 boosters, or however they had, had received such injuries... but these injuries happened most commonly after the first booster.
So, what if only two shots can bring you to this state. The amount is still not enough, so there might only be two explanations - either the substance is self-replicating, or is it programmable.
I've never heard of both things. So far, I haven't heard anything to be self-replicating but nature. But I found strange information:
"In this review, we update the most recent progress in graphene based sensors for mimicking human senses such as artificial retina for image sensors, artificial eardrums, gas sensors, chemical sensors, and tactile sensors." - https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssensors.2c02790
If you're not aware of graphene, or the more programmable form - graphene oxide, it is apparently nanotechnology known from 2004, that is 1-atom thick. They no longer have to insert a chip, the chip can assemble itself with EM radiation. That makes the Neuralink a joke.
I don't know... you're probably aware of all this. But in 2020, they used the full power of the media to push for this jab, and several years more. People largly mistrust the media now because of that fake act.
Bottom line, I think they are planning something huge with the jabs, not just sterilization. They don't even need the jabs for that, 5G can do it in about 3 years. But 5G can also activate the graphene oxide in every human in a populated place or a road.
Apparently, optogenetics is how to control the genes with light. Not any light, but blue light. UV light is electromagnetic. Graphene Quantum Dots (these are like spheres made from 1-atom thick graphene particles 60 or 72 most commonly) glow blue under UV light... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Y9K2z-ji4Q
Much of what you wrote doesn't sound plausible. I've run a lot of wild scenarios in my head. I think the whole thing was a money grab like none other by the superclass.
Well, you can still watch the documentary before you formulate your opinion.
Otherwise, you are just throwing random ideas that are not even connected to nanotechnological neuroscience, or as you call it - "strange things".
But thank you for your opinion. It's a nice reminder that whoever is aware of the topic - agrees, whoever is not - wouldn't lift a finger to educate themselves (even when the information is directly sent to them).
Sorry, I might be a bit frustrated because I wasted my time to provide all the sources that are never looked at... I don't know... I keep hoping for someone to research the topic... However, no energy is ever lost, so to anyone reading this, and reviewing the sources - contact me at any time, if you want more sources, or something seems unclear from the documentary. I have plenty of sources, just tell me the topic. (There is a big chance that I've already made a post on the topic, just check my profile)
Makes sense.
I was just expecting hard evidence, since I am reviewing the information on jabs very seriously. If female sterilization was indeed the goal of the jabs, then my theory is wrong.
I am just trying to make sense of all this...
They have 5G towers already in most places. Usually, the reproductive organs are the first to be affected by EM radiation, since they have no protection against EM waves. Same for the fetus. They don't need additional sterilization based on that.
The effects of the jab were, or are, mainly related to the blood vessels. Women have an open circulatory system, which leads to very heavy menstruation at irregular cycles. Men have a closed circulatory system, which leads to tearing and cloths. Additionally, the heart has its own nervous system. Many athletes fell due to heart problems - most commonly miocarditis, pericarditis which is just fancy words to use for an inflamation of the heart (mio- peri- is just the location of the inflamation). However, this clearly shows that the first victim of the jab is the circulatory system. But is that the intent, or a side-effect?
Whatever was in the jabs has been enough to block blood vessels - that's not usually happening with any vaccine. We can theorize that only those with 7 boosters, or however they had, had received such injuries... but these injuries happened most commonly after the first booster.
So, what if only two shots can bring you to this state. The amount is still not enough, so there might only be two explanations - either the substance is self-replicating, or is it programmable.
I've never heard of both things. So far, I haven't heard anything to be self-replicating but nature. But I found strange information:
"In this review, we update the most recent progress in graphene based sensors for mimicking human senses such as artificial retina for image sensors, artificial eardrums, gas sensors, chemical sensors, and tactile sensors." - https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssensors.2c02790
If you're not aware of graphene, or the more programmable form - graphene oxide, it is apparently nanotechnology known from 2004, that is 1-atom thick. They no longer have to insert a chip, the chip can assemble itself with EM radiation. That makes the Neuralink a joke.
I don't know... you're probably aware of all this. But in 2020, they used the full power of the media to push for this jab, and several years more. People largly mistrust the media now because of that fake act.
Bottom line, I think they are planning something huge with the jabs, not just sterilization. They don't even need the jabs for that, 5G can do it in about 3 years. But 5G can also activate the graphene oxide in every human in a populated place or a road.
Zombie appocalypse is an absurd theory, right? But they already do that with mice - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I64X7vHSHOE
Apparently, optogenetics is how to control the genes with light. Not any light, but blue light. UV light is electromagnetic. Graphene Quantum Dots (these are like spheres made from 1-atom thick graphene particles 60 or 72 most commonly) glow blue under UV light... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Y9K2z-ji4Q
Here's more information on the topic, if you are interested - https://odysee.com/Whats-next---the-full-covid-documentary:1
Much of what you wrote doesn't sound plausible. I've run a lot of wild scenarios in my head. I think the whole thing was a money grab like none other by the superclass.
I know how it sounds, that's why I provided the links, so you can see that's not only plausible, but they already do it effectively.
But if you have an argument against the theory, besides "it doesn't sound plausible", I'd be glad to explore the topic.
It's not even so hard to do:
Graphene
Optogenetics
Graphene quantum dots - fullerenes
Graphene nanotubes
Olfactory nerve
Amygdala
I think groups made claims like this so they could paint sceptics as believing strange things.
What they did was take children out of schools to make them less-skilled when they grow up.
Well, you can still watch the documentary before you formulate your opinion.
Otherwise, you are just throwing random ideas that are not even connected to nanotechnological neuroscience, or as you call it - "strange things".
But thank you for your opinion. It's a nice reminder that whoever is aware of the topic - agrees, whoever is not - wouldn't lift a finger to educate themselves (even when the information is directly sent to them).
Sorry, I might be a bit frustrated because I wasted my time to provide all the sources that are never looked at... I don't know... I keep hoping for someone to research the topic... However, no energy is ever lost, so to anyone reading this, and reviewing the sources - contact me at any time, if you want more sources, or something seems unclear from the documentary. I have plenty of sources, just tell me the topic. (There is a big chance that I've already made a post on the topic, just check my profile)