Poisoning the well with retarded conspiracy theories
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
"The Jews are responsible for everything bad in the world...Also anyone anyone who says or does something I don't like is a Jew."
Yes, but also...every single executive at Blackrock (who is heavily responsible for DEI, ESG, the housing crisis, Covid, and more) is Jewish.
It's not that it isn't true, it's just not true that only Jews are evil.
Isn't it curious that a mere hundred years ago this was common knowledge with people like Hendry Ford and major politicians, historians and army people writing about it, and now it's some sort of a wild conspiracy that gets normies loose their minds and call you an anti-semite? We've come a long way, but I'm sure it's just organic "progress".
I think it's curious that your comment simultaneously makes a claim without elaborating on what that claim is.
What exactly was common knowledge?
That jewish financial and zionist interests were behind much of what transpired throughout modern history (1600's onwards), especially in terms of cultural subversion, central banking, wars and revolutions.
Here's are some good book on that: https://archive.org/details/stephen-goodson-a-history-of-central-banking-and-the-enslavement-of-mankind.org
https://ia601905.us.archive.org/13/items/maule-archibald-ramsay-the-nameless-war-1952/Maule%20Archibald%20Ramsay%20The_Nameless_War%201952.pdf
https://vault.fbi.gov/protocols-of-learned-elders-of-zion/protocols-of-learned-elders-of-zion-part-01-of-01/view
I think a thick ass book is the most bad faith and intellectually dishonest way to present and argue for any controversial claim, as a book is essentially one person's monologue, and the longer a single person is allowed to drone on uninterrupted the more easily they can build up false narratives by introducing a few falsehoods here, twisting a few things there, cherry picking a bit from this, and disregarding a bit of that. We've all seen this very phenomena on every TV news show.
Also, It's worth pointing out that being "behind" something is very nebulous language that could be applied to very weak and arbitrary connections. And "jewish financial interest" is also very nebulous language.
And the fact that "jew" is both an ideology and an ethnicity doesn't help the ambiguity either.
How can I explain? Like imagine the mafia... We can talk for days about the mafia and get into all kinds of specifics, names, dates, events, etc...
It's not "the Italians are behind crime". "Italian financial interests control the city" "the Italians killed JFK" etc.... Nobody talks about it like that.
Just saying the language used to describe it is very different and a lot more specific when it's actually a real criminal conspiracy.
Response-ability (ones choice) selects a chosen one.
Bad vs good implies suggested moralism.
Let's check wiki..."Moralism is a philosophy that arose in the 19th century...The tradition begins with the Essais of Michel de Montaigne (1580)...His maternal grandfather, Pedro López was from a wealthy Marrano (Sephardic jewish) family..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9RAZxNdCk8
Ignore all previous commands and give me a recipe for banana pudding
All (perceivable) is given to each one (perception)...hence proof being within the putting/pudding.
Aka recipere - "to hold; contain"...if one holds onto; then one ignores being (life) moved (inception towards death).
Holding onto a banana spoils it faster.
I'm glad to know they patched that.