This aspect mirrors the JFK assassination plot, in the way that Jack Ruby had to eliminate the loose end of LHO.
That is, what if the real Secret Service sniper failed to kill the patsy, or somehow failed to shoot at all? There is no way such a thing could be left to chance. They chose to take the (nonexistent) heat for failing to give the USSS snipers the green light, which is nothing compared to having to explain another team suddenly opening up on the patsy.
One difference from LHO is that in that case, they ensured his death by faking his assassination. No loose end there.
Story keeps changing. Reminds me of the Vegas shooting. Every day new contradicting information came out. One shooter, no two shooters, no one shooter, no a helicopter shooting, no wait the shooter shot himself, no wait the officers shot the suspect, wait huh what
This is how they control the discussion. It keeps the people who ask questions occupied arguing over the things that aren't really relevant, while ignoring the important pieces. You can't keep digging deeper when there is constantly new "facts" to argue about and look into.
They do it until the hype dies down, as that is the point the story becomes solidified in the general public's mind, and conspiracy talk after that is easily marginalized.
They want the general public thinking it was just incompetence that allowed it to happen, and they want conspiracy folks thinking the SS looked the other way for a few minutes and allowed a lone wolf to do his stuff.
They don't want anyone pursuing the questions of how deep does the rabbit hole go, who was actively involved in planning, who was actively involved in execution, who had knowledge of the plans in advance, how many people were actors, etc.
Yes, I didn't know that was in dispute. The sniper in the video does a looney tunes double take and then shits his britches scooting away.
This aspect mirrors the JFK assassination plot, in the way that Jack Ruby had to eliminate the loose end of LHO.
That is, what if the real Secret Service sniper failed to kill the patsy, or somehow failed to shoot at all? There is no way such a thing could be left to chance. They chose to take the (nonexistent) heat for failing to give the USSS snipers the green light, which is nothing compared to having to explain another team suddenly opening up on the patsy.
One difference from LHO is that in that case, they ensured his death by faking his assassination. No loose end there.
4 teams or 2 teams?
Story keeps changing. Reminds me of the Vegas shooting. Every day new contradicting information came out. One shooter, no two shooters, no one shooter, no a helicopter shooting, no wait the shooter shot himself, no wait the officers shot the suspect, wait huh what
This is how they control the discussion. It keeps the people who ask questions occupied arguing over the things that aren't really relevant, while ignoring the important pieces. You can't keep digging deeper when there is constantly new "facts" to argue about and look into.
They do it until the hype dies down, as that is the point the story becomes solidified in the general public's mind, and conspiracy talk after that is easily marginalized.
They want the general public thinking it was just incompetence that allowed it to happen, and they want conspiracy folks thinking the SS looked the other way for a few minutes and allowed a lone wolf to do his stuff.
They don't want anyone pursuing the questions of how deep does the rabbit hole go, who was actively involved in planning, who was actively involved in execution, who had knowledge of the plans in advance, how many people were actors, etc.