a) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a conflict of reason within ones mind aka an argue-ment...clearly vs obscure; obvious vs oblivious, and simple vs complex.
b) Suggested writing tempts one to ignore perceivable delineation aka being (life) moved within a line (inception towards death). Why? Because to write implies to outline; while to be implies inline.
c) Question implies pursuing (quest) action (tion)...being implies reaction (life) resisting the temptation of action (inception towards death).
In other words...questions towards outcome tempts being to ignore origin.
d) The suggested rhetoric "beggars can't be choosers" tempts one to ignore that begging implies by ones free will of choice. So begging for question nonetheless implies shirking of ones response-ability (free will of choice) onto another.
e) Notice that appropriate implies taking into possession, which is what few are exploiting when many give consent to take suggested into possession.
In nature...a solid (life) cannot take possession of fluid (inception towards death); yet can be tricked to spend resistance on holding onto other solids, hence selling self out when consenting to the suggestions of another.
Obviously.
a) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes a conflict of reason within ones mind aka an argue-ment...clearly vs obscure; obvious vs oblivious, and simple vs complex.
b) Suggested writing tempts one to ignore perceivable delineation aka being (life) moved within a line (inception towards death). Why? Because to write implies to outline; while to be implies inline.
c) Question implies pursuing (quest) action (tion)...being implies reaction (life) resisting the temptation of action (inception towards death).
In other words...questions towards outcome tempts being to ignore origin.
d) The suggested rhetoric "beggars can't be choosers" tempts one to ignore that begging implies by ones free will of choice. So begging for question nonetheless implies shirking of ones response-ability (free will of choice) onto another.
e) Notice that appropriate implies taking into possession, which is what few are exploiting when many give consent to take suggested into possession.
In nature...a solid (life) cannot take possession of fluid (inception towards death); yet can be tricked to spend resistance on holding onto other solids, hence selling self out when consenting to the suggestions of another.
https://conspiracies.win/p/17teEUrhAa/x/c/4ZCbpKT29pw?d=50
Kek
Epstien obviously didn't kill himself.