He's a shill. There's no good explanation why someone would want him to fail that much, given the alternative is Biden or whoever Barrack, Pelosi and their overlords pick. I'm not a supporter but I'd rather have him if it makes any difference at all.
But the guy shilling for Operation Warp Speed Trump (yourself) isn't the shill?
Hmmm, might want to think about that one agent Smith.
I'm not a supporter but I'd rather have him
So you're a dishonest supporter at that. You're supporting both him and this false narrative created for him. Even calling people "shill" for daring to question the father of the clot shots.
I don't trust him precisely because of Warp speed and because he loves Israel. It's obvious he's part of the system, otherwise he wouldn't be selected in the first place, or become a real estate mogul for that matter.
That being said I ask you again: what's your alternative? You're either voting for one of the candidates who's less demonic or actively trying to dismantle the current system, which can only be achieved via massive changes in individual perception, which sadly is not gonna happen soon - the status quo has been entrenched for hundreds of years now.
The alternative would be decentralization. A movement focused on shoring up power locally, making use of state nullification or county nullification (even jury nullification) to resist federal tyranny.
But hoping the Jew worshiping federal tyrant loves me a bit more than the other is a waste of time.
You mean: let's fight the consequences of classical liberalism and masonic enlightenment ideas ("muh liberty above all", rampant individualism and view of the human being as homo economicus) with even more classical liberalism and enlightenment ideas? That won't fix things.
What people need is a common worldview that informs the way they approach government and society - above all, a worldview that allows for common objective morality not grounded in the individual or arbitrary made up "rights" that are not found in nature.
Only Christianity can provide that but the US is built upon the false presupposition that the state should be strictly secular and not influenced by the Church (as if the state doesn't need a moral framework which will inevitably be borrowed from some worldview, even if it's not a traditionally religious one).
If you define "more classical liberalism" to mean less centralized power then most certainly yes. I'm talking about pragmatic solutions to tyranny that work, while Trump believers have fallen into hero worship of a controlled opposition candidate that appears to only be there to pacify rebellion. He's on board with the NWO agendas at the end of the day. His wall wasn't built and the swamp wasn't drained.
Bullet to the ear (if we even believe that) or not.
What I was saying is your pragmatic solution can't mend what's broken on societal and individual level. Even if we manage to implement the system you propose, that wouldn't make society miraculously work any better or instill true devotion to God, proper morality, intolerance towards sin and evil and love of our neighbor instead of masonic revolutionary ethics of self-worship, relativism and degeneracy (which libertarianism supports by default as long as the arbitrary NAP is not violated).
Our problems are much deeper than the stupid bread and circus of politics and if we're victims of a tyrannical antihuman international satanic jewish cabal, it is because we let it happen in the first place through our sin, complacency, weakness and most of all - defiance of the true God. Everything happening is downstream to spiritual degeneration.
Decentralization is not atomization. It is self determination with properly sized groups of people where their views can be better expressed in legislation as needed.
It could be at the level of a state, or if the state is too tyrannical at the level of a county. It can be done peacefully as many states have already shown can be done over recent decades. They are able to defy federal orders without bloodshed.
Supposing the event was staged, their intent could be to bolster the public's expectation of a Trump victory and nothing more. They don't need to influence an election whose outcome is predetermined, and obviously not by drumming up support through the voter base.
Also, doesn't it seem redundant to stage an event to make Trump's election look legitimate when this was already the case?
They wouldn't want to make Trump's victory look inevitable unless they've decided to install Biden (or someone worse) as a humiliation/demoralization ritual. Their goal is to increase the shock value and internalize the American's role as a defeated people. Not that the particular jewish puppet matters.
That's assuming it was staged. And if it isn't, why is jew-owned Fox pushing the narrative of an inside assassination plot?
Inside job yes, staged no. Ever heard of Theodore Roosevelt? That guy was shot in the chest and kept speaking for over an hour while blood was soaking through his shirt. He knew it hadn't reached his lungs as he wasn't coughing up blood, so he finished his speech before going to the hospital.
The bullet was wedged in a chest muscle having been slowed by his folded sheets of paper his speech was written on and a glasses case. Too dangerous to surgically remove the bullet so it remained in him the rest of his life. If it was today, some people would be claiming he staged it and had a blood capsule under his shirt. (In the event it didn't help him get re-elected).
I also think of Audie Murphy during WW2 when it comes to defying bullets (obviously I'm not comparing Trump to Murphy, just trying to make a point for those who can't believe Trumps actions). Small little fella, very boyish face, typical nerdy type guy who became a minor movie star after the war. He was the most decorated soldier of WW2 and got the Medal of Honour, and personally killed at least 241 enemy soldiers.
Nobody would have thought that little man was a giant of courage inside. Some people see their mission more valuable than their own life and do whatever it takes to get it done and he was seemingly charmed. He once stood on a burning tank, shooting at the Germans and a whole platoon were firing back at him (think there were about 30 of them) and by some miracle barely scratched him. Crazy shit like that does happen, and as any Vet will tell you, you never know how you'll react to bullets coming at you till it happens.
I want to know who told the NY Times photographer to be there, because as many pro photographers have said you don't have shutter speed set that high in broad daylight unless you are expecting to capture something going very very fast, like an exploding headshot with spraying brain matter. Unlike the grainy Zapruder film, this would have played out in glorious 4k, 24/7 to completely humiliate and demoralise half the country. Instead he only got the bullet pic. How disappointing for them all, as it backfired quite spectacularly. In fact everything seems to be backfiring on them.
This ain't the 60's so they'll have a much harder time hiding what they did, especially as most of the Country know how corrupt they all are (unfortunately most are still blind to who's running the show but that may change). Hubris and overconfidence catches up with people in the end, and they ain't Gods even if they think they are.
Interestingly Ken O'Keefe of Europa fame who initially thought it was all 'staged' (and sorry that defies logic and it seems some conspiracists fall into the trap of seeing everything as fake, and ignore things which don't fit) but has now adjusted his perspective to believing it was a real hit after speaking to insiders he respects. He claims they told him 'they' decided to whack him because he said he would stop the war in Ukraine.
Don't hurt yourself with that stretch.
How many posts are you going to do on this same thing, anyway?
He's a shill. There's no good explanation why someone would want him to fail that much, given the alternative is Biden or whoever Barrack, Pelosi and their overlords pick. I'm not a supporter but I'd rather have him if it makes any difference at all.
But the guy shilling for Operation Warp Speed Trump (yourself) isn't the shill?
Hmmm, might want to think about that one agent Smith.
So you're a dishonest supporter at that. You're supporting both him and this false narrative created for him. Even calling people "shill" for daring to question the father of the clot shots.
I don't trust him precisely because of Warp speed and because he loves Israel. It's obvious he's part of the system, otherwise he wouldn't be selected in the first place, or become a real estate mogul for that matter.
That being said I ask you again: what's your alternative? You're either voting for one of the candidates who's less demonic or actively trying to dismantle the current system, which can only be achieved via massive changes in individual perception, which sadly is not gonna happen soon - the status quo has been entrenched for hundreds of years now.
The alternative would be decentralization. A movement focused on shoring up power locally, making use of state nullification or county nullification (even jury nullification) to resist federal tyranny.
But hoping the Jew worshiping federal tyrant loves me a bit more than the other is a waste of time.
You mean: let's fight the consequences of classical liberalism and masonic enlightenment ideas ("muh liberty above all", rampant individualism and view of the human being as homo economicus) with even more classical liberalism and enlightenment ideas? That won't fix things.
What people need is a common worldview that informs the way they approach government and society - above all, a worldview that allows for common objective morality not grounded in the individual or arbitrary made up "rights" that are not found in nature.
Only Christianity can provide that but the US is built upon the false presupposition that the state should be strictly secular and not influenced by the Church (as if the state doesn't need a moral framework which will inevitably be borrowed from some worldview, even if it's not a traditionally religious one).
If you define "more classical liberalism" to mean less centralized power then most certainly yes. I'm talking about pragmatic solutions to tyranny that work, while Trump believers have fallen into hero worship of a controlled opposition candidate that appears to only be there to pacify rebellion. He's on board with the NWO agendas at the end of the day. His wall wasn't built and the swamp wasn't drained.
Bullet to the ear (if we even believe that) or not.
What I was saying is your pragmatic solution can't mend what's broken on societal and individual level. Even if we manage to implement the system you propose, that wouldn't make society miraculously work any better or instill true devotion to God, proper morality, intolerance towards sin and evil and love of our neighbor instead of masonic revolutionary ethics of self-worship, relativism and degeneracy (which libertarianism supports by default as long as the arbitrary NAP is not violated).
Our problems are much deeper than the stupid bread and circus of politics and if we're victims of a tyrannical antihuman international satanic jewish cabal, it is because we let it happen in the first place through our sin, complacency, weakness and most of all - defiance of the true God. Everything happening is downstream to spiritual degeneration.
Decentralization is not atomization. It is self determination with properly sized groups of people where their views can be better expressed in legislation as needed.
It could be at the level of a state, or if the state is too tyrannical at the level of a county. It can be done peacefully as many states have already shown can be done over recent decades. They are able to defy federal orders without bloodshed.
Mises Institute has a lot of writings on the topic https://mises.org/mises-wire/when-nullification-works-and-when-it-doesnt
Do you see how the media liars and shills keep harping on the diversity thing to misdirect people into thinking what happened was due to incompetence?
DEI had nothing to do with them letting this happen on purpose.
Let's watch the video on this....yea, they stopped to pose, and say cheese
https://twitter.com/Brick_Suit/status/1813577250476028078
Yeah, exactly. Not really a "rush" off stage.
Supposing the event was staged, their intent could be to bolster the public's expectation of a Trump victory and nothing more. They don't need to influence an election whose outcome is predetermined, and obviously not by drumming up support through the voter base.
Also, doesn't it seem redundant to stage an event to make Trump's election look legitimate when this was already the case?
They wouldn't want to make Trump's victory look inevitable unless they've decided to install Biden (or someone worse) as a humiliation/demoralization ritual. Their goal is to increase the shock value and internalize the American's role as a defeated people. Not that the particular jewish puppet matters.
That's assuming it was staged. And if it isn't, why is jew-owned Fox pushing the narrative of an inside assassination plot?
Inside job yes, staged no. Ever heard of Theodore Roosevelt? That guy was shot in the chest and kept speaking for over an hour while blood was soaking through his shirt. He knew it hadn't reached his lungs as he wasn't coughing up blood, so he finished his speech before going to the hospital.
The bullet was wedged in a chest muscle having been slowed by his folded sheets of paper his speech was written on and a glasses case. Too dangerous to surgically remove the bullet so it remained in him the rest of his life. If it was today, some people would be claiming he staged it and had a blood capsule under his shirt. (In the event it didn't help him get re-elected).
I also think of Audie Murphy during WW2 when it comes to defying bullets (obviously I'm not comparing Trump to Murphy, just trying to make a point for those who can't believe Trumps actions). Small little fella, very boyish face, typical nerdy type guy who became a minor movie star after the war. He was the most decorated soldier of WW2 and got the Medal of Honour, and personally killed at least 241 enemy soldiers.
Nobody would have thought that little man was a giant of courage inside. Some people see their mission more valuable than their own life and do whatever it takes to get it done and he was seemingly charmed. He once stood on a burning tank, shooting at the Germans and a whole platoon were firing back at him (think there were about 30 of them) and by some miracle barely scratched him. Crazy shit like that does happen, and as any Vet will tell you, you never know how you'll react to bullets coming at you till it happens.
I want to know who told the NY Times photographer to be there, because as many pro photographers have said you don't have shutter speed set that high in broad daylight unless you are expecting to capture something going very very fast, like an exploding headshot with spraying brain matter. Unlike the grainy Zapruder film, this would have played out in glorious 4k, 24/7 to completely humiliate and demoralise half the country. Instead he only got the bullet pic. How disappointing for them all, as it backfired quite spectacularly. In fact everything seems to be backfiring on them.
This ain't the 60's so they'll have a much harder time hiding what they did, especially as most of the Country know how corrupt they all are (unfortunately most are still blind to who's running the show but that may change). Hubris and overconfidence catches up with people in the end, and they ain't Gods even if they think they are.
Interestingly Ken O'Keefe of Europa fame who initially thought it was all 'staged' (and sorry that defies logic and it seems some conspiracists fall into the trap of seeing everything as fake, and ignore things which don't fit) but has now adjusted his perspective to believing it was a real hit after speaking to insiders he respects. He claims they told him 'they' decided to whack him because he said he would stop the war in Ukraine.