But the guy shilling for Operation Warp Speed Trump (yourself) isn't the shill?
Hmmm, might want to think about that one agent Smith.
I'm not a supporter but I'd rather have him
So you're a dishonest supporter at that. You're supporting both him and this false narrative created for him. Even calling people "shill" for daring to question the father of the clot shots.
I don't trust him precisely because of Warp speed and because he loves Israel. It's obvious he's part of the system, otherwise he wouldn't be selected in the first place, or become a real estate mogul for that matter.
That being said I ask you again: what's your alternative? You're either voting for one of the candidates who's less demonic or actively trying to dismantle the current system, which can only be achieved via massive changes in individual perception, which sadly is not gonna happen soon - the status quo has been entrenched for hundreds of years now.
The alternative would be decentralization. A movement focused on shoring up power locally, making use of state nullification or county nullification (even jury nullification) to resist federal tyranny.
But hoping the Jew worshiping federal tyrant loves me a bit more than the other is a waste of time.
You mean: let's fight the consequences of classical liberalism and masonic enlightenment ideas ("muh liberty above all", rampant individualism and view of the human being as homo economicus) with even more classical liberalism and enlightenment ideas? That won't fix things.
What people need is a common worldview that informs the way they approach government and society - above all, a worldview that allows for common objective morality not grounded in the individual or arbitrary made up "rights" that are not found in nature.
Only Christianity can provide that but the US is built upon the false presupposition that the state should be strictly secular and not influenced by the Church (as if the state doesn't need a moral framework which will inevitably be borrowed from some worldview, even if it's not a traditionally religious one).
If you define "more classical liberalism" to mean less centralized power then most certainly yes. I'm talking about pragmatic solutions to tyranny that work, while Trump believers have fallen into hero worship of a controlled opposition candidate that appears to only be there to pacify rebellion. He's on board with the NWO agendas at the end of the day. His wall wasn't built and the swamp wasn't drained.
Bullet to the ear (if we even believe that) or not.
Decentralization is not atomization. It is self determination with properly sized groups of people where their views can be better expressed in legislation as needed.
It could be at the level of a state, or if the state is too tyrannical at the level of a county. It can be done peacefully as many states have already shown can be done over recent decades. They are able to defy federal orders without bloodshed.
But the guy shilling for Operation Warp Speed Trump (yourself) isn't the shill?
Hmmm, might want to think about that one agent Smith.
So you're a dishonest supporter at that. You're supporting both him and this false narrative created for him. Even calling people "shill" for daring to question the father of the clot shots.
I don't trust him precisely because of Warp speed and because he loves Israel. It's obvious he's part of the system, otherwise he wouldn't be selected in the first place, or become a real estate mogul for that matter.
That being said I ask you again: what's your alternative? You're either voting for one of the candidates who's less demonic or actively trying to dismantle the current system, which can only be achieved via massive changes in individual perception, which sadly is not gonna happen soon - the status quo has been entrenched for hundreds of years now.
The alternative would be decentralization. A movement focused on shoring up power locally, making use of state nullification or county nullification (even jury nullification) to resist federal tyranny.
But hoping the Jew worshiping federal tyrant loves me a bit more than the other is a waste of time.
You mean: let's fight the consequences of classical liberalism and masonic enlightenment ideas ("muh liberty above all", rampant individualism and view of the human being as homo economicus) with even more classical liberalism and enlightenment ideas? That won't fix things.
What people need is a common worldview that informs the way they approach government and society - above all, a worldview that allows for common objective morality not grounded in the individual or arbitrary made up "rights" that are not found in nature.
Only Christianity can provide that but the US is built upon the false presupposition that the state should be strictly secular and not influenced by the Church (as if the state doesn't need a moral framework which will inevitably be borrowed from some worldview, even if it's not a traditionally religious one).
If you define "more classical liberalism" to mean less centralized power then most certainly yes. I'm talking about pragmatic solutions to tyranny that work, while Trump believers have fallen into hero worship of a controlled opposition candidate that appears to only be there to pacify rebellion. He's on board with the NWO agendas at the end of the day. His wall wasn't built and the swamp wasn't drained.
Bullet to the ear (if we even believe that) or not.
Decentralization is not atomization. It is self determination with properly sized groups of people where their views can be better expressed in legislation as needed.
It could be at the level of a state, or if the state is too tyrannical at the level of a county. It can be done peacefully as many states have already shown can be done over recent decades. They are able to defy federal orders without bloodshed.
Mises Institute has a lot of writings on the topic https://mises.org/mises-wire/when-nullification-works-and-when-it-doesnt