My first ever public speech and it was on the JP - Lucas Gage
(files.catbox.moe)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
RIP this guys wife or kids, pets, something.
Not sure why pizzas are not welcome unless poisoned. I would ask the driver to eat a piece and then freeze it just in case. I would check if the driver is still alive in a week.
Where can I watch the entire conference? What is this JP event?
DIA (two) SPORA (to scatter; disperse)...gentiles are the dia aka the accumulated collective, which permits each chosen one to scatter and disperse among them.
It's a jew who suggests gentiles to come together aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka multiculturalism; mongrelization; miscegenation; melting pot; mass migration aka united states; united nations; european union, united kingdom; soviet union aka university; uniformity; unisex; unicode; unicef; universal pictures; universal serial bus (USB); universal studios; universal basic income aka equality through diversity and so on.
Nature sets apart aka from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perception)...few within suggest many to come together as to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
Apartheid within wholeness implies the status quo of being.
actually dIA is division not two (numerical)
a) If all is one; then any division made within implies two...one against another one.
b) One (perception) cannot divide oneness (perceivable) without suggesting DUAL-ism to another...it's ones consent to that which establishes a conflict of reason (one vs one) aka a division into two.
c) DIVIDE, verb - "to part or separate an entire thing; to part a thing into two or more pieces"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Divide
d) Numerical aka NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit", hence Latin unus - "one".
A jew (chosen one) suggests gentiles to count other ones, while ignoring oneself, which establishes conflicts of reason aka division into two.
e) The trick...suggesting division (one vs one aka two) to distract from perceivable separation (oneness into ones aka whole into partials).
Example: Take an apple as one. The first division establishes two parts of one apple. That's a suggested division tempting one to ignore perceivable separation aka seed within kernel; within flesh; within skin; within soil of all...each one part within whole oneness.
Separation offers partials the opportunity to discern self within whole...division tempts partials to fight each other, while ignoring whole.
f) All implies one in energy (internal/inherent power)...TWO energy cannot exist.
OK, I am not arguing with you again :-)
a) Argue implies ones charge against another, hence tempting 1 and 1 together into 2...this is called reasoning.
b) Again (a second time)...if inception towards death implies ones first time, then what's the second?
Forced anger for paid speaking event. Mentions a few good Jews. Follows that statement up by asking; "where are the good Jews?"
^^found the jew
I hear you man. ☈