Well while true about a lot of humanity, I believe the average Jewish person is duped more than anyone. Is their culture a culture, or is it made up of a bunch of laws that someone is manipulating them into doing?
They have 613 mitzvahs to start. And then they believe they are the best in the world. Perhaps they themselves are just slaves to a being (not God) and are being used.
Perhaps they themselves are just slaves to a being (not God) and are being used.
They obviously don't worship the one true God who became flesh, died and was reincarnated. So yes, they follow satan and they will bring about the antichrist and his rule once the temple is rebuilt. There's no such thing as "Abrahamic religions" - this is a jewish psy op. The God of Abraham is the Christian God (I am that I am), not the god of Judaism or Islam.
Religion/religio - "to bind anew" + abraham aka abh (father) ruham (multitude) implies ONE ignoring self when consenting to suggestions by another ONE, which establishes many under few.
FREE will of choice implies singular, hence each one being free to choose among one another within all...ignoring all (perceivable) for one another (suggested) binds self to another.
I am that I am
ME; MYSELF or I implies one taking possession over self, while ignoring that ALL (whole) sets each ONE (partials) free from one another.
I contradicts ONE because a partial (one) cannot take possession of anything without ignoring whole (oneness).
There is such a thing as Abrahamic religions. Those religions who believe the god of Abraham to be the one true god.
Christianity and Islam are proxies of Judaism, created for the purpose of having the world believe in the lord god of Israel and of Israel to be gods chosen people.
If you’re a Christian, all you have to is read the alleged words of so-called Jesus himself and you will have your eyes opened to it.
There is such a thing as Abrahamic religions. Those religions who believe the god of Abraham to be the one true god.
But the God of Abraham is Trinity, which includes Jesus Christ, the Son. Last time I checked Judaism and Islam don't believe in that God. Islam especially is very particular about Allah not having any sons and that's because Islam is based on the Arian heresy popular at the time. Both Islam and Judaism don't believe in the incarnated God.
Christianity and Islam are proxies of Judaism, created for the purpose of having the world believe in the lord god of Israel and of Israel to be gods chosen people.
That's your truther atheist-gnostic interpretation. In reality, historically the jews who didn't become Christian (so called rabbinic judaism and their Talmud) hate Christianity and were constantly banished from Christian kingdoms in the East and West because they were usurers and promoted degeneracy.
That's why they organized the revolutionary movements to topple the monarchies and establish their NWO which is international communism (which is NOT opposed to free market trade and capitalism, this is a common normie dialectical mistake "muh capitalism and muh free market economy").
They started with Britain in 1640 and the execution of Charles I by Oliver Cromwell, who had struck a deal with the jews letting them back in the empire and establishing the first central bank - Bank of England. Then the French revolution initiated by the jewish controlled jacobins (your namesake) and illuminati-infiltrated freemasons. And finally, the Bolshevik revolution in 1917 which subjugated the Russian Empire to the jews (the commies were jews naturally, it's widely known and attested). And now we're amidst the final global revolution and the establishment of a one world government. This is the grand scheme of things and a quick briefing of history and how we got here.
All major cultural revolutionary movements which naturally opposed the Christian traditional society and considered Christianity as the main enemy were instigated, financed and carried out by jews. Atheism is part of their psy ops and here you are spewing their propaganda (notice how zionists are mostly atheistic and only use the Torah for geopolitical and propaganda purposes as per the Ben Gurion educational program).
a) AVERAGE - "equal share of loss (inception towards death) among different parties (life)... a jew suggests gentiles to equalize differences (equality through diversity) to establish an unequal share of loss among jew and gentiles.
b) To establish such unequal share; a jew suggests THE-ism to tempt consenting gentiles to authorize suggesting jew.
This establishes ones choice (many) under chosen one (few)...an uneven distribution of choice, ignoring that nature gives each one free will of choice.
c) A jew suggest pluralism (people) to tempt each singular (person) gentile to ignore self for others, and to ignore being BY (per) SOUND (sonos) and therefore WITHIN (in) SOUND (sanus).
Once again...suggested spell-craft "insane person" is utilized to tempt gentiles into reasoning against one another who is or isn't an insane person, which distracts both sides from drawing inspiration from perceivable implication (if/then) of being in sound (in sanus) and by sound (per sonos).
bunch of laws
Aka suggested pluralism (laws) distracting from perceivable singularity...L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...natural law sets each one apart from one another, and each one balances on land; breathes air and sustains self as solid (life) during fluid (inception towards death) of water.
Consenting to suggested bundles/bunches together aka binds free will of choice anew.
manipulating them into doing
a) Automatic (inception towards death) generates manual (life)...manipulation requires manual consent to manual suggestion, while ignoring perceivable automatic.
b) One cannot be manipulated by others...one wields the free will of choice to manually permit others to manipulate (to manage by mental influence aka government) ones consent with suggested information; which one willingly holds onto; follows along and submits self to.
c) DO (inception towards death) generates RE-DO (life), hence reacting partials being enabled to react to enacting whole.
Choosing any suggested information to be truth or lie enslaves one to a conflict (truth vs lie) between both, while establishing those suggesting as master of both sides.
You can't keep a slave
a) Keeping enslaves one to what one holds onto; letting go reliefs burden upon ones free will of choice.
b) Nature sets free; choosing to keep anything within binds free.
c) Bind/bond/band - "anything that binds, fastens, or confines; an agreement or covenant; an instrument binding one to pay a sum to another" implies ones free will of choice consenting to the suggested information by another one.
Religion (Latin religio) - "to BIND anew"... hence ones choice (slave) binding self to chosen one (master).
not born to be one
a) Being ONE implies apart from ONE another, hence set free from ONE another...not bound together.
b) There can be only one aka all (whole) for one (partial) and one (partial) for all (whole) aka alone...ALL(in)ONE.
owning a debt
Ones consent to a suggestion implies taking into possession (own) a burden (debt) from another.
One (perception) does not own a debt to all (perceivable)...since one (temporary matter) cannot hold onto all (ongoing motion).
for nefarious reasons
a) FOR implies being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death).
b) NE (not) FARI (to speak) implies perceivable sound (natural), as opposed to suggested words (artificial).
c) Reason implies a conflict (versus) about suggested; while ignoring implication (if/then) of being perception within perceivable.
conformist
-IST (conformist) implies ones consent to suggested -ISM (conformism)... a jew suggests -isms to tempt gentiles CON (together; with), while ignoring that flow (inception towards death) sets form (life) apart from one another.
individualism a myth
a) A jew suggests both individual-ISM and mystic-ISM to tempt gentiles to consent.
b) Being implies one apart from one another...suggested individualism tempts one to divide self in two (dual) aka into a conflict of reason against one another.
c) MYTH; noun - "speech, thought, word, discourse, conversation; story, saga, tale, myth, anything delivered by word of mouth" implies suggested information (word); which tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (sound)....this implies spell-craft aka few utilizing suggestion to craft the spelling for consenting many.
Islamofascists are so stupid. Don't you have anything else other than to go after European stock....is it because we beat you and your old empire into the dust time and again?
Well while true about a lot of humanity, I believe the average Jewish person is duped more than anyone. Is their culture a culture, or is it made up of a bunch of laws that someone is manipulating them into doing? They have 613 mitzvahs to start. And then they believe they are the best in the world. Perhaps they themselves are just slaves to a being (not God) and are being used.
They obviously don't worship the one true God who became flesh, died and was reincarnated. So yes, they follow satan and they will bring about the antichrist and his rule once the temple is rebuilt. There's no such thing as "Abrahamic religions" - this is a jewish psy op. The God of Abraham is the Christian God (I am that I am), not the god of Judaism or Islam.
Religion/religio - "to bind anew" + abraham aka abh (father) ruham (multitude) implies ONE ignoring self when consenting to suggestions by another ONE, which establishes many under few.
FREE will of choice implies singular, hence each one being free to choose among one another within all...ignoring all (perceivable) for one another (suggested) binds self to another.
ME; MYSELF or I implies one taking possession over self, while ignoring that ALL (whole) sets each ONE (partials) free from one another.
I contradicts ONE because a partial (one) cannot take possession of anything without ignoring whole (oneness).
There is such a thing as Abrahamic religions. Those religions who believe the god of Abraham to be the one true god.
Christianity and Islam are proxies of Judaism, created for the purpose of having the world believe in the lord god of Israel and of Israel to be gods chosen people.
If you’re a Christian, all you have to is read the alleged words of so-called Jesus himself and you will have your eyes opened to it.
But the God of Abraham is Trinity, which includes Jesus Christ, the Son. Last time I checked Judaism and Islam don't believe in that God. Islam especially is very particular about Allah not having any sons and that's because Islam is based on the Arian heresy popular at the time. Both Islam and Judaism don't believe in the incarnated God.
That's your truther atheist-gnostic interpretation. In reality, historically the jews who didn't become Christian (so called rabbinic judaism and their Talmud) hate Christianity and were constantly banished from Christian kingdoms in the East and West because they were usurers and promoted degeneracy.
That's why they organized the revolutionary movements to topple the monarchies and establish their NWO which is international communism (which is NOT opposed to free market trade and capitalism, this is a common normie dialectical mistake "muh capitalism and muh free market economy").
They started with Britain in 1640 and the execution of Charles I by Oliver Cromwell, who had struck a deal with the jews letting them back in the empire and establishing the first central bank - Bank of England. Then the French revolution initiated by the jewish controlled jacobins (your namesake) and illuminati-infiltrated freemasons. And finally, the Bolshevik revolution in 1917 which subjugated the Russian Empire to the jews (the commies were jews naturally, it's widely known and attested). And now we're amidst the final global revolution and the establishment of a one world government. This is the grand scheme of things and a quick briefing of history and how we got here.
All major cultural revolutionary movements which naturally opposed the Christian traditional society and considered Christianity as the main enemy were instigated, financed and carried out by jews. Atheism is part of their psy ops and here you are spewing their propaganda (notice how zionists are mostly atheistic and only use the Torah for geopolitical and propaganda purposes as per the Ben Gurion educational program).
a) AVERAGE - "equal share of loss (inception towards death) among different parties (life)... a jew suggests gentiles to equalize differences (equality through diversity) to establish an unequal share of loss among jew and gentiles.
b) To establish such unequal share; a jew suggests THE-ism to tempt consenting gentiles to authorize suggesting jew.
This establishes ones choice (many) under chosen one (few)...an uneven distribution of choice, ignoring that nature gives each one free will of choice.
c) A jew suggest pluralism (people) to tempt each singular (person) gentile to ignore self for others, and to ignore being BY (per) SOUND (sonos) and therefore WITHIN (in) SOUND (sanus).
Once again...suggested spell-craft "insane person" is utilized to tempt gentiles into reasoning against one another who is or isn't an insane person, which distracts both sides from drawing inspiration from perceivable implication (if/then) of being in sound (in sanus) and by sound (per sonos).
Aka suggested pluralism (laws) distracting from perceivable singularity...L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...natural law sets each one apart from one another, and each one balances on land; breathes air and sustains self as solid (life) during fluid (inception towards death) of water.
Consenting to suggested bundles/bunches together aka binds free will of choice anew.
a) Automatic (inception towards death) generates manual (life)...manipulation requires manual consent to manual suggestion, while ignoring perceivable automatic.
b) One cannot be manipulated by others...one wields the free will of choice to manually permit others to manipulate (to manage by mental influence aka government) ones consent with suggested information; which one willingly holds onto; follows along and submits self to.
c) DO (inception towards death) generates RE-DO (life), hence reacting partials being enabled to react to enacting whole.
Choosing any suggested information to be truth or lie enslaves one to a conflict (truth vs lie) between both, while establishing those suggesting as master of both sides.
a) Keeping enslaves one to what one holds onto; letting go reliefs burden upon ones free will of choice.
b) Nature sets free; choosing to keep anything within binds free.
c) Bind/bond/band - "anything that binds, fastens, or confines; an agreement or covenant; an instrument binding one to pay a sum to another" implies ones free will of choice consenting to the suggested information by another one.
Religion (Latin religio) - "to BIND anew"... hence ones choice (slave) binding self to chosen one (master).
a) Being ONE implies apart from ONE another, hence set free from ONE another...not bound together.
b) There can be only one aka all (whole) for one (partial) and one (partial) for all (whole) aka alone...ALL(in)ONE.
Ones consent to a suggestion implies taking into possession (own) a burden (debt) from another.
One (perception) does not own a debt to all (perceivable)...since one (temporary matter) cannot hold onto all (ongoing motion).
a) FOR implies being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death).
b) NE (not) FARI (to speak) implies perceivable sound (natural), as opposed to suggested words (artificial).
c) Reason implies a conflict (versus) about suggested; while ignoring implication (if/then) of being perception within perceivable.
-IST (conformist) implies ones consent to suggested -ISM (conformism)... a jew suggests -isms to tempt gentiles CON (together; with), while ignoring that flow (inception towards death) sets form (life) apart from one another.
a) A jew suggests both individual-ISM and mystic-ISM to tempt gentiles to consent.
b) Being implies one apart from one another...suggested individualism tempts one to divide self in two (dual) aka into a conflict of reason against one another.
c) MYTH; noun - "speech, thought, word, discourse, conversation; story, saga, tale, myth, anything delivered by word of mouth" implies suggested information (word); which tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (sound)....this implies spell-craft aka few utilizing suggestion to craft the spelling for consenting many.
Islamofascists are so stupid. Don't you have anything else other than to go after European stock....is it because we beat you and your old empire into the dust time and again?