Since you're a "person of science" look at the data. The best data we have from government reporting systems in US and Europe showed these shots are the most dangerous in history and a dangerous medication by any modern definition. It showed that within the first few months and that signal only got worse from there.
In fact a look at the science of the vaccines themselves shows they are obviously unsafe. They chose to experiment on you with a device that produces an undetermined quantity of a toxic protein in an uncontrolled distribution throughout the cells of your body.
For people both young and old, healthy and sick it has proven deadly. It has killed and maimed.
If you're truly that ignorant of the science to think anything I said is controversial, that's hilarious.
I will most certainly not cite articles for what is common knowledge to anyone with an ounce of integrity who has done an ounce of research into the dangers.
This is why it's impossible to debate some of you. To debate we need to agree on basic facts about reality. Keep watching rumble videos and eating horsey paste, taking to you would be useless.
Nothing inherently wrong with peer review, except when all the reviewers are politically motivated, as is the current reality. It's quite obvious the medical industry says whatever it's paid to say.
Since you're a "person of science" look at the data. The best data we have from government reporting systems in US and Europe showed these shots are the most dangerous in history and a dangerous medication by any modern definition. It showed that within the first few months and that signal only got worse from there.
In fact a look at the science of the vaccines themselves shows they are obviously unsafe. They chose to experiment on you with a device that produces an undetermined quantity of a toxic protein in an uncontrolled distribution throughout the cells of your body.
For people both young and old, healthy and sick it has proven deadly. It has killed and maimed.
Can you please link one peer reviewed article? Or link what convinced YOU that they are unsafe?
I could link many, but there is no point with your type. We'll just run in circles all day, so go "do your own research".
And here we go. You have nothing. You're just following a different mob than i am. Buzz off.
If you're truly that ignorant of the science to think anything I said is controversial, that's hilarious.
I will most certainly not cite articles for what is common knowledge to anyone with an ounce of integrity who has done an ounce of research into the dangers.
There has never been a normal person who regretted not taking the injection. The same cannot be said about you retards.
Peer review lmfao...
The same peers that pushed this garbage for coin?
"peer review" = censored information
This is why it's impossible to debate some of you. To debate we need to agree on basic facts about reality. Keep watching rumble videos and eating horsey paste, taking to you would be useless.
Says the pot calling the kettle black.
Nothing inherently wrong with peer review, except when all the reviewers are politically motivated, as is the current reality. It's quite obvious the medical industry says whatever it's paid to say.
Glow harder this isn't convincing anyone.
You people ARE the source lol