If you're truly that ignorant of the science to think anything I said is controversial, that's hilarious.
I will most certainly not cite articles for what is common knowledge to anyone with an ounce of integrity who has done an ounce of research into the dangers.
A lot of peer reviewed articles are put out as a way to censor information or as one could say to be cautious with information you share. See it falls back to old out dated arguments surrounding Occam's razor that the simple answer is always best but the world isn't always so simple when you have thugs that rule the medical information along with an overreaching government and people purposely trying to kill us. Notice how they all seem to collude together when they want something done to someone like censoring a president or even Alex Jones.
Even peer reviews should be questioned and the so called experts, These same people tell you its normal to sexually mutilate children and change their sexes.
This is why it's impossible to debate some of you. To debate we need to agree on basic facts about reality. Keep watching rumble videos and eating horsey paste, taking to you would be useless.
Nothing inherently wrong with peer review, except when all the reviewers are politically motivated, as is the current reality. It's quite obvious the medical industry says whatever it's paid to say.
In Press, Journal Pre-proof - Journal pre-proofs are Articles in Press that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by the Editorial Board of this publication.
Highlights
• We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.
"Journal pre-proofs are Articles in Press that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by the Editorial Board of this publication. They have undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but are not yet definitive versions of record."
For what it's worth, I hope you and your entire death cult family is completely wiped out of existence. You are the worms that pull higher life down. Your slaughter is humanity's gain.
Can you please link one peer reviewed article? Or link what convinced YOU that they are unsafe?
I could link many, but there is no point with your type. We'll just run in circles all day, so go "do your own research".
And here we go. You have nothing. You're just following a different mob than i am. Buzz off.
If you're truly that ignorant of the science to think anything I said is controversial, that's hilarious.
I will most certainly not cite articles for what is common knowledge to anyone with an ounce of integrity who has done an ounce of research into the dangers.
You won't cite cuz you ain't right. Amituofo and again buzz off
There has never been a normal person who regretted not taking the injection. The same cannot be said about you retards.
Peer review lmfao...
The same peers that pushed this garbage for coin?
A lot of peer reviewed articles are put out as a way to censor information or as one could say to be cautious with information you share. See it falls back to old out dated arguments surrounding Occam's razor that the simple answer is always best but the world isn't always so simple when you have thugs that rule the medical information along with an overreaching government and people purposely trying to kill us. Notice how they all seem to collude together when they want something done to someone like censoring a president or even Alex Jones.
Even peer reviews should be questioned and the so called experts, These same people tell you its normal to sexually mutilate children and change their sexes.
"peer review" = censored information
This is why it's impossible to debate some of you. To debate we need to agree on basic facts about reality. Keep watching rumble videos and eating horsey paste, taking to you would be useless.
Says the pot calling the kettle black.
Nothing inherently wrong with peer review, except when all the reviewers are politically motivated, as is the current reality. It's quite obvious the medical industry says whatever it's paid to say.
Glow harder this isn't convincing anyone.
Nothing is wrong with ivermectin it isn't just for horses in fact the FDA was sued for this and lost.
You people ARE the source lol
(June-21-2024) A Systematic REVIEW of Autopsy findings in deaths after covid-19 vaccination - Forensic Science International Journal
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824001968
In Press, Journal Pre-proof - Journal pre-proofs are Articles in Press that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by the Editorial Board of this publication.
Highlights
• We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.
It's pre proof. Which means unproven. Which means it's worth nothing. Which means try again.
👍
It's pre proof. Which means unproven. Which means it's worth nothing. Which means try again.
Wrong. It may not be the definitive version but it has already passed peer review.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824001968
When you click on What's This:
"Journal pre-proofs are Articles in Press that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by the Editorial Board of this publication. They have undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but are not yet definitive versions of record."
For what it's worth, I hope you and your entire death cult family is completely wiped out of existence. You are the worms that pull higher life down. Your slaughter is humanity's gain.