I really think the truth is somewhere in between flat earth and globe earth, but these kinda posts just make us look retarded to anybody who happens to come by. Which isnt a easy thing to do since this site is delisted from google!
the truth is somewhere in between flat earth and globe earth
Being implies in (life) between (inception towards death)...others suggest flat earth and globe earth as truth to tempt one to incline towards a side, hence off-center.
Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions?
Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”?
Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?
What was that to prove? Literally nothing useful came from that.
AERODYNAMIC lift is the phenomenon where air flowing over a wing creates an area of low pressure above the wing and an area of high pressure below the wing. This is well-known, solid-grounded physics. I guess planes are fake somehow.
Bullets, however. You fire them from a gun. They only time they are propelled is while inside the barrel. There is no lift. The only force acting on them outside the gun barrel is drag and gravity.
But hey, keep living in a fanciful universe where nothing makes sense.
Lift (life) can discern oneself only while being propelled (inception towards death)...seeking proof from others contradicts ones self discernment.
Notice for yourself that living implies getting a lift by being propelled within process of dying, hence establishing temporary growth (matter) within ongoing loss (motion).
Literally nothing useful came from that.
a) How could "nothing" be lifted or propelled?
b) How could literal aka "words in their natural meaning" be lifted and propelled?
c) What if perceivable sound propels, while suggested words tempt those being propelled to ignore the lift thereof?
d) What if holding onto a suggested word makes it harder to lift self while being propelled within perceivable sound?
AERODYNAMIC
a) Aka aeros; aer (air) + dynamikos (powerful)...what can you tell me about the nature which empowers L(and) A(ir) W(ater)?
b) What if air implies matter within momentum of motion? What can you tell me about "solid; liquid; gas" and the power which differentiates each one from another?
Knowledge implies ones perception; physic implies all perceivable bringing forward each ones perception aka solid within fluid.
What others suggest IS tempts one to ignore what WAS perceivable. When you write "this is"...you tempt others to ignore that everything was perceivable before you could shape a suggestion about what this is.
That's the trick aka the difference between science/scio/to know/to perceive as one and scientism as suggested by another.
I guess planes are fake somehow.
All perceivable implies moving reality; ones consent to hold onto anything suggested implies "fake".
A plane implies a solid within fluid aka a temporal shaped within constant change. Your guesses on "solid-grounded physics" tempt you to ignore that. This is being used to manipulate your perception of reality with suggested fiction, shaped by others.
You fire them from a gun. They only time they are propelled is while inside the barrel.
Why does one need to maintain a gun? What happens to a gun if not maintained regularly? What is this power affecting a gun while "not in use"?
There is no lift.
a) There implies a differentiation between here and there...only during the same motion (loss) can there be differentiation of matter (growth). There's the propelled lift.
b) Others utilize IS (suggestion) to invert WAS (perception), and nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt one to de-nial everything perceivable. That's why you use the words "is" and "no"...neither of which can be perceived in nature.
Point at anything in nature and say "this is"...all was perceivable before you could suggest what this is.
The only force acting on them outside the gun barrel is drag and gravity.
Motion implies the only acting force...each matter within is forced to react, both to being (life) moved (inception towards death) and to one another, when trying to come together.
Drag (to draw) implies matter drawing from motion; or trying to draw from other matter, hence burdening self aka becoming heavier (gravity; gravis).
keep living
Living (temporary growth) implies within process of dying (ongoing loss)...one cannot keep anything, while everything moves. Holding onto anything makes it harder to resist the temptation of being processed.
nothing makes sense
All perceivable generates each ones perception...senses work only within everything available. Few suggest nothing to tempt many to ignore everything perceivable.
That's the official position of globe pseudoscience. Are you changing this now?
Common sense, logic, physics, and scientific experiment tells us that a flight going west from east should be about 1/3 of the time as the same flight route going east from west if the earth was spinning.
Of course that is not what happens and sometimes it even takes significantly longer when it should be significantly shorter.
They claim the air spins along with the earth so the plane is carried along and that is why there is no difference in speed due to flying against the spin. This is of course retarded because then they claim snipers have to account for the spin.
When you do the math it shows that pilots should have to dip their nose more than 1000 ft every few minutes to maintain level flight on a sphere otherwise they would just fly off into "space".
And birds can fly.
Omg your right, its all a lie.
I really think the truth is somewhere in between flat earth and globe earth, but these kinda posts just make us look retarded to anybody who happens to come by. Which isnt a easy thing to do since this site is delisted from google!
Being implies in (life) between (inception towards death)...others suggest flat earth and globe earth as truth to tempt one to incline towards a side, hence off-center.
YOU WON’T ANSWER.
Bullets are not propelled continuously and do not utilize the law of lift.
Aircraft are propelled continuously and are kept aloft by the law of lift.
Try harder, retard. The Federal Bureau of Idiots really aren't sending their best today are they?
a) Propelled (inception towards death) lift (life)...natural law.
b) Both bullet and aircraft aka temporary matter is lifted and propelled within ongoing motion.
What was that to prove? Literally nothing useful came from that.
AERODYNAMIC lift is the phenomenon where air flowing over a wing creates an area of low pressure above the wing and an area of high pressure below the wing. This is well-known, solid-grounded physics. I guess planes are fake somehow.
Bullets, however. You fire them from a gun. They only time they are propelled is while inside the barrel. There is no lift. The only force acting on them outside the gun barrel is drag and gravity.
But hey, keep living in a fanciful universe where nothing makes sense.
Lift (life) can discern oneself only while being propelled (inception towards death)...seeking proof from others contradicts ones self discernment.
Notice for yourself that living implies getting a lift by being propelled within process of dying, hence establishing temporary growth (matter) within ongoing loss (motion).
a) How could "nothing" be lifted or propelled?
b) How could literal aka "words in their natural meaning" be lifted and propelled?
c) What if perceivable sound propels, while suggested words tempt those being propelled to ignore the lift thereof?
d) What if holding onto a suggested word makes it harder to lift self while being propelled within perceivable sound?
a) Aka aeros; aer (air) + dynamikos (powerful)...what can you tell me about the nature which empowers L(and) A(ir) W(ater)?
b) What if air implies matter within momentum of motion? What can you tell me about "solid; liquid; gas" and the power which differentiates each one from another?
a) What if few suggest phenomenalism?... https://www.etymonline.com/word/phenomenalism#etymonline_v_46260
b) What if many can be tricked with suggestion to ignore perception?
Sleight of hand: "Say what you want (suggestion), but keep your lips sealed (perception)...Something like a phenomenon"... https://genius.com/Ll-cool-j-phenomenon-lyrics
Knowledge implies ones perception; physic implies all perceivable bringing forward each ones perception aka solid within fluid.
What others suggest IS tempts one to ignore what WAS perceivable. When you write "this is"...you tempt others to ignore that everything was perceivable before you could shape a suggestion about what this is.
That's the trick aka the difference between science/scio/to know/to perceive as one and scientism as suggested by another.
All perceivable implies moving reality; ones consent to hold onto anything suggested implies "fake".
A plane implies a solid within fluid aka a temporal shaped within constant change. Your guesses on "solid-grounded physics" tempt you to ignore that. This is being used to manipulate your perception of reality with suggested fiction, shaped by others.
Why does one need to maintain a gun? What happens to a gun if not maintained regularly? What is this power affecting a gun while "not in use"?
a) There implies a differentiation between here and there...only during the same motion (loss) can there be differentiation of matter (growth). There's the propelled lift.
b) Others utilize IS (suggestion) to invert WAS (perception), and nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt one to de-nial everything perceivable. That's why you use the words "is" and "no"...neither of which can be perceived in nature.
Point at anything in nature and say "this is"...all was perceivable before you could suggest what this is.
Motion implies the only acting force...each matter within is forced to react, both to being (life) moved (inception towards death) and to one another, when trying to come together.
Drag (to draw) implies matter drawing from motion; or trying to draw from other matter, hence burdening self aka becoming heavier (gravity; gravis).
Living (temporary growth) implies within process of dying (ongoing loss)...one cannot keep anything, while everything moves. Holding onto anything makes it harder to resist the temptation of being processed.
All perceivable generates each ones perception...senses work only within everything available. Few suggest nothing to tempt many to ignore everything perceivable.
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
Faggot fed
So the earth coordinates with flying objects that are propelled as to not spin underneath them.
The globe is the dumbest idiocy possible, and the people supporting it are dumber.
what makes you think planes are not affected?
That's the official position of globe pseudoscience. Are you changing this now?
Common sense, logic, physics, and scientific experiment tells us that a flight going west from east should be about 1/3 of the time as the same flight route going east from west if the earth was spinning.
Of course that is not what happens and sometimes it even takes significantly longer when it should be significantly shorter.
The globe is an obvious fraud.
U know that is a good point...why doesn't it take significantly shorter when traveling with the spin and longer against. I'm genuinely curious.
Also all pilots will testify that the curve of the planet can't be seen traveling at 35,000 feet and the horizon appears flat.
They claim the air spins along with the earth so the plane is carried along and that is why there is no difference in speed due to flying against the spin. This is of course retarded because then they claim snipers have to account for the spin.
When you do the math it shows that pilots should have to dip their nose more than 1000 ft every few minutes to maintain level flight on a sphere otherwise they would just fly off into "space".
How a Pilot Ended the Globe
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/how-a-pilot-ended-the-globe:4
No one will ever believe your strawman.
same reason ship times are not affected
does not get dumber than what you just said
I noticed you changed the phenomena from dropping altitude to time of travel for your previous comment.
The mark of deception.
What? What does altitude have to do with time of travel.
Address the point instead of trying to defame me because of an edit.
Planes aren’t real.
Frustrated globe religion member?
What about ones plane (inception towards death) of existence (life) aka ones response (re) to all (al)?