Globe logic is insane, full of contradictions - Flat Earth
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Bullets are not propelled continuously and do not utilize the law of lift.
Aircraft are propelled continuously and are kept aloft by the law of lift.
Try harder, retard. The Federal Bureau of Idiots really aren't sending their best today are they?
a) Propelled (inception towards death) lift (life)...natural law.
b) Both bullet and aircraft aka temporary matter is lifted and propelled within ongoing motion.
What was that to prove? Literally nothing useful came from that.
AERODYNAMIC lift is the phenomenon where air flowing over a wing creates an area of low pressure above the wing and an area of high pressure below the wing. This is well-known, solid-grounded physics. I guess planes are fake somehow.
Bullets, however. You fire them from a gun. They only time they are propelled is while inside the barrel. There is no lift. The only force acting on them outside the gun barrel is drag and gravity.
But hey, keep living in a fanciful universe where nothing makes sense.
Lift (life) can discern oneself only while being propelled (inception towards death)...seeking proof from others contradicts ones self discernment.
Notice for yourself that living implies getting a lift by being propelled within process of dying, hence establishing temporary growth (matter) within ongoing loss (motion).
a) How could "nothing" be lifted or propelled?
b) How could literal aka "words in their natural meaning" be lifted and propelled?
c) What if perceivable sound propels, while suggested words tempt those being propelled to ignore the lift thereof?
d) What if holding onto a suggested word makes it harder to lift self while being propelled within perceivable sound?
a) Aka aeros; aer (air) + dynamikos (powerful)...what can you tell me about the nature which empowers L(and) A(ir) W(ater)?
b) What if air implies matter within momentum of motion? What can you tell me about "solid; liquid; gas" and the power which differentiates each one from another?
a) What if few suggest phenomenalism?... https://www.etymonline.com/word/phenomenalism#etymonline_v_46260
b) What if many can be tricked with suggestion to ignore perception?
Sleight of hand: "Say what you want (suggestion), but keep your lips sealed (perception)...Something like a phenomenon"... https://genius.com/Ll-cool-j-phenomenon-lyrics
Knowledge implies ones perception; physic implies all perceivable bringing forward each ones perception aka solid within fluid.
What others suggest IS tempts one to ignore what WAS perceivable. When you write "this is"...you tempt others to ignore that everything was perceivable before you could shape a suggestion about what this is.
That's the trick aka the difference between science/scio/to know/to perceive as one and scientism as suggested by another.
All perceivable implies moving reality; ones consent to hold onto anything suggested implies "fake".
A plane implies a solid within fluid aka a temporal shaped within constant change. Your guesses on "solid-grounded physics" tempt you to ignore that. This is being used to manipulate your perception of reality with suggested fiction, shaped by others.
Why does one need to maintain a gun? What happens to a gun if not maintained regularly? What is this power affecting a gun while "not in use"?
a) There implies a differentiation between here and there...only during the same motion (loss) can there be differentiation of matter (growth). There's the propelled lift.
b) Others utilize IS (suggestion) to invert WAS (perception), and nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt one to de-nial everything perceivable. That's why you use the words "is" and "no"...neither of which can be perceived in nature.
Point at anything in nature and say "this is"...all was perceivable before you could suggest what this is.
Motion implies the only acting force...each matter within is forced to react, both to being (life) moved (inception towards death) and to one another, when trying to come together.
Drag (to draw) implies matter drawing from motion; or trying to draw from other matter, hence burdening self aka becoming heavier (gravity; gravis).
Living (temporary growth) implies within process of dying (ongoing loss)...one cannot keep anything, while everything moves. Holding onto anything makes it harder to resist the temptation of being processed.
All perceivable generates each ones perception...senses work only within everything available. Few suggest nothing to tempt many to ignore everything perceivable.
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
Faggot fed
So the earth coordinates with flying objects that are propelled as to not spin underneath them.
The globe is the dumbest idiocy possible, and the people supporting it are dumber.
what makes you think planes are not affected?
That's the official position of globe pseudoscience. Are you changing this now?
Common sense, logic, physics, and scientific experiment tells us that a flight going west from east should be about 1/3 of the time as the same flight route going east from west if the earth was spinning.
Of course that is not what happens and sometimes it even takes significantly longer when it should be significantly shorter.
The globe is an obvious fraud.
U know that is a good point...why doesn't it take significantly shorter when traveling with the spin and longer against. I'm genuinely curious.
Also all pilots will testify that the curve of the planet can't be seen traveling at 35,000 feet and the horizon appears flat.
No one will ever believe your strawman.
same reason ship times are not affected